Guidelines for implementing a graphic organizer

Reading Teacher

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 350-357

  Merkley, Donna M ^a   Jefferies, Debra ^b  

^a College of Education   (United States)

^b Crossroads Park Elementary   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038970157     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alvermann, D.E., & Boothby, P.R. (1986). Children's transfer of graphic organizer instruction. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 7, 87-100.
2. Anderson, R.C., Hiebert, E.H., Scott, J., & Wilkinson, I.A.G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission on reading. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
3. Ausubel, D.P. (1960). The use of advanced organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267-272.
4. Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
5. Baker, R.L. (1977). Meaningful reception learning. In H.L. Herber & R.T. Vacca (Eds.), Research in reading in the content areas: The third report (pp. 32-50). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Reading and Language Arts Center.
6. Barron, R.F. (1969). The use of vocabulary as an advance organizer. In H.L. Herber & P.L. Sanders (Eds.), Research in reading in the content areas: First year report (pp. 29-39). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Reading and Language Arts Center.
7. Bean, T.W., Singer, H., Sorter, J., & Frasee, C. (1986). The effect of metacognitive instruction in outlining and graphic organizer construction on students' comprehension in a tenth-grade world history class. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 153-169. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 393 484)
8. Beers, T. (1987). Schema-theoretic models of reading: Humanizing the machine. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 369-377. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 355 395)
9. Carr, S.C., & Thompson, B. (1996). The effects of prior knowledge and schema activation strategies on the inferential reading comprehension of children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19(1), 48-61. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 519 854)
10. Clark, S.R. (1990). Schema theory and reading comprehension. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 325 802)
11. Cooper, R.B., & Flynt, E.S. (1996). Teaching reading in the content areas. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
12. Darch, C.B., Carnine, D.W., & Kameenui, E.J. (1986). The role of graphic organizers and social structure in content area instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 275-295. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 393 401)
13. Dunston, P.J. (1992). A critique of graphic organizer research. Reading Research and Instruction, 31(2), 57-65. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 441 050)
14. Earle, R.A. (1969). Use of the structured overview in mathematics classes. In H.L. Herber & P.L. Sanders (Eds.), Research in reading in the content areas: First year report (pp. 49-58). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Reading and Language Arts Center.
15. Farnham-Diggory, S. (1992). Cognitive processes in education (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
16. Fry, E.B. (1989). Reading formulas - maligned but valid. Journal of Reading, 32, 292-297.
17. Gordon, C.J., & Rennie, B.J. (1987). Restructuring content schemata: An intervention study. Reading Research and Instruction, 26, 126-188. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 353 735)
18. Griffin, C.C., Simmons, D.C., & Kameenui, E.J. (1991). Investigating the effectiveness of graphic organizer instruction on the comprehension and recall of science content by students with learning disabilities. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 7, 355-376. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 441 315)
19. Griffin, C.C., & Tulbert, B.L. (1995). The effect of graphic organizers on students' comprehension and recall of expository text: A review of the research and implications for practice. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 11, 73-89. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 496 028)
20. Hawk, P.P. (1986). Using graphic organizers to increase achievement in middle school life science. Science Education, 70, 81-87. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 332 059)
21. Kinnison, R.L., & Pickens, I.R. (1984). Teaching vocabulary to the L.D. student from an interactive view of reading comprehension. Canyon, TX: West Texas State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 276 222)
22. May, F.B. (1990). Reading as communication: An interactive approach (3rd ed., pp. 396-426). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
23. McCormick, S. (1995). Instructing students who have literacy problems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24. Moore, D.W., & Readence, J.E. (1980). A meta-analysis of the effect of graphic organizers on learning from text. In M.L. Kamil & A.J. Moe (Eds.), Perspectives in reading research and instruction. 29th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 213-217). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
25. Moore, D.W., & Readence, J.E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 11-17.
26. National Council of Teachers of English & International Reading Association. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
27. Nelson-Herber, J. (1986). Expanding and refining vocabulary in content areas. Journal of Reading, 29, 626-633.
28. Novak, J.D. (1991). Clarifying with concept maps. The Science Teacher, 58(7), 45-49.
29. Novak, J.D., & Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30. Pearson, P.D., Hansen, J., & Gordon, C.J. (1979). The effect of background knowledge on young children's comprehension of explicit and implicit information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 201-209.
31. Recht, D.R. & Leslie, L. (1988). Effect of prior knowledge on good and poor readers' memory of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 16-20. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 384 774)
32. Rice, G.E. (1994). Need for explanations in graphic organizer research. Reading Psychology, 15, 39-67.
33. Richardson, J.S., & Morgan, R.F. (1997). Reading to learn in the content areas. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
34. Robinson, D.H., & Schraw, G. (1994). Computational efficiency through visual argument: Do graphic organizers communicate relations in text too effectively? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 399-415. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 498 458)
35. Roe, B.D., Stoodt, B.D., & Burns, P.C. (1998). The content areas. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
36. Ruddell, M.R. (1997). Teaching content reading and writing. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
37. Rumelhart, D.E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, & W.F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Sadoski, M., Pavio, A., & Goetz, E.T. (1991). A critique of schema theory in reading and a dual coding alternative. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 463-484. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 435 546)
39. Stahl, S.A., & Vancil, S.J. (1986). Discussion is what makes semantic maps work in vocabulary instruction. The Reading Teacher, 40, 62-69.
40. Taylor, B.M. (1985). Toward an understanding of factors contributing to children's difficulty summarizing textbook material. In J.A. Niles & R.V. Lalik (Eds.), Issues in literacy: A research perspective (pp. 125-131). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
41. Winograd, P.N. (1984). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 404-425.