Chromosome pairing does not contribute to nuclear architecture in vegetative yeast cells

Eukaryotic Cell

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 856-866

  Lorenz, Alexander ^a   Fuchs, Jörg ^a   Bürger, Reinhard ^b   Loidl, Josef ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL NUCLEUS; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; INTERPHASE; MEIOSIS; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; NUCLEOLUS ORGANIZER REGION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEASTS;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 0142247081     PISSN: 15359778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/EC.2.5.856-866.2003     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Avivi, L., and M. Feldman. 1980. Arrangement of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus of plants. Hum. Genet. 55:281-295.
2. Bowdish, K. S., and A. P. Mitchell. 1993. Bipartite structure of an early meiotic upstream activation sequence from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:2172-2181.
3. Brown, W. V., and S. M. Stack. 1968. Somatic pairing as a regular preliminary to meiosis. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 95:369-378.
4. Burgess, S. M. 2002. Homologous chromosome associations and nuclear order in meiotic and mitotically dividing cells of budding yeast. Adv. Genet. 46:49-90.
5. Burgess, S. M., and N. Kleckner. 1999. Collisions between yeast chromosomal loci in vivo are governed by three layers of organization. Genes Dev. 13:1871-1883.
6. Burgess, S. M., N. Kleckner, and B. M. Weiner. 1999. Somatic pairing of homologs in budding yeast: existence and modulation. Genes Dev. 13:1627-1641.
7. Cherry, J. M., C. Ball, S. Chervitz, K. Dolinsky, S. Dwight, M. Harris, E. Hester, G. Juvik, A. Malekian, T. Roe, S. Weng, and D. Botstein. 2003. Saccharomyces genome database. [Online.] http://genome-www.stanford.edu/ Saccharomyces.
8. Comings, D. E. 1980. Arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus. Hum. Genet. 53:131-143.
9. Cremer, M., J. von Hase, T. Volm, A. Brero, G. Kreth, J. Walter, C. Fischer, I. Solovei, C. Cremer, and T. Cremer. 2001. Non-random radial higher-order chromatin arrangements in nuclei of diploid human cells. Chromosome Res. 9:541-567.
10. Cremer, T., and C. Cremer. 2001. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:292-301.
11. Esposito, R. E., and S. Klapholz. 1981. Meiosis and ascospore development, p. 211-287. In J. N. Strathern, E. W. Jones, and J. R. Broach (ed.), The molecular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces: life cycle and inheritance. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
12. Fuchs, J., A. Lorenz, and J. Loidl. 2002. Chromosome associations in budding yeast caused by integrated tandemly repeated transgenes. J. Cell Sci. 115:1213-1220.
13. Fung, J. C., W. F. Marshall, A. Dernburg, D. A. Agard, and J. W. Sedat. 1998. Homologous chromosome pairing in Drosophila melanogaster proceeds through multiple independent initiations. J. Cell Biol. 141:5-20.
14. Game, J. C. 1993. DNA double-strand breaks and the RAD50-RAD57 genes in Saccharomyces. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:73-83.
15. Gasser, S. M. 2002. Nuclear architecture: visualizing chromatin dynamics in interphase nuclei. Science 296:1412-1416.
16. Gerlich, D., J. Beaudouin, B. Kalbfuss, N. Daigle, R. Eils, and J. Ellenberg. 2003. Global chromosome positions are transmitted through mitosis in mammalian cells. Cell 112:751-764.
17. Gotta, M., T. Laroche, A. Formenton, L. Maillet, H. Scherthan, and S. M. Gasser. 1996. The clustering of telomeres and colocalization with Rap1, Sir3, and Sir4 proteins in wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 134:1349-1363.
18. Granot, D., and M. Snyder. 1991. Segregation of the nucleolus during mitosis in budding and fission yeast. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 20:47-54.
19. Grell, R. F. 1969. Meiotic and somatic pairing, p. 361-492. In E. W. Caspari and A. W. Raven (ed.), Genetic organization. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif.
20. Guacci, V., E. Hogan, and D. Koshland. 1994. Chromosome condensation and sister chromatid pairing in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 125:517-530.
21. Guacci, V., and D. B. Kaback. 1991. Distributive disjunction of authentic chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 127:475-488.
22. Henikoff, S, and L. Comai. 1998. trans-Sensing effects: the ups and downs of being together. Cell 93:329-332.
23. Heun, P., T. Laroche, M. K. Raghuraman, and S. M. Gasser. 2001. The positioning and dynamics of origins of replication in the budding yeast nucleus. J. Cell Biol. 152:385-400.
