Comparison of two methods for use in adaptive automation

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 86, Issue 3 PART 2, 1998, Pages 1185-1186

  Freeman, Frederick G ^a   Mikulka, Peter J ^b   Scerbo, Mark ^b   Hadley, Gerald ^b  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BIONICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYBERNETICS; HUMAN; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

AUTOMATION; BIONICS; CYBERNETICS; HUMANS; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

EID: 0032091790     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1998.86.3c.1185     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. POPE, A., BOGART, E., & BARTOLOME, D. (1995) Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement. Biological Psychology, 40, 187-196.
2. SCERBO, M. W. (1996) Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation. In R. Parasuraman & M. Moulova (Eds.), Automation and human performance: theory and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 37-63.