Evaluation of accuracy of non-linear finite element computations for surgical simulation: Study using brain phantom

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 783-794

  Ma, J ^a   Wittek, A ^a   Singh, S ^a   Joldes, G ^a   Washio, T ^b   Chinzei, K ^b   Miller, K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bi plane X ray image intensifier system; Finite element method; Surgical simulation

Indexed keywords

3D MOTION; BRAIN PHANTOMS; COMPRESSION TESTS; CONSTITUTIVE PROPERTIES; FINITE ELEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING; FINITE ELEMENT SOLVER; FORCE-DISPLACEMENT RELATIONS; HUMAN BRAIN; INDENTERS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGES; NON-LINEAR FINITE ELEMENTS; PREDICTIVE POWER; REALISTIC GEOMETRY; SURGICAL SIMULATION; X-RAY IMAGE INTENSIFIERS;

BISMUTH; COMPRESSION TESTING; DEFORMATION; IMAGE INTENSIFIERS (ELECTRON TUBE); IMAGE INTENSIFIERS (SOLID STATE); IMAGING SYSTEMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VICKERS HARDNESS TESTING; X RAY ANALYSIS; X RAY APPARATUS; X RAYS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ARTICLE; BRAIN; EVALUATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY;

BRAIN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING;

EID: 78650367816     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255841003628995     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alterovitz R, Goldberg K, Pouliot J, Taschereau R, I-Chow Hsu. 2003. Needle insertion and radioactive seed implantation in human tissues: simulation and sensitivity analysis. Paper presented at the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taipei.
2. Belytschko T. 1983. An overview of semi discretization and time integration procedures. In: Belytschko T, Hughes TJR, editors. Computational methods for transient analysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p. 1-65.
3. Bilston L, Liu Z, Phan-Thien N. 1997. Linear viscoelastic properties of bovine brain tissue in shear. Biorheology. 34(6):377-385.
4. Bilston L, Liu Z,, Phan-Thien N. 2001. Large strain behaviour of brain tissue in shear: some experimental data and differential constitutive model. Biorheology. 38:335-345.
5. Bouguet JY. 2009. Documentation of a complete Camera Calibration Toolbox for Matlab [Internet]. c1999-2008. California Institute of Technology; [cited 2009 May 19]. Available from: http://www.vision.caltech.edu/bouguetj/index.html.
6. Brands DWA, Bovendeerd PH, Peters GW, Wismans JS, Paas MH, van Bree JL. 1999. Comparison of the dynamic behaviour of brain tissue and two model materials. Paper presented at 43rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, Warrendale, PA, USA.
7. Brands DWA, Bovendeerd PH, Peters GW, Wismans JS. 2000. The large strain dynamic behaviour of in-vitro porcine brain tissue and a silicone gel model material. Stapp Car Crash J. 44:249-260.
8. DiMaio SP, Salcudean SE. 2003. Needle insertion modelling and simulation. IEEE Trans Robot Autom. 19(5):864-875.
9. DiMaio SP, Salcudean SE. 2005. Needle steering and motion planning in soft tissues. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 52(6):1167-1179.
10. Farshad M, Barbezat M, Flüeler P, Schmidlin F, Graber P, Niederer P. 1999. Material characterization of the pig kidney in relation with the biomechanical analysis of renal trauma. J Biomech. 32(4):417-425.
11. Fung YC. 1993. Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissue. New York, NY: Springer.
12. Gronenschild E. 1997. The accuracy and reproducibility of a global method to correct for geometric image distortion in the X-ray imaging chain. Med Phys. 24(12):1875-1888.
13. Gronenschild E. 1999. Correction for geometric image distortion in the X-ray imaging chain: local technique versus global technique. Med Phys. 26(12):2602-2616.
14. Hartley R, Zisserman A. 2003. Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Heikkil J, Silven O. 1997. A four-step camera calibration procedure with implicit image correction. Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 1106-1113.
16. Hing JT, Brooks AD, Desai JP. 2007. A biplanar fluoroscopic approach for the measurement, modelling, and simulation of needle and soft-tissue interaction. Med Image Anal. 11(1):62-78.
17. Joldes G, Wittek A, Miller K. 2008. Non-locking tetrahedral finite element for surgical simulation. Commun Numer Methods Eng. 25(7): 827-836.