24. Hiraoka, Y., A. F. Dernburg, S. J. Parmelee, M. C. Rykowski, D. A. Agard, and J. W. Sedat. 1993. The onset of homologous chromosome pairing during Drosophila melanogaster embryogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 120:591-600.
25. Jin, Q., J. Fuchs, and J. Loidl. 2000. Centromere clustering is a major determinant of yeast interphase nuclear organization. J. Cell Sci. 113:1903-1912.
26. Jin, Q., E. Trelles-Sticken, H. Scherthan, and J. Loidl. 1998. Yeast nuclei display prominent centromere clustering that is reduced in non-dividing cells and in meiotic prophase. J. Cell Biol. 141:21-29.
27. Kadyk, L. C., and L. H. Hartwell. 1992. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132:387-402.
28. Kane, S. M., and R. Roth. 1974. Carbohydrate metabolism during ascospore development in yeast. J. Bacteriol. 118:8-14.
29. Keeney, S., and N. Kleckner. 1996. Communication between homologous chromosomes: genetic alterations at a nuclease-hypersensitive site can alter mitotic chromatin structure at that site both in cis and in trans. Genes Cells 1:475-489.
30. Kleckner, N., and B. M. Weiner. 1993. Potential advantages of unstable interactions for pairing of chromosomes in meiotic, somatic, and premeiotic cells. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 58:553-565.
31. Lacadena, J. R., B. Jodar, and E. Ferrer. 1983. Suprachromosomal organisation: cytogenetical rationale and experimental evidence, p. 81-90. In P. E. Brandham and M. D. Bennett (ed.), Kew Chromosome Conference II. George Allen & Unwin, London, England.
32. Li, L., E. E. Gericke, and M. E. Zolan. 1999. Homolog pairing and meiotic progression in Coprinus cinereus. Chromosoma 108:384-392.
33. Lichten, M., and J. E. Haber. 1989. Position effects in ectopic and allelic mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 123:261-268.
34. Loidl, J. 1995. Meiotic chromosome pairing in triploid and tetraploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 139:1511-1520.
35. Loidl, J. 2003. Chromosomes of the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int. Rev. Cytol. 222:141-196.
36. Loidl, J., F. Klein, and J. Engebrecht. 1998. Genetic and morphological approaches for the analysis of meiotic chromosomes in yeast, p. 257-285. In M. Berrios (ed.), Methods in cell biology, vol. 53. Nuclear structure and function. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif.
37. Loidl, J., F. Klein, and H. Scherthan. 1994. Homologous pairing is reduced but not abolished in asynaptic mutants of yeast. J. Cell Biol. 125:1191-1200.
38. Lukhtanov, V. A., and A. V. Dantchenko. 2002. Principles of the highly ordered arrangement of metaphase I bivalents in spermatocytes of Agrodiaetus (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Chromosome Res. 10:5-20.
39. Metz, C. W. 1916. Chromosome studies on the Diptera. II. The paired association of chromosomes in the Diptera, and its significance. J. Exp. Zool. 21:213-262.
40. Mitchell, A. P. 1994. Control of meiotic gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Rev. 58:56-70.
41. Mosgöller, W., A. R. Leitch, J. K. M. Brown, and J. S. Heslop-Harrison. 1991. Chromosome arrangements in human fibroblasts at mitosis. Hum. Genet. 88:27-33.
42. Peoples, T. L., E. Dean, O. Gonzalez, L Lambourne, and S. M. Burgess. 2002. Close, stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast is dependent on meiotic recombination, occurs independently of synapsis, and is distinct from DSB-independent pairing contacts. Genes Dev. 16:1682-1695.
43. Roth, R., and H. O. Halvorson. 1969. Sporulation of yeast harvested during logarithmic growth. J. Bacteriol. 98:831-832.
44. Sato, S., E. Matsumoto, and Y. Kuroki. 1981. Satellite association of the nucleolar chromosomes in a plant. Protoplasma 108:139-147.
45. Stack, S. M., and W. V. Brown. 1969. Somatic pairing, reduction and recombination: an evolutionary hypothesis of meiosis. Nature 222:1275-1276.
46. Stevens, N. M. 1908. A study of the germ cells of certain Diptera, with reference to the heterochromosomes and the phenomena of synapsis. J. Exp. Zool. 5:359-374.
47. Sym, M., J. Engebrecht, and G. S. Roeder. 1993. ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 72:365-378.
48. Therman, E., and C. Denniston. 1984. Random arrangement of chromosomes in Uvularia (Liliaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 147:289-297.
49. Vourc'h, C., D. Taruscio, A. L. Boyle, and D. C. Ward. 1993. Cell cycle-dependent distribution of telomeres, centromeres, and chromosome-specific subsatellite domains in the interphase nucleus of mouse lymphocytes. Exp. Cell Res. 205:142-151.
50. Weiner, B. M., and N. Kleckner. 1994. Chromosome pairing via multiple interstitial interactions before and during meiosis in yeast. Cell 77:977-991.
51. Wu, C., and J. R. Morris. 1999. Transvection and other homology effects. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:237-246.