Data accuracy assessment using enterprise architecture

Enterprise Information Systems

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 37-58

  Närman, Per ^a   Holm, Hannes ^a   Johnson, Pontus ^a   König, Johan ^a   Chenine, Moustafa ^a   Ekstedt, Mathias ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Architecture analysis; Data quality; Enterprise architecture; Probabilistic relational models

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARCHITECTURE ANALYSIS; DATA QUALITY; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; PROBABILISTIC RELATIONAL MODELS;

ARCHITECTURE; INDUSTRY; QUALITY CONTROL;

DATA HANDLING;

EID: 78650276572     PISSN: 17517575     EISSN: 17517583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17517575.2010.507878     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ballou, D.P. and Pazer, H.L., 1985. Modeling data and process quality in multi-input, multioutput information systems. Management Science, 31 (2), 150-162.
2. Ballou, D., Chengalur-Smith, I., and Wang, R., 2006. Sample-based quality estimation of query results in relational database environments. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 18 (5), 639.
3. Batini, C. and Scannapieco, M., 2006. Data quality: Concepts, methodologies and techniques. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. Cushing, B.E., 1974. A mathematical approach to the analysis and design of internal control systems. The Accounting Review, 49 (1), 24-41.
5. DoD, 2009. DoD Architecture Framework version 2.0 [online]. United States Department of Defense. Available from: http://cio-nii.defense.gov/sites/dodaf20/products/DoDAF_2-0_web.pdf [Accessed 16 August 2010].
6. Druzdzel,M., 1999. SMILE: structural modeling, inference, and learning engine and GeNIe: a development environment for graphical decision-theoretic models. In: Proceedings of the national conference on artificial intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 902-903.
7. Fowler, F., 2009. Survey research methods. Hoboken, NJ: Sage Publications, Inc.
8. Friedman, N., et al., 1999. Learning probabilistic relational models. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1300-1309.
9. Brue, G. and Launsby, R.G., 2003. Design for Six Sigma. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. Hochstim, J., 1967. A critical comparison of three strategies of collecting data from households. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62 (319), 976-989.
11. Iacob, M.E. and Jonkers, H., 2005. Quantitative analysis of enterprise architectures. In: Interoperability of enterprise software and applications, Geneva, Switzerland, February 2005. New York: Springer, 239-252.
12. Ishikawa, A., 1975. AMathematical Approach to the Analysis and Design of Internal Control Systems: A Brief Comment. The Accounting Review, 50 (1), 148-150.
13. ISO, I. and IEC, T., 2003. 9126-2:-Software engineering-product quality - Part 2 -external metrics. International Organization for Standardization and the International Electrotechnical Committee (IEC).
14. Jensen, F. and Nielsen, T., 2007. Bayesian networks and decision graphs. New York: Springer Verlag.
15. Johansson, E., Ekstedt, M., and Johnson, P., 2006. Assessment of enterprise information security: the importance of information search cost. In: Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2006. HICSS006219a-219a. Hawaii, USA: IEEE.
16. Johnson, P. and Ekstedt, M., 2007. Enterprise architecture: models and analyses for information systems decision making. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
17. Johnson, P., et al., 2007. Enterprise architecture analysis with extended influence diagrams. Information Systems Frontiers, 9 (2), 163-180.
18. Jonkers, H., et al., 2004. Concepts for modeling enterprise architectures. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 13 (3), 257-287.
19. Lagerström, R., et al., 2009. A method for creating enterprise architecture metamodels - applied to systems modifiability analysis. International Journal of Computer Science and Applications, 6 (5), 89-120.
20. Lankhorst, M., 2009. Enterprise architecture at work: Modelling, communication and analysis. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
21. Lankhorst, M., Proper, H., and Jonkers, H., 2009. The architecture of the ArchiMate language. In: Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling: 10th International Workshop, Bpmds 2009, and 14th International Conference, Emmsad 2009, Held at Caise 2009, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, June 8-9, 2009, Proceedings, 367.
22. Lee, Y.W., et al., 2006. Journey to data quality. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
23. Ministry of Defence, 2005. MODAF handbook, technical specification for MODAF [online]. Ministry of Defence. Available from: http://www.modaf.com/files/MODAF%20Technical%20Handbook%20V1.0.pdf [Accessed 16 August 2010].
24. Murphy, K., 2002. Dynamic Bayesian networks: representation, inference and learning. Thesis (PhD). University of California, Berkeley.
25. Närman, P., et al., 2008a. Data collection prioritization for software quality analysis. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 223, 29-42.
26. Närman, P., et al., 2008b. Using enterprise architecture models for system quality analysis. In: Enterprise distributed object computing conference, 2008. EDOC 008. 12th International IEEE, September, 14-23, Munich, Germany.
27. Närman, P., et al., 2009. Enterprise architecture analysis for data accuracy assessments. In: enterprise distributed object computing conference 2009, EDOC 009. 13th international IEEE, September, Auckland, New Zealand.
28. Raderius, J., Närman, P., and Ekstedt, M., 2009. Assessing system availability using an enterprise architecture analysis approach. In: Proceedings of Third Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2008), Sydney, Australia.
29. Redman, T.C., 1996. Data quality for the information age. Boston: Artech House.
30. Sanghai, S., Domingos, P., and Weld, D., 2003. Dynamic probabilistic relational models. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 18, 992-1002.
31. Saunders, M., Thornhill, A., and Lewis, P., 2009. Research methods for business students. England: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
32. Sommestad, T., Ekstedt, M., and Johnson, P., 2010. A probabilistic relational model for security risk analysis. Computers & Security, 29 (6), 659-679.
33. The Open Group, 2009a. ArchiMate 1.0 Specification. Zaltbommel, The Netherlands: Van Haren Publishing.
34. The Open Group, 2009b. TOGAF Version 9 "Enterprise Edition". Zaltbommel, The Netherlands: Van Haren Publishing.
35. Wang, R.Y., 2005. Information quality [Elektronisk resurs]. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
36. Wang, R., Ziad, M., and Lee, Y., 2001. Data quality. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
37. Warner, R., 2008. Applied statistics. London: SAGE Publications.
38. Yin, R.K., 2003. Case study research: Design and Methods. Washington, D.C: SAGE Publications.
39. Zachman, J., 1999. A framework for information systems architecture. IBM systems journal, 38 (2/3), 454-470.