Using Graphic Organizers to Improve the Teaching of Business Statistics

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 33-37

  Sirias, Danilo ^a  

^a SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650308182     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08832320209599695     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderson, J. R., 1995. Learning and memory: An integrated approach, New York: John Wiley.
2. Beins, B. C., 1993. Writing assignments in statistics classes encourage students to learn interpretation. Teaching Psychology, 20 (3): 161–164.
3. Braselton, S., and Decker, B. C., 1994. Understanding graphic organizers to improve the reading of mathematics. The Reading Teacher, 48 (3): 276–281.
4. Dettmer, W., 1997. Goldratt's Theory of Constraints, Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press.
5. Farnham-Diggory, S., 1992. Cognitive process in education, 2nd ed., New York: HarperCollins.
6. Gainen, J., and Willemsen, E. W., 1995. Reenvisioning statistics: A cognitive apprenticeship approach. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 61 (Spring): 99–108.
7. Ginsburg, H. P., 1977. Children's arithmetic, New York: D. Van Nostrand Co.
8. Goldratt, E., 1997. Critical chain, Great Barrington, MA: North River Press.
9. Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., and Yacci, M., 1993. Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Katayama, A. D., and Robinson, D. H., 2000. Getting students “partially” involved in note-taking using graphic organizers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68 (2): 119–133.
11. Kulhavy, R. W., Lee, B. J., and Caterino, L. C., 1985. Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10: 28–37.
12. Lan, W. Y., Bradley, L., and Parr, G., 1993. The effects of a self-monitoring process on college students' learning in an introductory statistics course. Journal of Experimental Education, 62 (1): 26–40.
13. Merkley, D. M., and Jefferies, D., 2001. Guidelines for implementing a graphic organizer. The Reading Teacher, 54 (4): 350–357.
14. Meyen, E. L., Vergason, G. A., and Whelan, R. J., 1996. Strategies for teaching exceptional children in inclusive settings, Denver, CO: Love.
15. Novak, J. D., 1991. Clarifying with concept maps. The Science Teacher, 58 (7): 45–49.
16. Rice, G. E., 1994. Need for explanations in graphic organizer research. Reading Psychology, 15: 39–67.
17. Roberts, L., 1999. Using concept maps to measure statistical understanding. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 30 (5): 707–717.
18. Robinson, D. H., 1998. Graphic organizers as aid to text learning. Reading Research and Instruction, 37 (Winter): 85–105.
19. Sakta, C. G., 1992. The graphic organizer: A blueprint for taking lecture notes. Journal of Reading, 35 (6): 482–484.
20. Schau, C., and Mattern, N., 1997. Use of map techniques in teaching applied statistics courses. The American Statistician, 51 (2): 171–175.
21. Scheinkopf, L. J., 1999. Thinking for a change, Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.
22. Slavin, R. E., 1991. Educational psychology, 3rd ed., Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23. Strasser, E. S., and Ozgur, C., 1995. Undergraduate business statistics: A survey of topics and teaching methods. Interfaces, 25 (3): 95–103.
24. Zanakis, S. H., and Valenzi, E., 1997. Student anxiety and attitudes in Business Statistics. Journal of Education for Business, 73 (1): 10–16.
25. Zwaneveld, B., 2000. Structuring mathematical knowledge and skills by means of knowledge graphs. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31 (3): 393–414.