The dominant wave-capturing flux: A finite-volume scheme without decomposition for systems of hyperbolic conservation laws

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 218, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 275-294

  Edwards, Michael G ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dominant wave; Finite volume; Higher order; Lax Friedrichs; Rusanov

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

DOMINANT WAVE; FINITE-VOLUME; HIGH-ORDER; HIGH-ORDER APPROXIMATION; HIGHER-ORDER; HIGHER-ORDER APPROXIMATION; HYPERBOLIC SYSTEM; LAX-FRIEDRICH; NUMERICAL DIFFUSION; RUSANOV;

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS;

EID: 33748523013     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Godlewski E., and Raviart P. Numerical approximation of hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Appl. Math. Sci. 118 (1996), Springer-Verlag, New York
2. Roe P.L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 43 (1981) 357-372
3. A. Jameson, Artificial diffusion, upwind biasing, limiters and their effect on accuracy and multigrid convergence in transonic and hypersonic flows, AIAA 93-3359, 1993.
4. R.W. Maccormack, B.S. Baldwin, A numerical method for solving the Navier-Stokes equations with application to shock-boundary layer interaction, AIAA Paper 75-1, 1975.
5. Ni R. A multiple-grid scheme for solving the Euler equations. AIAA J. 20 11 (1982) 1565-1571
6. A. Jameson, W. Schmidt, E. Turkel, Numerical simulation of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time stepping schemes, AIAA Paper 81-1259, 1981.
7. Swanson R.C., and Turkel E. On central-difference and upwind schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 101 (1992) 297-306
8. T.H. Pulliam, J. Steger, Recent improvements in efficiency accuracy and convergence for implicit approximate factorization algorithms, AIAA No. 85-0360, 1985.
9. Lohner R., Morgan K., and Zienkiewicz O. The solution of non-linear hyperbolic equation systems by the finite element method. IJNMF 4 (1984) 1043-1063
10. S.F. Davis, TVD finite difference schemes and artificial viscosity, ICASE Report No. 84-20, 1984.
11. Yee H.C. Construction of explicit and implicit symmetric TVD schemes and their applications. J. Comput. Phys. 68 (1987) 151-179
12. Nessyahu H., and Tadmor E. Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 87 (1990) 408-463
13. Liu X.D., and Osher S. Convex ENO high order multi-dimensional schemes without field by field decomposition or staggered grids. J. Comput. Phys. 141 (1998) 1-27
14. Liu X.D., and Lax P. Positive Schemes for solving multi-dimensional hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 187 (2003) 428-440
15. Yu H., and Liu Y.P. A second order accurate, component-wise TVD scheme for non-linear, hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 173 (2001) 1-16
16. M.G. Edwards, Moving element methods with emphasis on the Euler equations, Ph.D. Thesis, Mathematics Department, Reading University, UK, 1987.
17. M.G. Edwards, The dominant wave-capturing finite-volume scheme for systems of hyperbolic conservation laws, in: Proceedings of the European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Jyvaskyla, 24-28 July, 2004.
18. Rusanov V.V. Calculation of interaction of non-steady shock waves with obstacles. Zhur Vychislitel noi Mathematicheskoi Fiziki 1 (1961) 267-279
19. Harten A., and Hyman J.M. Self adjusting grid methods for one dimensional hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 50 (1983) 235-269
20. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A sequel to Godunov's method. J. Comput. Phys. 32 (1979) 101-136
21. Sweby P. High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21 (1984) 995-1011
22. Fezou L., and Stoufflet B. A class of implicit upwind schemes for Euler simulations with unstructured meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 84 (1989) 174-206
23. T.J. Barth, D. Jesperson, The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes, AIAA Paper 89-0366, 1989.
24. Lyra P., and Morgan K. A review and comparative study of upwind biased schemes for compressible flow computation. Part III: Multidimensional extension on unstructured grids. Arch. Comput. Meth. Eng. 9 3 (2002) 207-256
25. Shu C.W., and Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77 (1988) 439-471
26. Sod G.A. A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of non-linear hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 27 (1978) 1-31
27. Courant R., and Friedrichs K.O. Supersonic flow and shock waves. Appl. Math. Sci. 21 (1948), Springer-Verlag, New York
28. Batten P., Lambert C., and Causon D.M. Positively conservative high-resolution convection schemes for unstructured elements. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 39 11 (1996) 1821-1838