Comparing E-Mail and Synchronous Conferencing in Online Peer Response

Written Communication

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 26-60

  Honeycutt, Lee ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001178201     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088301018001002     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Batson, T. (1993). The origins of ENFI. In B. Bruce, J. K. Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 87-112). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bump, J. (1990). Radical changes in class discussion using networking computers. Computers and the Humanities, 24, 49-65.
3. Cech, C. G., & Condon, S. L. (1998). Message size constraints on discourse planning in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 255-263.
4. Chafe, W. L. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. In D. Tanner (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35-53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Chafe, W. L., & Danielewicz, J. (1987). Properties of spoken and written language. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 83-113). New York: Academic Press.
6. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber, & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
10. Cohen, P. R. (1984). The pragmatics of referring and the modality of communication. Computational Linguistics, 10, 97-146.
11. CommonSpace [Computer software]. (1996). Boston: Sixth Floor Media.
12. Elbow, P., & Belanoff, P. (1995). Sharing and responding (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Gere, A. R., & Abbott, R. D. (1985). Talking about writing: The language of writing groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 362-381.
14. Gere, A. R., & Stevens, R. S. (1985). The language of writing groups: How oral response shapes revision. In S. W. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision (pp. 85-105). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. Haynes, C. (1998). Help! There's a MOO in this class! In C. Haynes & J. R. Holmevik (Eds.), High wired: On the design, use, and theory of educational MOOs (pp. 161-176). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16. Ko, K. K. (1996). Structural characteristics of computer-mediated language: A comparative analysis of InterChange discourse. Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronique de Communication [Online serial], 6. Available e-mail: comserve@cios. org Message: Send Ko V6N396.
17. Kremers, M. (1993). Student authority and teacher freedom: ENFI at New York Institute of Technology. In B. Bruce, J. K. Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 113-123). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Mabrito, M. (1991). Electronic mail as a vehicle for peer response: Conversations of high-and low-apprehensive writers. Written Communication, 8, 509-532.
19. Maquelin, O. (1994). MUDweller 1.2 [Online freeware computer program]. Available: http://www.macmud.8m.com/clients/dweller.html
20. Neulinger, N. (1995). Chat 2.1. [Online shareware computer program]. Available: http://www.macinsearch.com/infomac2/communication/inet/chat-21p12.html
21. Neuwirth, C. M., Palmquist, M., Cochran, C., Gillespie, T., Hartman, K., & Hajduk, T. (1993). Why write—together—concurrently on a computer network? In B. Bruce, J. K. Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 181-209). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. White Plains, NY: Longman.
23. Schleppegrell, M. J. (1998). Grammar as resource: Writing a description. Research in the Teaching of English, 32, 182-211.
24. Sirc, G. (1995). The twin worlds of electronic conferencing. Computers and Composition, 12, 265-278.
25. Sirc, G., & Reynolds, T. (1990). The face of collaboration in the networked writing classroom. Computers and Composition, 7, 53-70.
26. Spear, K. I. (1988). Sharing writing: Peer response groups in English classes. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
27. Stroble, E. J. (1988, April). A look at writers' comments shared on computer screens: Can electronic mail facilitate peer group response? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 297 723).
28. Taylor, P. (1992). Social epistemic rhetoric and chaotic discourse. In G. E. Hawisher & P. LeBlanc (Eds.), Re-imagining computers and composition: Teaching and research in the virtual age (pp. 131-148). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
29. Thompson, D. (1993). One ENFI path: From Galludet to distance learning. In B. Bruce, J. K. Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 210-227). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Vande Kopple, W. J. (1992). Noun phrases and the style of scientific discourse. In S. P. Witte, N. Nakadate, & R. D. Cherry (Eds.), A rhetoric of doing: Essays on written discourse in honor of James L. Kinneavy (pp. 328-348). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
31. Word 98 for the Macintosh [Computer program]. (1998). Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation.
32. Yates, S. (1996). Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 29-46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33. Zappen, J. P., Gurak, L. J., & Doheny-Farina, S. (1997). Rhetoric, community and cyberspace. Rhetoric Review, 15, 400-419.