Effects of Talents Unlimited Counseling on Gifted/Learning Disabled Students

Gifted Education International

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 144-164

  Olenchak, F Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650262044     PISSN: 02614294     EISSN: 20479077     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026142940902500205     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Arlin ML, Hills D, (1976). Arlin-Hills attitude surveys. St. Louis: Psychologists and Educators.
2. Baum S., (1984). Meeting the needs of learning disabled gifted students. Roeper Review, 7, 16–19.
3. Baum S., (1988). An enrichment program for gifted learning disabled students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 226–230.
4. Baum S. M., Cooper C. R., Neu T. W., (2001). Dual differentiation: An approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in School, 38, 477–490.
5. Baum S., Owen S.V., (1988). High ability/learning disabled students: How are they different? Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 321–326.
6. Baum S., Owen S.V., Dixon J., (1991). To be gifted and learning disabled: From identification to practical intervention strategies. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
7. Boodoo G.M., Bradley C.L., Frontera R.L., Pitts J.R., Wright L.B., (1989). A survey of procedures used for identifying gifted learning disabled children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 110–114.
8. Bryan T.H., Bryan J.H., (1986). Understanding learning disabilities. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
9. Butler-Por N., (1987). Under achievement in school: Issues and intervention. New York: Wiley.
10. Coleman J., Fults B., (1982). Self-concept and gifted classroom: The role of social comparisons. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(3), 116–120.
11. Covington M.V., (1984). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and applications. Elementary School Journal, 85, 5–20.
12. Ellis E.S., Deshler D.D., Schumaker J.B., (1989). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities to generate and use task-specific strategies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(2), 108–119,130.
13. Emerick L.J., (1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students' perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(3), 140–146.
14. Glesne C., (2005). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15. Guilford J.P., (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw Hill.
16. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Public Law 108–446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
17. Janos P.M., Robinson N.M., (1985). The performance of students in a program of radical acceleration at the university level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(4), 175–179.
18. Karnes F., Wherry J., (1981). Self-concepts of gifted students as measured by the Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale. Psychological Reports, 40,111–116.
19. Kavale K.A., Forness S.R., (2000). What definitions of learning disability say and don't say. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 239–256.
20. Kolloff P.B., Moore A.D., (1989). Effects of summer programs on the self-concepts of gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12(4), 268–276.
21. LeCompte M. D., Preissle J., (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
22. Merriam S. B., (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. McCoach D.B., Kehle T.J., Bray M.A., Siegle D., (2001). Best practices in the identification of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38(5), 403–411.
24. Montague M., (1991). Gifted and learning-disabled gifted students' knowledge and use of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 14, 393–411.
25. Moon S.M., Reis S.M., (2004). Acceleration and twice exceptional students. In Colangelo N., Assouline S.G., Gross M.U.M., (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (Vol. 2) (pp. 109–120). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin and Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
26. National Education Association (2006). The twice-exceptional dilemma. Retrieved April 22, 2008, from http://www.nea.org/specialed/images/twice-exceptional.pdf
27. Newman J.L., (2005). Talents and Type Ills: The effects of the Talents Unlimited model on creative productivity in gifted youngsters. Roeper Review, 27(2), 84–90.
28. Nielsen E., (2002). Gifted students with learning disabilities: Recommendations for identification and programming. Exceptionality, 10, 93–111.
29. Olenchak ER., (1988). The schoolwide enrichment model in elementary schools: A study of implementation stages and the effects on educational excellence. In Renzulli J., (Ed.), Technical report on research studies relating to the revolving door identification model (2nd ed.) (pp. 201–247). Storrs, CT: The University of Connecticut, Bureau of Educational Research.
30. Olenchak F.R., (1990). School change through gifted education: Effects on elementary students' attitudes toward learning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 66–78.
31. Olenchak F.R., (1994). Talent development: Accommodating the social and emotional needs of secondary gifted/learning disabled students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5(3), 40–52.
32. Olenchak F.R., (1995). Effects of enrichment on gifted/learning disabled students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 385–399.
33. Olenchak F.R., Reis S.M., (2002). Gifted students with learning disabilities. In Neihart M., Reis S.M., Robinson N.M., Moon S.M., (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 177–192). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
34. Olenchak F.R., Renzulli J.S., (1989). The effectiveness of the schoolwide enrichment model on selected aspects of elementary school change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 36–46.
35. Olszewski-Kubilius P.M., Kulieke M.J., Willis G.B., Krasney N.S., (1989). An analysis of the validity of SAT entrance scores for accelerated classes. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13(1), 37–54.
36. Patton M. Q., (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Piers E.V., (1984). Piers-Harris children's self-concept scale: Revised manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
38. Reis S.M., McCoach D.B., (2002). Underachievement in gifted and talented students with special needs. Exceptionality, 10, 113–125.
39. Renzulli J.S., Reis S.M., (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
40. Rimm S., Olenchak RR., (1991). How FPS helps underachieving gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 14(2), 19–22.
41. Schlichter C.L., Palmer W.R., (Eds.) (1993). Thinking smart: A primer of the talents unlimited model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
42. Schlichter C. L., Palmer W. R., (2002). Talents unlimited: Thinking skills instruction as enrichment for all students. Research in the Schools, 9(2), 53–60.
43. Schunk D.H., (1989). Self-efficacy and cognitive achievement: Implications for students with learning problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(1), 14–22.
44. Seligman M.E.R., (1992). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
45. Seligman M.E.P., (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In Snyder C.R., Lopez S.J., (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 3–12). New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Spradley J.P., (1980). Participant observation. San Francisco; Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
47. Stake R., (1995). The art of case research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Supple P., (1990). Reaching the gifted under achiever. New York: Teachers College Press.
49. Suter D.P., Wolf J.S., (1987). Issues in the identification and programming of the gifted/learning disabled child. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 227–237.
50. Taylor C. W., (1968). Cultivating new talents: A way to reach the educationally deprived. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 83–90.
51. Taylor C. W., (1986). Cultivating simultaneous student growth in both multiple creative talents and knowledge. In Renzulli J. S., (Ed.), Systems and Models for Developing Programs for the Gifted and Talented (pp. 307–350). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
52. Thurstone L.L., (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago, Press.
53. Webb J.T., Amend E.R., Webb N.E., Goerss J., Beljan P., Olenchak F.R., (2005). Misdiagnosis and dual diagnoses of gifted children and adults: ADHD, bipolar, OCD, Asperger's, depression, and other disorders. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
54. Wechsler D., (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-4th edition (WISC-IV®). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
55. Wilson B.L., Firestone W.A., Herriott R.E., (1985). School assessment survey (SAS). Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
56. Wren C., (2000). Hanging by a twig: Understanding and counseling adults with learning disabilities and ADD. New York: W.W. Norton.
57. Yin R. K., (2002). Applications of case study research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.