A public health nursing informatics data-and-practice quality project

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 152-158

  Monsen, Karen A ^a   Fitzsimmons, Laura L ^b   Lescenski, Barbara A ^c   Lytton, Amy B ^c   Schwichtenberg, Linda D ^d   Martin, Karen S ^e  

^a Washington County Public Health and Environment   (United States)

^b Dakota County Public Health   (United States)

^c REGIONS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d Scott County Health and Human Services   (United States)

^e Martin Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

Computerization; Documentation; Omaha System; Quality improvement; Terminology

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744457257     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00024665-200605000-00012     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, ed. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
2. Institute of Medicine. Key capabilities of an electronic health record system: letter report. Committee on Data Standards, ed. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2003.
3. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(2):166-206.
4. American Nurses Association. ANA recognized terminologies that support nursing practice. Washington, DC: ANA. Available at: http://www.nursingworld. org/nidsec/classlst.htm. Accessed September 10, 2005.
5. Barton AJ, Gilbert L, Erickson V, Baramee J, Sowers D, Robertson KJ. A guide to assist nurse practitioners with standardized nursing language. Comput Inform Nurs. 2003;21(3):128-135.
6. Monsen KA. Use of the Omaha System in practice. In: Martin KS, ed. The Omaha System: A Key to Practice, Documentation, and Information Management. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2005:58-83.
7. Monsen KA, Martin KS. Using an outcomes management program in a public health department. Outcomes Manag. 2002;6(3):120-124.
8. Monsen KA, Kerr MK. Mining quality documentation data for golden outcomes. Home Health Care Manage Pract. 2004;16(3):192-199.
9. Martin KS. The Omaha System: A Key to Practice, Documentation, and Information Management. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2005.
10. Wilkinson R, Marmot M. Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts. 2nd ed. London: World Health Organization; 2003.
11. Ahluwalia IB, Mack KA, Mokdad A. Mental and physical distress and high-risk behaviors among reproductive-age women. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(3):477-483.
12. Hayes BA, Muller R. Prenatal depression: a randomized controlled trial in the emotional health of primiparous women. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2004;18(2-3):165-183.
13. Bohn DK, Tebben JG, Campbell JC. Influences of income, education, age, and ethnicity on physical abuse before and during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004;33(5):561-571.
14. John R, Johnson JK, Kukreja S, Found M, Lindow SW. Domestic violence: prevalence and association with gynaecological symptoms. BJOG. 2004;111(10):1128-1132.
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Smoking during pregnancy - United States, 1990-2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53:911-915.
16. O'Connor MJ, Whaley SE. Alcohol use in pregnant low-income women. J Stud Alcohol. 2003;64(6):773-783.
17. Rawson RA, Gonzales R, Brethen P. Treatment of methamphetamine use disorders: an update. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;23(2):145-150.
18. Green DC, Gazmararian JA, Mahoney LD, Davis NA. Unintended pregnancy in a commercially insured population. Matern Child Health J. 2002;6(3):181-187.