Positive schemes for solving multi-dimensional hyperbolic systems of conservation laws II

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 187, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 428-440

  Liu, Xu Dong ^a   Lax, Peter D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; RUNGE KUTTA METHODS;

'CURRENT; COMPOSITE SCHEMES; CONVEX COMBINATIONS; HYPERBOLIC SYSTEMS OF CONSERVATION LAWS; INITIAL-VALUE PROBLEM; LOCAL MAXIMUM; MINIMUM PRINCIPLES; MULTI DIMENSIONAL; NUMERICAL SCHEME; SECOND-ORDER ACCURACY;

INITIAL VALUE PROBLEMS;

EID: 0038625306     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00100-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. B. Engquist, S. Osher, One-sided difference approximations for nonlinear conservation laws, Math. Comput. 36 (1981) 321-351.
2. K.O. Friedrichs, Symmetric hyperbolic linear differential equations, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 7 (1954) 345-392.
3. A. Harten, On a class of high resolution total-variation-stable finite-difference schemes, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21 (1) (1984) 1-23.
4. A. Harten, P.D. Lax, B. Van Leer, On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM Rev. 25 (1983) 35-61.
5. A. Harten, G. Zwas, Self-adjusting hybrid schemes for shock computations, J. Comput. Phys. 9 (1972) 568-583.
6. G.-S. Jiang, D. Levy, C.-T. Lin, S. Osher, E. Tadmor, High-resolution non-oscillatory central schemes with non-staggered grids for hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35 (1998) 2147-2168.
7. G.-S. Jiang, E. Tadmor, Non-oscillatory central schemes for multi-dimensional hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19 (1998) 1892-1917.
8. S. Jin, Z. Xin, The relaxing schemes for systems of conservation laws in arbitrary space dimensions, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 48 (1995) 235-276.
9. A. Kurganov, E. Tadmor, New high-resolution central schemes for nonlinear conservation laws and convection-diffusion equations, J. Comput. Phys. 160 (2000) 214-282.
10. D. Levy, E. Tadmor, Non-oscillatory boundary treatment for staggered central schemes, Math. Res. Lett. 4 (1997) 1.
11. X.-D. Liu, P. Lax, Positive schemes for solving multi-dimensional hyperbolic systems of conservation laws, CFD J. 5 (2) (1996) 133-156.
12. X-D. Liu, S. Osher, Convex ENO high order multi-dimensional schemes without field by field decomposition or staggered grids, J. Comput. Phys. 142 (2) (1998) 304-330.
13. X-D. Liu, E. Tadmor, 3rd order nonoscillatory central scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws, Numer. Math. 79 (1997) 397-425.
14. H. Nessyahu, E. Tadmor, Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys. 87 (1990) 408-463.
15. P.L. Roe, Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 43 (1981) 357-372.
16. C.-W. Shu, S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, II, J. Comput. Phys. 83 (1989) 32-78.
17. J.L. Steger, Coefficient matrices for implicit finite difference solution of inviscid fluid conservation law equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mechan. Eng. 13 (1978) 175-188.
18. J.L. Steger, R.F. Warming, Flux vector splitting of the inviscid gasdynamie equations with application to finite-difference methods, J. Comput. Phys. 40 (1981) 263-293.
19. P.K. Sweby, High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21 (5) (1984) 995-1011.
20. E. Tadmor, Skew-self adjoint form for systems of conservation laws, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 103 (2) (1984) 428-442.
21. B. Van Leer, in: Flux-vector splitting for the Euler equations, 170, Springer, Berlin, 1982, pp. 507-512.
22. B. Van Leer, On the relation between the upwind differencing schemes of Godunov, Engquist-Osher and Roe, SIAM J. Stat. Comput. 5 (1984) 1-20.
23. P. Woodward, P. Colella, The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks, J. Comput. Phys. 54 (1984) 115-173.