18. Jordan PS, Socrate S, Zickler TE, Howe RD. 2009. Constitutive modelling of porcine liver in indentation using 3D ultrasound imaging. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2(2):192-201.
19. Kovesi PD. 2000. Phase congruency: a low-level image invariant. Psycho Res. 64(2):136-148.
20. Kovesi PD. 2003. Phase congruency detects corners and edges. Paper presented at The Australian Pattern Recognition Society Conference. 2003, Sydney.
21. Kovesi PD. 2009. MATLAB functions for computer vision and image analysis. [Internet]. c1996-2007. The University of Western Australia [cited 2009 May 19]. Available form: http://www.csse.uwa.edu.au/pk/Research/MatlabFns/.
22. Ma J, Wittek A, Singh S, Joldes GR, Washio T, Chinzei K, Miller K. 2009. Accuracy of non-linear FE modelling for surgical simulation: study using the soft tissue phantom. Paper presented at Computational Biomechanics for Medicine IV workshop, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Interventation (MICCAI) 2009, London.
23. McCracken J, Manduca A, Felmlee J, Ehman RL. 2005. Mechanical transient-based magnetic resonance elastography. Magnet Reson Med. 53(3):628-639.
24. Mendis K, Stalnaker RL, Advani SH. 1995. A constitutive relationship for large deformation finite element modelling of brain tissue. J Biomech Eng. 117:279-285.
25. Miller K, Chinzei K. 1997. Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory. J Biomech. 30(11/12):1115-1121.
26. Miller K, Chinzei K. 2002. Mechanical properties of brain tissue in extension. J Biomech. 35(4):483-490.
27. Miller K, Chinzei K, Orssengo G, Bednarz P. 2000. Mechanical properties of brain tissue in-vivo: experiment and computer simulation. J Biomech. 33(11):1369-1376.
28. Miller K, Wittek A, Joldes G, Horton A, Dutta Roy T, Berger J, Morriss L.2010. Modelling brain deformations for computer-integrated neurosurgery. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Engng. 26:117-138.
29. Mitschke M, Navab N. 2003. Recovering the X-ray projection geometry for three dimensional tomographic reconstruction with additional sensors: attached camera versus external navigation system. Med Ima Anal. 7(1):65-78.
30. Morriss L, Wittek A, Miller K. 2008. Compression testing of very soft biological tissues using semi-confined configuration - a word of caution. J Biomech. 41(1):235-238.
31. Navab N, Bani-Hashemi A, Nadar MS, Wiesent K, Durlak P, Brunner T, Barth K, Graumann R. 1998. 3D reconstruction from matrices in a C-arm based 3D-angiography system. The Proceedings of Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Interventation- MICCAI. 1496: 119-129.
32. Ogden RW. 1972. Large deformation isotropic elasticity - on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Proc R Soc London Ser A, Math Phys Sci. 326(1567):565-584.
33. Okamura AM, Simone C, O'Leary MD. 2004. Force modelling for needle insertion into soft tissue. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 51:1707-1716.
34. Salcudean S, Turgay E, Rohling R. 2006. Identifying the mechanical properties of tissue by ultrasound strain imaging. Ultrasound Med Bio. 32(2):21-35.
35. Schroeder W, Martin K, Lorensen B. 2002. The visualization toolkit: an object-oriented approach to 3D graphics. New York, NY: Kitware, Inc.
36. Simone C, Okamura AM. 2002. Modelling of needle insertion forces for robot-assisted percutaneous therapy. Paper presented at the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington DC, USA.
37. Sinkus R, Tanter M, Xydeas T, Catheline S, Bercoff J, Fink M. 2005. Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. Magnet Reson Imaging. 23:159-165.
38. Weng J, Cohen P, Herniou M. 1992. Camera calibration with distortion models and accuracy evaluation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 14(10):965-980.
39. Wittek A, Miller K, Kikinis R, Warfield S. 2007. Patient-specific model of brain deformation: application to medical image registration. J Biomech. 40(4):919-929.
40. Wittek A, Dutta-Roy T, Taylor Z, Horton A, Washio T, Chinzei K, Miller K. 2008. Subject-specific non-linear biomechanical model of needle insertion into the brain. Comput Methods Biomech and Biomed Eng. 11(2):135-146.
41. Zhang Z. 1999. Flexible camera calibration by viewing a plane from unknown orientations. Paper presented at 1999 International Conference on Computer Vision. Corfu, Greece.
42. Zhang Z. 2000. A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 22(11):1330-1334.