A Method for creating enterprise architecture metamodels - applied to systems modifiability analysis

International Journal of Computer Science and Applications

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 89-120

  Lagerström, Robert ^a   Franke, Ulrik ^a   Johnson, Pontus ^a   Ullberg, Johan ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Enterprise architecture; Metamodeling; Probabilistic relational models; Software modifiability.

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953128879     PISSN: 09729038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bass, L., Clements, P., and Kazman, R. (1998). Software Architecture in Practice. Addison Wesley Longman / Software Engineering Institute.
2. Boehm, B. (1981). Software Engineering Economics. Prentice Hall
3. Corcho, O., Gómez-Pérez, A., and Fernández-López, M. (2004). Ontological Engineering. Springer-Verlag London.
4. Franke, U., Flores, W. R., and Johnson, P. (2009a). Enterprise architecture dependency analysis using fault trees and bayesian networks. In Proc. 42nd Annual Simulation Symposium (ANSS), pages 209-216, www.scs.org.
5. th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, pages 327{332.
6. rd International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), Fés, Morocco.
7. th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1300{1309. Morgan Kaufman.
8. Gaines, B. and Shaw, M. (1994). Using knowledge acquisition and representation tools to support scientific communities. In AAAI-94, page 7077141.
9. Grubb, P. and Takang, A. (2003). Software Maintenance: Concepts and Practice. World Scientific.
10. Gustafsson, P., Höök, D., Ericsson, E., and Lilliesköld, J. (2009). Analyzing it impacts on organizationl structure. In Portland International Center for Man-agement of Engineering and Technology Conf. Proc.
11. Hand, D. (1996). Statistics and the theory of measurement. J. R. Statist. Soc. Series A., 159, Part 3:445{492.
12. Harrison, W. and Cook, C. (1990). Insights on improving the maintenance process through software measurement. In Proc. of the IEEE Software Maintenance Conf.
13. Höök, D., Nordström, L., and Johnson, P. (2009). An enterprise architecture based method for quantified analysis of ict system impact on maintenance management. In ICOMS Asset Management Conference Proceedings.
14. International Standardization Organization/International Electrotechnical Committee. (2007). ISO/IEC 42010:2007 - Systems and software engineering {Recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems. Technical report, ISO.
15. Jarzabek, S. (2007). Efective Software Maintenance and Evolution: A Reuse-Based Approach. Auerbach Publications, Taylor & Francis Group.
16. Jensen, F. V. (2001). Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Springer-VerlagNew York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA.
17. Johnson, P., Lagerström, R., Närman, P., and Simonsson, M. (2007). Enterprise architecture analysis with extended inuence diagrams. Information Systems Frontiers, 9(2).
18. Jürjens, J. (2005). Secure Systems Development with UML. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
19. Kadane, J. and Wolfson, L. (1998). Experiences in elicitation. The Statistician, 47(1).
20. Keeney, R. and Winterfeldt, D. (1991). Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problems. In IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, volume 38.
21. König, J. and Nordström, L. (2009). Assessing impact of ict system quality on operation of active distribution grids. In IEEE PowerTech.
22. Kurpjuweit, S. and Winter, R. (2007). Viewpoint-based meta model engineering. In: Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2007).
23. th International Con-ference on Advanced Information Systems, volume 344, pages 25{28.
24. Lagerström, R., Johnson, P., and Ekstedt, M. (2009a). Architecture analysis of enterprise systems modifiability {a metamodel for software change cost estimation. In Submitted to journal.
25. Lagerström, R., Johnson, P., and Höök, D. (2009b). Architecture analysis of enterprise systems modifiability {models, analysis and validation. In To be submitted to journal.
26. Lagerström, R., Johnson, P., and Höök, D. (2009c). An enterprise architecture management pattern for software change project cost analysis. In Patterns in Enterprise Architecture Management (PEAM2009) workshop.
27. Lagerström, R., Johnson, P., Höök, D., and König, J. (2009d). Software change project cost estimation - a bayesian network and a method for expert elicitation. In the Int. Workshop on Software Quality and Maintainability Proc.
28. Lagerström, R., Johnson, P., and Närman, P. (2007). Extended inuence diagram generation. In Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications Confer-ence.
29. Lagerström, R., Saat, J., Franke, U., Aier, S., and Ekstedt, M. (2009e). Enterprise meta modeling methods - combining a stakeholder-oriented and a causality-based approach. In Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, volume 29, pages 381{393, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ISSN 1865-1348.
30. Laird, L. and Brennan, C. (2006). Software Measurement and Estimation: A Practical Approach. IEEE Computer Society / John Wiley & Sons.
31. Lankhorst, M. (2005). Enterprise Architecture At Work. Springer, Heidelberg.
32. Lauritzen, S. (1995). The em algorithm for graphical association models with miss ing data. In Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, volume 19, pages 191{201.
33. Liou, Y. (1990). Knowledge acquisition: issues, techniques, and methodology. In Proc. of the 1990 ACM SIGBDP Conference on Trends and Directions in Expert Systems, SIGBDP '90, pages 212{236. ACM Press.
34. Lodderstedt, T., Basin, D., and Doser, J. (2002). Secureuml: A uml-based modeling language for model-driven security. In In Proc. of UML02, LNCS 2460, page 426441. Springer-Verlag.
35. Nagel, E. (1931). Measurement. Erkenntnis, Volume 2, Number 1 / December:313-335.
36. Närman, P., Johnson, P., and Nordström, L. (2007). Enterprise architecture: A framework supporting system quality analysis. In Proc. of the International Annual Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conf.
37. Nuseibeh, B., Kramer, J., and Finkelstein, A. (1994). A framework for expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements specification. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 20(10):760{773.
38. O'Rourke, C., Fishman, N., and Selkow, W. (2003). Enterprise Architecture Using the Zachman Framework. Thomson Learning.
39. Pigoski, T. (1997). Practical Software Maintenance. John Wiley & Sons.
40. Ross, J. W., Weill, P., and Robertson, D. (2006). Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business School Press.
41. Society of Automotive Engineers. (2009). Architecture analysis and design language (aadl) standard. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University.
42. Spewak, S. and Hill, S. (1992). Enterprise Architecture Planning - Developing a Blueprint for Data, Applications and Technology. John Wiley and Sons.
43. Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103:677{680.
44. The Open Group (2008). TOGAF 2007 edition. Van Haren Publishing, Zaltbommel, Netherlands.
45. Ullberg, J., Lagerström, R., and Johnson, P. (2008). A framework for service interoperability analysis using enterprise architecture models. In IEEE International Conference on Services Computing.
46. Winter, R. and Fischer, R. (2007). Essential layers, artifacts, and dependencies of enterprise architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, Volume 3, Number 2:7{18.
47. Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst. J., 26(3):276{292.