Computer-mediated communication versus vocal communication and the attenuation of pre-interaction impressions

Media Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 364-386

  Walther, Joseph B ^a   Deandrea, David C ^a   Tong, Stephanie Tom ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650274527     PISSN: 15213269     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2010.524913     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adkins, M., & Brashers, D. (1995). The power of language in computer mediated groups. Management Communication Quarterly, 8, 289-322.
2. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2006). The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Interacting via the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), article 7. Retrieved June 1, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3/amichai-hamburger.html
3. Baker, A. J. (2008) Down the rabbit hole: The role of place in the initiation and development of online relationships. In A. Barak (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications (pp. 163-184). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Baym, N. K. (2009). A call for grounding in the face of blurred boundaries. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 720-723.
5. Brewer, M. B. (2000). Research design and issues of validity. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 3-16). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C., Lundberg, M., & Allspach, L. A. (2000). Interactivity in human-computer interaction: A study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 553-574.
7. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A. Jr., Kam, K., Dunbar, N., & Fischer, J. (2002). Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication, 52, 657-677.
8. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Floyd, K. (2001). Does participation affect deception success? A test of the interactivity principle. Human Communication Research, 27, 503-534.
9. Burgoon, J. K., & Burgoon, M. (2001). Expectancy theories. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 79-101). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420-443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Epley, N., & Kruger, J. (2005). What you type isn't what they read: The perseverance of stereotypes and expectancies over email. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 414-422.
12. Fiore, A. T., & Donath, J. (2004). Online personals: An overview. In E. Dykstra-Erickson & M. Tscheligi (Eds.), CHI '04 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1395-1398). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://smg.media.mit.edu/papers/atf/chi2004_personals_short.pdf
13. Furr, R. M. (2004). Interpreting effect sizes in contrast analysis. Understanding Statistics, 3, 1-25.
14. Gill, A. J., & Oberlander, J. (2003). Perception of email personality at zero acquaintance: Extraversion takes care of itself; Neuroticism is a worry. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 456-461). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Guadagno, R. E., & Cialdini, R. B. (2002). Online persuasion: An examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice, 6, 38-51.
16. Hancock, J. T. (2004). Verbal irony use in computer-mediated and face-to-face conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 447-463.
17. Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 612-634). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
18. Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
19. Honeycutt, L. (2001). Comparing e-mail and synchronous conferencing in online peer response. Written Communication, 18, 26-60.
20. Ickes, W., Patterson, M. L., Rajecki, D. W., & Tanford, S. (1982). Behavioral and cognitive consequences of reciprocal versus compensatory responses to preinteraction expectancies. Social Cognition, 1, 160-190.
21. Info-Mac. (1996, March 31). Chatter 2.03.1. Retrieved October 1, 2009, from http://www.info-mac.org/viewtopic.php?fD115&tD863&sidD2d3bb4d6f0be3bd71eab6f79b3f05e60
22. Kalman, Y. M., Ravid, G., Raban, D. R., & Rafaeli, S. (2006). Pauses and response latencies: A chronemic analysis of asynchronous CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1). Retrieved January 31, 2010, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue1/kalman.html
23. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
24. Kock, N. (2004). The psychobiological model: Towards a new theory of computermediated communication. Organization Science, 15, 327-348.
25. Latane, B., & L'Herrou, T. (1996). Spatial clustering in the conformity game: Dynamic social impact in electronic groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1218-1230.
26. McCroskey, J. C., Holdridge, W., & Toomb, J. K. (1974). An instrument for measuring the source credibility of basic speech communication instructors. The Speech Teacher, 23, 26-33.
27. Newman, M. L., Groom, C. J., Handelman, L. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45, 211-236.
28. Pavlick, J. (1996). New media technology: Cultural and commercial perspectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2007). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC2007 [Software]. Austin, TX: liwc.net
30. Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Austin, TX: LIWC.net. Retrieved February 1, 2010, from http://www.liwc.net/LIWC2007LanguageManual.pdf
31. Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 110-134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1998). Interactivity on the nets. In F. Sudweeks, M. McLaughlin, & S. Rafaeli (Eds.), Network & netplay: Virtual groups on the Internet (pp. 173-189). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
33. Ramirez, Jr., A., & Wang, Z. (2008). When on-line meets off-line: An expectancy violation theory perspective on modality switching. Journal of Communication, 58, 20-39.
34. Ramirez, Jr., A., & Zhang, S. (2007).When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74, 287-310.
35. Ramirez, Jr., A., Zhang, S., McGraw, C., & Lin, S. (2007). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction revisited: A comparison of participant-observer perspectives. Communication Monographs, 74, 492-516.
36. Riva, G., & Galimberti, C. (1998). Computer-mediated communication: Identity and social interaction in an electronic environment. Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs, 124, 434-446.
37. Rosenbloom, S. (2008, January 3). Putting your best cyberface. New York Times. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com
38. Selfe, C. L., & Meyer, P. R. (1991). Testing claims for on-line conferences. Written Communication, 8, 163-192.
39. Selfe, C. L., & Meyer, P. R., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the "social" in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
40. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
41. Snyder, M., & Haugen, J. A. (1994). Why does behavioral confirmation occur? A functional perspective on the role of the perceiver. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 218-246.
42. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
43. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
44. Walther, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computermediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23, 342-369.
45. Walther, J. B. (2006). Nonverbal dynamics in computer-mediated communication, or:(and the net:('s with you,:) and you:) alone. In V. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.), Handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 461-479). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538-2557.
47. Walther, J. B. (2009). Computer-mediated communication and virtual groups: Applications to interethnic conflict. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 225-238.
48. Walther, J. B. (2010). Computer-mediated communication. In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff, & D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (2nd ed., pp. 489-505). Los Angeles: Sage.
49. Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computermediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Walther, J. B., & Tidwell, L. C. (1995). Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 5, 355-378.
51. Walther, J. B., Loh, T., & Granka, L. (2005). Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 36-65.
52. Walther, J. B., & Slovacek, C., & Tidwell, L. C. (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long term and short term virtual teams. Communication Research, 28, 105-134.
53. Zhou, L., Burgoon, J. K., Nunamaker, J. F., & Twitchell, D. (2004). Automated linguistics based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computermediated communication: An empirical investigation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 81-106.