Data management for intervention effectiveness research: Comparing deductive and inductive approaches

Research in Nursing and Health

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 647-656

  Monsen, Karen A ^a   Westra, Bonnie L ^a   Yu, Fang ^a   Ramadoss, Vijay Kumar ^b   Kerr, Madeleine J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computers technology; Homecare; Nursing care interventions; Statistical test development refinement; Systems research patterns of care

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSENSUS; FAMILY NURSING; HOLISTIC NURSING; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CONSENSUS; DATA COLLECTION; FAMILY NURSING; HOLISTIC NURSING; HOME CARE AGENCIES; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 70450172425     PISSN: 01606891     EISSN: 1098240X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nur.20354     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Barnard, K.E., Magyary, D., Sumner, G., Booth, C.L., Mitchell, S.K., & Spieker, S. (1988). Prevention of parenting alterations for women with low social support. Psychiatry, 51, 248-253.
2. Berger, A.M., & Berger, C.R. (2004). Data mining as a tool for research and knowledge development in nursing. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 22, 123-131.
3. Bowles, K. (2005). Use of the Omaha System in research. In: K.S. Martin (Ed.), The Omaha System: A key to practice, documentation, and information management (2nd ed., pp. 105-133). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
4. Clinical classification software for services and procedures. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). (2008). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Rockville, MD: Clinical classification software for services. and procedures. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Retrieved September 7, 2009 from www.hcupus.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/ccs_svcsproc/ccssvcproc.jsp.
5. Little, R.J.A., & Rubin, D.B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
6. Martin, K.S. (2005). The Omaha System: A key to practice, documentation, and information management (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
7. Martin, K.S., & Scheet, N.J. (1992). The Omaha System: Applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: Saunders.
8. Monsen, K.A. (2006). Linking public health nurse home visiting interventions to patient outcomes. Unpublished dissertation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
9. Monsen, K.A., Fitzsimmons, L.L., Lescenski, B.A., Lytton, A.B., Schwichtenberg, L.D., & Martin, K.S. (2006). A public health nursing informatics data and practice quality project. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 24, 152-158.
10. Neff, D.F., Kinion, E.S., & Cardina, C. (2007). Nurse managed center: Access to primary health care for urban Native Americans. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 24, 19-30.
11. Órlygsdóttir, B. (2007). Use of NIDSEC-compliant CIS incommunity-based nursing-directed prenatalcareto determine support of Nursing Minimum Dataset objectives. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 25, 283-293.
12. Tan, P.N., Steinbach, M., & Kumar, V. (2005). Introduction to data mining. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13. Westra, B.L., Oancea, C., Savik, K., & Marek, K. D. (2009). The feasibility of integrating the Omaha System data across homecare agencies and vendors. CIN: Computers, Informatics, and Nursing (in press).
14. Witten, I.H., & Frank, E. (2005). Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
15. Yu, F., & Lang, N.M. (2008). Using the Omaha System to examine outpatient rehabilitation problems, interventions, and outcomes between clients with and without cognitive impairment. Rehabilitation Nursing, 33, 124-131.