Comparing maternal child health problems and outcomes across public health nursing agencies

Maternal and Child Health Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 412-421

  Monsen, Karen A ^a   Fulkerson, Jayne A ^a   Lytton, Amy B ^b   Taft, Lila L ^c   Schwichtenberg, Linda D ^d   Martin, Karen S ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Saint Paul Ramsey County Public Health   (United States)

^c Dakota County Public Health   (United States)

^d Scott County Public Health   (United States)

^e Martin Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Informatics; Needs assessment; Omaha system; Outcomes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; CHILD HEALTH CARE; COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MATERNAL CARE; METHODOLOGY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PREGNANCY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; UNITED STATES;

CHILD; CHILD HEALTH SERVICES; DATA COLLECTION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HOUSE CALLS; HUMANS; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; MATERNAL-CHILD NURSING; MINNESOTA; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, HIGH-RISK; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 77954931126     PISSN: 10927875     EISSN: 15736628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-009-0479-9     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Goetzel, R. Z., Ozminkowski, R. J., Pelletier, K. R., Metz, R. D., & Chapman, L. S. (2007, September/October). Emerging trends in health and productivity management. The art of health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 1-8.
2. Monsen, K. A., Fitzsimmons, L. L., Lescenski, B. A., Lytton, A. B., Schwichtenberg, L. D., & Martin, K. S. (2006). A public health nursing informatics data-and-practice quality project. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 24, 152-158. doi:10.1097/00024665-200605000-00012.
3. Martin, K. S. (2005). The Omaha System: A key to practice, documentation, and information management (2nd ed.). St. Louis: Elsevier.
4. Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medical care. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 442, 166-206. doi: 10.2307/3348969.
5. United States 2000 Census. (2002). Ranking tables for counties by race alone, race alone or in combination, and two or more races populations. Accessed February 11, 2009, from http://www.censusu.gov/population/www/cen2000/briefs/ phct14/index.html.
6. Martin, K. S., Elfrink, V., & Monsen, K. A. (2008). Omaha System overview and components. Accessed November 8, 2008, from http://www.omahasystem. org/systemo.htm.
7. Martin, K. S., Norris, J., & Leak, G. K. (1999). Psychometric analysis of the Problem Rating Scale for Outcomes. Outcomes Management for Nursing Practice, 3, 20-25.
8. Martin, K. S., & Scheet, N. J. (1992). The Omaha System: Applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: Saunders.
9. Bowles, K. H. (2005). Use of the Omaha System in research. In K. S. Martin (Ed.), The Omaha System: A key to practice, documentation, and information management (2nd ed., pp. 105-136). St. Louis: Elsevier.
10. Monsen, K. A. (2005). Use of the Omaha System in practice. In K. S. Martin (Ed.), The Omaha System: A key to practice, documentation, and information management (2nd ed., pp. 58-83). St. Louis: Elsevier.
11. Minnesota Omaha System Users Group. (2009). Care plans and practice tools. Accessed February 11, 2009, from http://omahasystemmn.org/KBS-care-plans. htm.
12. Lindsay, B. (2004). Randomized controlled trials of socially complex nursing interventions: Creating bias and unreliability? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45, 84-94. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02864.x.
13. Barnard, K. E. (1998, February/March). Developing, implementing, and documenting interventions with parents and young children. Zero to Three, 23-29.
14. Olds, D. L. (2002). Prenatal and infancy home visiting by nurses: From randomized trials to community replication. Prevention Science, 3, 153-172. doi:10.1023/A:1019990432161.
15. Isaac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation (3rd ed.). San Diego: EdITS.