Roadmap for the next generation of dynamic function allocation theories and strategies

Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 14-28

  Lagu, Amit V ^a   Landry, Steven J ^a  

^a SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation strategies; Adaptive allocation; Dynamic function allocation; Human computer interaction; Trigger mechanisms

Indexed keywords

ACTUAL ENVIRONMENTS; ADAPTATION STRATEGIES; ADAPTIVE ALLOCATION; AUTOMATED AGENTS; DYNAMIC FUNCTION ALLOCATION; DYNAMIC FUNCTION ALLOCATIONS; EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE; LEVELS OF AUTOMATION; ROADMAP; TRIGGER MECHANISM;

DYNAMICS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 78650344362     PISSN: 10908471     EISSN: 15206564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20209     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bailey, N. R., Scerbo, M. W., Freeman, F. G., Mikulka, P. J., &, Scott, L. A., (2006). Comparison of a brain-based adaptive system and a manual adaptable system for invoking automation. Human Factors, 48 (4), 693-709.
2. Bright, J. R., (1958). Does automation raise skill requirements ? Harvard Business Review, 36 (4), 85-98.
3. Chapanis, A., (1960). Human engineering. In, C. Flagle, W. Huggins, &, R. Roy, (Eds.), Operations research and systems engineering (pp. 534-582). Baltimore MD: John Hopkins Press.
4. Dekker, S. W. A., &, Woods, D. D., (2002). MABA-MABA or abracadabra? Progress on human-automation co-ordination. Cognition, Technology & Work, 4 (4), 240-244.
5. DiNocero, F., Lorenz, B., &, Parasuraman, R., (2005). Consequences of shifting from one level of automation to another: main effects and their stability. In, D. de Waard, K. Brookhuis, R. van Egmond, &, T. Boersema, (Eds.), Human factors in design, safety, and management (pp. 363-376). Maastricht, the Netherlands: Shaker Publishing.
6. Endsley, M. R., &, Kaber, D. B., (1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42 (3), 462-492.
7. Endsley, M. R., &, Kiris, E. O., (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37 (2), 381-394.
8. Farrell, S., &, Lewandowsky, S., (2000). A connectionist model of complacency and adaptive recovery under automation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26 (2), 395-410.
9. Fitts, Paul., (1951). Human engineering for an effective air-navigation and traffic-control system. Washington: National Research Council Division of Anthropology and Psychology Committee on Aviation Psychology.
10. Freeman, F. G., Mikulka, P. J., Scerbo, M. W., &, Hadley, G., (1998). Comparison of two methods for use in adaptive automation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86 (2), 1185-1186.
11. Freeman, F. G., Mikulka, P. J., Scerbo, M. W., Prinzel, L. J., &, Clouatre, K., (2000). Evaluation of a psychophysiologically controlled adaptive automation system, using performance on a tracking task. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 25 (2), 103-115.
12. Freeman, F. G., Mikulka, P. J., Prinzel, L. J., &, Scerbo, M. W., (1999). Evaluation of an adaptive automation system using three EEG indices with a visual tracking task. Biological Psychology, 50 (1), 61-76.
13. Hancock, P. A., (2007). Procedure and dynamic display relocation on performance in a multitask environment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, 37 (1), 47-57.
14. Hancock, P. A., &, Scallen, S. F., (1998). Allocating functions in human-machine systems. In, R. Hoffman, M. Sherrick, &, J. Warm, (Eds.), Viewing psychology as a whole: the integrative science of William M. Dember (pp. 509-539). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Harris, W. C., Hancock, P. A., Arthur, E. J., &, Caird, J. K., (1995). Performance, workload, and fatigue changes associated with automation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5 (2), 169-185.
16. Herbelin, B., Benzaki, P., Riquier, F., Renault, O., &, Thalmann, D., (2004). Using physiological measures for emotional assessment: a computer-aided tool for cognitive and behavioural therapy. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality & Associated Technology (pp. 307-314). Oxford, UK: University of Reading.
17. Kaber, D. B., &, Riley, J. M., (1999). Adaptive automation of a dynamic control task based on secondary task workload measurement. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3 (3), 169-187.
18. McFarlane, D. C., (2002). Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 17 (1), 63-139.
19. Morrison, J., Cohen, D., &, Gluckman, J., (1993). Prospective principles and guidelines for the design of adaptively automated crewstations. In, R. Jensen, &, D. Neumeister, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 172-177). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
20. Parasuraman, R., &, Byrne, E. A., (2003). Automation and human performance in aviation. In, P. Tsang, &, M. Vidulich, (Eds.), Principles of aviation psychology (pp. 311-356). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M., &, Molloy, R., (1996). Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems. Human Factors, 38 (4), 665-679.
22. Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M., Molloy, R., &, Hilburn, B., (1993). Adaptive function allocation reduces performance costs of static automation. In, R. Jensen, &, D. Neumeister, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 178-181). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
23. Prinzel, L. J., Freeman, F. G., Scerbo, M. W., Mikulka, P. J., &, Pope, A. T., (2003). Effects of a psychophysiological system for adaptive automation on performance, workload, and the event-related potential P300 component. Human Factors, 45 (4), 601-613.
24. Rani, P., Sarkar, N., &, Smith, C., (2003). Affect-sensitive human-robot cooperation-theory and experiments. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA '03. Vol. 2, pp. 2382-2387.
25. Rencken, W., &, Durrant-Whyte, H., (1993). A quantitative model for adaptive task allocation in human-computer interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 23 (4), 1072-1090.
26. Ryu, K., &, Myung, R., (2005). Evaluation of mental workload with a combined measure based on physiological indices during a dual task of tracking and mental arithmetic. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35 (11), 991-1009.
27. Sarter, N. B., &, Woods, D. D., (1995). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors, 37 (1), 5-19.
28. Scallen, S. F., &, Hancock, P. A., (2001). Implementing adaptive function allocation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11 (2), 197-221.
29. Scerbo, M. W., (1996). Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation. In, R. Parasuraman, &, M. Mouloua, (Eds.), Automation and human performance: theory and applications (pp. 37-63). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Sheridan, T. B., Corker, K. M., &, Nadler, E. D., (2006). Final report and recommendations for research on human-automation interaction in the next generation air transportation system. Cambridge MA: VOLPE.
31. Sheridan, T. B., &, Verplank, W. L., (1978). Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators. Cambridge, MA, and Alexandria, VA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Man-Machine Systems Laboratory.
32. Stammers, R. B., &, Hallam, J., (1985). Task allocation and the balancing of task demands in the multi-man-machine system-some case studies. Applied Ergonomics, 16 (4), 251-257.
33. Thackray, R., &, Touchstone, R., (1989). A comparison of detection efficiency on an air traffic control monitoring task with and without computer aiding. Washington DC: FAA Office of Aerospace Medicine.
34. Weiner, E., (1988). Cockpit automation. In, E. Weiner, &, D. Nagel, (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 433-461). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35. Whitfield, D., (1967). Human skill as a determinate of allocation of function. Ergonomics, 10 (2), 154-160.
36. Wieland, J., (2003). Developing a simulation approach for checking queuing-network stability. M. S. Thesis, Purdue University.
37. Wieland, J., Pasupathy, R., &, Schmeiser, B., (2003). Queueing-network stability: Simulation-based checking. Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Winter Simulation: Driving Innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 520-527).
38. Wright, P., Dearden, A., &, Fields, B., (2000). Function allocation: a perspective from studies of work practice. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52 (2), 335-355.
39. Wulfeck, J., &, Zeitlin, L., (1962). Human capabilities and limitations. In, R. Gagne, (Ed.), Psychological principles in system development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.