Associative recognition and the hippocampus: Differential effects of hippocampal lesions on object-place, object-context and object-place-context memory

Hippocampus

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1139-1153

  Langston, Rosamund F ^a,b   Wood, Emma R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Context; Familiarity; Hippocampus; Novelty; Rat; Recognition memory

Indexed keywords

AMNESIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN FORNIX; BRAIN INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MENTAL TASK; NONHUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SPATIAL MEMORY; VISUAL MEMORY;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; ORIENTATION; RATS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 78650379573     PISSN: 10509631     EISSN: 10981063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20714     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aggleton JP, Brown MW. 1999. Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal-anterior thalamic axis. Behav Brain Sci 22:425-444.
2. Aggleton JP, Brown MW. 2006. Interleaving brain systems for episodic and recognition memory. Trends Cogn Sci 10:455-463.
3. Aggleton JP, Vann SD, Denby C, Dix S, Mayes AR, Roberts N, Yonelinas AP. 2005. Sparing of the familiarity component of recognition memory in a patient with hippocampal pathology. Neuropsychologia 43:1810-1823.
4. Ainge JA, Heron-Maxwell C, Theofilas P, Wright P, de Hoz L, Wood ER. 2006. The role of the hippocampus in object recognition in rats: Examination of the influence of task parameters and lesion size. Behav Brain Res 167:183-195.
5. Baxter MG, Murray EA. 2001. Opposite relationship of hippocampal and rhinal cortex damage to delayed nonmatching-to-sample deficits in monkeys. Hippocampus 11:61-71.
6. Belcher AM, Harrington RA, Malkova L, Mishkin M. 2006. Effects of hippocampal lesions on the monkey's ability to learn large sets of object-place associations. Hippocampus 16:361-367.
7. Bowles B, Crupi C, Mirsattari SM, Pigott SE, Parrent AG, Pruessner JC, Yonelinas AP, Kohler S. 2007. Impaired familiarity with preserved recollection after anterior temporal-lobe resection that spares the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16382-16387.
8. Broadbent NJ, Squire LR, Clark RE. 2004. Spatial memory, recognition memory, and the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14515-14520.
9. Brown MW, Aggleton JP. 2001. Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? Nature Rev Neurosci 2:51-61.
10. Bussey TJ, Duck J, Muir JL, Aggleton JP. 2000. Distinct patterns of behavioural impairments resulting from fornix transection or neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal and postrhinal cortices in the rat. Behav Brain Res 111(1-2):187-202.
11. Cassel JC, Cassel S, Galani R, Kelche C, Will B, Jarrard L. 1998. Fimbria-fornix vs selective hippocampal lesions in rats: Effects on locomotor activity and spatial learning and memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 69:22-45.
12. Clark RE, Zola SM, Squire LR. 2000. Impaired recognition memory in rats after damage to the hippocampus. J Neurosci 20:8853-8860.
13. Coutureau E, Galani R, Jarrard LE, Cassel JC. 2000. Selective lesions of the entorhinal cortex, the hippocampus, or the fimbria-fornix in rats: A comparison of effects on spontaneous and amphetamine-induced locomotion. Exp Brain Res 131:381-392.
14. de Hoz L, Knox J, Morris RGM. 2003. Longitudinal axis of the hippocampus: Both septal and temporal poles of the hippocampus support watermaze spatial learning depending on the training protocol. Hippocampus 13:587-603.
15. Deller T, Adelmann G, Nitsch R, Frotscher M. 1996. The alvear pathway of the rat hippocampus. Cell Tissue Res 286:293-303.
16. Dix SL, Aggleton JP. 1999. Extending the spontaneous preference test of recognition: Evidence of object-location and object-context recognition. Behav Brain Res 99:191-200.
17. Eacott MJ, Gaffan EA. 2005. The roles of perirhinal cortex, postrhinal cortex, and the fornix in memory for objects, contexts, and events in the rat. Q J Exp Psychol B 58(3-4):202-217.
18. Eacott MJ, Norman G. 2004. Integrated memory for object, place, and context in rats: A possible model of episodic-like memory? J Neurosci 24:1948-1953.
19. Eichenbaum H, Stewart C, Morris RG. 1990. Hippocampal representation in place learning. J Neurosci 10:3531-3542.
20. Eichenbaum H, Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C. 2007. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu Rev Neurosci 30:123-152.
21. Ennaceur A, Delacour J. 1988. A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats, Part 1. Behavioral data. Behav Brain Res 31:47-59.
22. Ennaceur A, Neave N, Aggleton JP. 1997. Spontaneous object recognition and object location memory in rats: The effects of lesions in the cingulate cortices, the medial prefrontal cortex, the cingulum bundle and the fornix. Exp Brain Res 113:509-519.
23. Fortin NJ, Wright SP, Eichenbaum H. 2004. Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus. Nature 431:188-191.
