The Omaha System and meaningful use: Applications for practice, education, and research

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 52-58

  Martin, Karen S ^a   Monsen, Karen A ^b   Bowles, Kathryn H ^c  

^a Martin Associates   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

health information technology; meaningful use; nursing; Omaha System; standardized terminology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; NOMENCLATURE; NURSING INFORMATICS; NURSING RESEARCH;

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; NURSING INFORMATICS; NURSING RESEARCH; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 78650362913     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181f9ddc6     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Health information technology. http://www.healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt. Accessed February 18, 2010.
2. Markle Foundation. Achieving the health IT objectives of ARRA: a framework for "meaningful use" and "certified or qualified" EHR: April 30, 2009. http://markle.org/downloadable-assets/20090430-meaningful- use.pdf. Accessed February 19, 2010.
3. Mosquera M. Blumenthal puts quality reporting at apex of meaningful use. Healthcare IT News. October 15, 2009. http://www.govhealthit. com/newsitem.aspx?nid=72216. Accessed February 17, 2010.
4. Sensmeier J. Alliance for Nursing Informatics statement to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing: acute care focusing on the area of technology. Comp Inform Nurs. 2010;28(1):63-67.
5. American Nurses Association. ANA recognized terminologies and data element sets. http://www.nursingworld.org/npii/terminologies. htm. Accessed January 20, 2010.
6. Lundberg C, Warren JJ, Brokel JM, et al. Selecting a standardized terminology for the electronic health record that reveals the impact of nursing on patient care [online]. OJNI. 2008;12(2):1-19. http://ojni.org/12-2/lundberg. pdf. Accessed February 18, 2010.
7. Omaha System. http://www.omahasystem.org. Accessed February 18, 2010.
8. Martin KS. The Omaha System: A Key to Practice, Documentation, and Information Management. Reprinted 2nd ed. Omaha, NE: Health Connections Press; 2005.
9. Institute of Medicine. Value in Health Care: Accounting for Cost, Quality, Safety, Outcomes, and Innovation: AWorkshop Summary. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2010. http://www. nap.edu/openbook.php?record-id= 12566&page=R1. Accessed February 1, 2010.
10. Monsen KA, Martin KS. Developing an outcomes management program in a public health department. Outcomes Manag. 2002a; 6(2):62-66.
11. Monsen KA,Martin KS. Using an outcomesmanagement program in a public health department. Outcomes Manag. 2002b;6(3):120-124.
12. Monsen KA, Fitzsimmons LL, Lescenski BA, Lytton AB, Schwichtenberg LD, Martin KS. A public health nursing informatics data-and-practice quality project. Comp Inform Nurs. 2006;24(3):152-158.
13. Monsen KA, Fulkerson JA, Lytton AB, Taft LL, Schwichtenberg LD, Martin KS. Comparing maternal child health problems and outcomes across public health nursing agencies. Matern Child Nurs J. 2010;14(3):412-421.
14. Minnesota Omaha System Users Group. http://omahasystemmn. org/. Accessed January 20, 2010.
15. Correll PJ, Martin KS. The Omaha System helps a public health organization find it voice. Comp Inform Nurs. 2009;27(1):12-15.
16. TIGER Initiative. http://www.tigersummit.com. Accessed January 20, 2010.
17. Entire issue. Nurs Outlook. 2009;57(6).
18. Gilbey V. Screening and counselling clinic evaluation project. Can J Nurs Res. 1990;22(3):23-38.
19. Martin KS, Bowles KH. Using a standardized language to increase collaboration between research and practice. Nurs Outlook. 2008;56(3):138-139.
20. Kataoka-Yahiro M, Cohen J, Yoder M, Canham D. A learningservice community partnership model for pediatric student experiences. Nurs Health Care Perspect. 1998;19(6):274-277.
21. Canham D, Mao C-L, Yoder M, Connolly P, Dietz E. The Omaha System and qualitymeasurement in academic nurse-managed centers: ten steps for implementation. J Nurs Educ. 2008;47(3):105-110.
22. Connolly PM, Crider M, Henninger R, Irwin C. Complementary alternative care for persons with schizophrenia living in the community: a pilot study [online]. OJNI. 2009;13(3):1-30. http://www.ojni.org/13-3/Connolly-Crider- Henninger-Irwin.pdf.
23. International Society of Psychiatric Nurses and the American Psychiatric Nurses Association. Essentials of psychiatric mental health nursing in the BSN curriculum: collaboratively developed by ISPN and APNA: 2008. http://www.apna.org/i4a/pages/index. cfm?pageid=3498. Accessed January 20, 2010.
24. Naylor MD. Transitional care for older adults: a cost-effective model. Leonard Davis Institute. Issue Brief. 2004;9(6):1-4.
25. Naylor MD, Hirschman KB, Bowles KH, Bixby MB, Konick- McMahan J, Stephens C. Care coordination for cognitively impaired older adults and their caregivers. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2007;26(4):57-58.
26. Chow SKY, Wong FKY, Chan TMK, Chung LYE, Chang KKP, Lee RPL. Community nursing services for postdischarge chronically ill patients. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(7B):260-271.
27. Barkauskas VH, Schafer P, Sebastian JG, et al. Clients served and services provided by academic nurse-managed centers. J Prof Nurs. 2006;22(6):331-338.
28. Monsen KA, Westra BL, Yu F, Ramadoss VK, Kerr MJ. Data management for intervention effectiveness research: comparing deductive and inductive approaches. Res Nurs Health. 2009;32(6): 647-656.
29. Monsen KA, Banerjee A, Das P. Discovering client and intervention patterns in home visiting data. West J Nurs Res. 2010. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0193945910370970.
30. Westra BL, Solomon D, Ashley DM. Use of the Omaha System data to validate Medicare required outcomes in home care. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2006;20(3):88-94.