Accurate repair of non-cohesive, double strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Enhancement by homology-assisted end-joining

Yeast

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 837-848

  Moscariello, Mario ^a,b   Florio, Carolina ^a   Pulitzer, John F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Double strand breaks; Homologous pairing; Non homologous end joining; Repair

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; DIFFUSION; DNA REPAIR; DNA SYNTHESIS; DNA TEMPLATE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; LIGATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PLASMIDS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 78650377269     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.1789     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ahne F, Jha B, Eckardt-Schupp F. 1997. The RAD5 gene product is involved in the avoidance of non-homologous end-joining of DNA double strand breaks in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 743-749.
2. Baldwin GS, Brooks NJ, Robson RE, et al. 2008. DNA double helices recognize mutual sequence homology in a protein free environment. J Phys Chem B 112: 1060-1064.
3. Barzel A, Kupiec M. 2008. Finding a match: how do homologous sequences get together for recombination? Nat Rev Genet 9: 27-37.
4. Boulton SJ, Jackson SP. 1996. Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku80 homologue: roles in DNA double strand break rejoining and in telomeric maintenance. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 4639-4648.
5. Brachmann CB, Davies A, Cost GJ, et al. 1998. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14: 115-132.
6. Burgess SM, Kleckner N, Weiner BM. 1999. Somatic pairing of homologs in budding yeast: existence and modulation. Genes Dev 13: 1627-1641.
7. Burke DT, Dawson D, Searns T. 2000. Laboratory Course Manual for Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
8. Cairns BR, Lorch Y, Li Y, et al. 1996. RSC, an essential, abundant chromatin-remodeling complex. Cell 87: 1249-1260.
9. Chai B, Huang J, Cairns BR, Laurent BC. 2005. Distinct roles for the RSC and Swi/Snf ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev 19: 1656-1661.
10. de Mayolo AA, Sunjevaric I, Reid R, et al. 2009. The rad52-Y66A allele alters the choice of donor template during spontaneous chromosomal recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 9: 23-32.
11. Falaschi A. 2008. Similia similibus: pairing of homologous chromosomes driven by the physicochemical properties of DNA. HFSPJ 2: 257-261.
12. Florio C, Moscariello M, Ederle S, et al. 2007. A study of biochemical and functional interactions of Htl1p, a putative component of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rsc chromatin-remodeling complex. Gene 395: 72-85.
13. Frank-Vaillant M, Marcand S. 2002. Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination. Mol Cell 10: 1189-1199.
14. Hegde V, Klein H. 2000. Requirement for the SRS2 DNA helicase gene in non-homologous end joining in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 2779-2783.
15. Inoue H, Nojima H, Okayama H. 1990. High efficiency transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. Gene 96: 23-28.
16. Inoue S, Sugiyama S, Travers AA, Ohyama T. 2007. Self-assembly of double-stranded DNA molecules at nanomolar concentrations. Biochemistry 46: 164-171.
17. Jha B, Ahne F, Eckardt-Schupp F. 1993. The use of a double-marker shuttle vector to study DNA double-strand break repair in wild-type and radiation-sensitive mutants of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 23: 402-407.
18. Karathanasis E, Wilson TE. 2002. Enhancement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae end-joining efficiency by cell growth stage but not by impairment of recombination. Genetics 161: 1015-1027.
19. Kraus E, Leung WY, Haber JE. 2001. Break-induced replication: a review and an example in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 8255-8262.
20. Lanzuolo C, Ederle S, Pollice A, et al. 2001. The HTL1 gene (YCR020W-b) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is necessary for growth at 37 °C, and for the conservation of chromosome stability and fertility. Yeast 18: 1317-1330.
21. Liang B, Qiu J, Ratnakumar K, Laurent BC. 2007. RSC functions as an early double-strand-break sensor in the cell's response to DNA damage. Curr Biol 17: 1432-1437.
22. Lorenz A, Fuchs J, Burger R, Loidl J. 2003. Chromosome pairing does not contribute to nuclear architecture in vegetative yeast cells. Eukaryot Cell 2: 856-866.
23. Lu YM, Lin YR, Tsai A, et al. 2003. Dissecting the pet18 mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: HTL1 encodes a 7 kDa polypeptide that interacts with components of the RSC complex. Mol Genet Genom 269: 321-330.
24. Ma JL, Kim EM, Haber JE, Lee SE. 2003. Yeast Mre11 and Rad1 proteins define a Ku-independent mechanism to repair double-strand breaks lacking overlapping end sequences. Mol Cell Biol 23: 8820-8828.
25. Magni GE, Von Borstel RC. 1962. Different rates of spontaneous mutation during mitosis and meiosis in yeast. Genetics 47: 1097-1108.
26. Moore JK, Haber JE. 1996. Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 16: 2164-2173.
27. Mortimer RK, Johnston JR. 1986. Genealogy of principal strains of the yeast genetic stock center. Genetics 113: 35-43.
28. Romeo MJ, Angus-Hill ML, Sobering AK, et al. 2002. HTL1 encodes a novel factor that interacts with the RSC chromatin remodeling complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 22: 8165-8174.
29. Schiestl RH, Gietz RD. 1989. High efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells using single stranded nucleic acids as a carrier. Curr Genet 16: 339-346.
30. Shim EY, Ma JL, Oum JH, et al. 2005. The yeast chromatin remodeler RSC complex facilitates end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 25: 3934-3944.
31. Sikorski RS, Hieter P. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122: 19-27.
32. Strathern JN, Shafer BK, McGill CB. 1995. DNA synthesis errors associated with double-strand-break repair. Genetics 140: 965-972.
33. Thomas BJ, Rothstein R. 1989. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell 56: 619-630.
34. Valencia M, Bentele M, Vaze MB, et al. 2001. NEJ1 controls non-homologous end joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 414: 666-669.
35. Winston F, Dollard C, Ricupero-Hovasse SL. 1995. Construction of a set of convenient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C. Yeast 11: 53-55.