24. Forwood SE, Winters BD, Bussey TJ. 2005. Hippocampal lesions that abolish spatial maze performance spare object recognition memory at delays of up to 48 hours. Hippocampus 15:347-355.
25. Galani R, Obis S, Coutureau E, Jarrard L, Cassel JC. 2002. A comparison of the effects of fimbria-fornix, hippocampal, or entorhinal cortex lesions on spatial reference and working memory in rats: Short versus long postsurgical recovery period. Neurobiol Learn Memory 77:1-16.
26. Gaskin S, Tremblay A, Mumby DG. 2003. Retrograde and anterograde object recognition in rats with hippocampal lesions. Hippocampus 13:962-969.
27. Good MA, Barnes P, Staal V, McGregor A, Honey RC. 2007. Context-but not familiarity-dependent forms of object recognition are impaired following excitotoxic hippocampal lesions in rats. Behav Neurosci 121:218-223.
28. Gould TJ, Rowe WB, Heman KL, Mesches MH, Young DA, Rose GM, Bickford PC. 2002. Effects of hippocampal lesions on patterned motor learning in the rat. Brain Res Bull 58:581-586.
29. Hannesson DK, Howland JG, Phillips AG. 2004. Interaction between perirhinal and medial prefrontal cortex is required for temporal order but not recognition memory for objects in rats. J Neurosci 24:4596-4604.
30. Hebert AE, Dash PK. 2004. Nonredundant roles for hippocampal and entorhinal cortical plasticity in spatial memory storage. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 79:143-153.
31. Jarrard LE. 1989. On the use of ibotenic acid to lesion selectively different components of the hippocampal formation. J Neurosci Methods 29:251-259.
32. Jarrard LE, Davidson TL, Bowring B. 2004. Functional differentiation within the medial temporal lobe in the rat. Hippocampus 14:434-449.
33. Kumaran D, Maguire EA. 2007. Which computational mechanisms operate in the hippocampus during novelty detection? Hippocampus 17:735-748.
34. Malkova L, Mishkin M. 2003. One-trial memory for object-place associations after separate lesions of hippocampus and posterior parahippocampal region in the monkey. J Neurosci 23:1956-1965.
35. McDonald RJ, Murphy RA, Guarraci FA, Gortler JR, White NM, Baker AG. 1997. Systematic comparison of the effects of hippocampal and fornix-fimbria lesions on acquisition of three configural discriminations. Hippocampus 7:371-388.
36. Morris RG, Garrud P, Rawlins JN, O'Keefe J. 1982. Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 297:681-683.
37. Morris RG, Schenk F, Tweedie F, Jarrard LE. 1990. Ibotenate lesions of hippocampus and/or subiculum: Dissociating components of allocentric spatial learning. Eur J Neurosci 2:1016-1028.
38. Mumby DG. 2001. Perspectives on object-recognition memory following hippocampal damage: Lessons from studies in rats. Behav Brain Res 127(1-2):159-181.
39. Mumby DG, Gaskin S, Glenn MJ, Schramek TE, Lehmann H. 2002. Hippocampal damage and exploratory preferences in rats: Memory for objects, places, and contexts. Learn Memory 9:49-57.
40. Mumby DG, Tremblay A, Lecluse V, Lehmann H. 2005. Hippocampal damage and anterograde object-recognition in rats after long retention intervals. Hippocampus 15:1050-1056.
41. Nadel L, Willner J. 1980. Context and conditioning: A place for space. Physiol Psychol 8:218-228.
42. Norman G, Eacott MJ. 2005. Dissociable effects of lesions to the perirhinal cortex and the postrhinal cortex on memory for context and objects in rats. Behav Neurosci 119:557-566.
43. Norman KA, O'Reilly RC. 2003. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach. Psychol Rev 110:611-646.
44. Ranganath C, Yonelinas AP, Cohen MX, Dy CJ, Tom SM, D'Esposito M. 2004. Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia 42:2-13.
45. Sauvage MM, Fortin NJ, Owens CB, Yonelinas AP, Eichenbaum H. 2008. Recognition memory: opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity. Nature Neurosci 11:16-18.
46. Save E, Poucet B, Foreman N, Buhot MC. 1992. Object exploration and reactions to spatial and nonspatial changes in hooded rats following damage to parietal cortex or hippocampal formation. Behav Neurosci 106:447-456.
47. Squire LR, Wixted JT, Clark RE. 2007. Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: A new perspective. Nature Rev Neurosci 8:872-883.
48. Steffenach HA, Witter M, Moser MB, Moser EI. 2005. Spatial memory in the rat requires the dorsolateral band of the entorhinal cortex. Neuron 45:301-313.
49. Winters BD, Forwood SE, Cowell RA, Saksida LM, Bussey TJ. 2004. Double dissociation between the effects of peri-postrhinal cortex and hippocampal lesions on tests of object recognition and spatial memory: Heterogeneity of function within the temporal lobe. J Neurosci 24:5901-5908.
50. Yonelinas AP. 1994. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. J Exp Psych Learn Mem Cog 20:1341-1354.
51. Yonelinas AP. 2001. Components of episodic memory: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Phil Trans Royal Soc Lond Series B Biol Sci 356:1363-1374.
52. Yonelinas AP, Kroll NE, Quamme JR, Lazzara MM, Sauve MJ, Widaman KF, Knight RT. 2002. Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity. Nature Neurosci 5:1236-1241.