Talents and type iiis: The effects of the talents unlimited model on creative productivity in gifted youngsters

Roeper Review

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 84-90

  Newman, Jane L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007088812     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190509554295     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barron, F. (1963). Creativity and psychological health. Princeton, NJ: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2. Beyer, B. K. (1987). Practical strategies for the teaching of thinking. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Bloom, B. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.
4. Bloom, B. S., & Sosniak, L. A. (1981). Talent development vs. schooling. Educational Leadership, 38, 86-94.
5. Bogdan, R. C, & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Burns, D. E. (1987). The effects of group training activities on students' creative productivity (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 3072A.
7. Burns, D. E. (1990). Pathways to investigative skills. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
8. Delisle, J. R. (1982). The revolving door model of identification and programming for the academically gifted: The correlates of creative production (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 1588A.
9. Ebel, R. L. (1951). Estimation of the reality of ratings. Psychometrika, 16, 407-424.
10. Gubbins, E. J. (1982). Revolving door identification model: Characteristics of talent pool students (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 2630A.
11. Hébert, T. P. (1992). Creative productivity: Who gets involved? Who benefits? Gifted Child Today, 15 (6), 8-13.
12. Hébert, T. P. (1993). Reflections at graduation: The long-term impact of elementary school: Experiences in creative productivity. Roeper Review, 16, 22-28.
13. MacKinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 273-281.
14. Newman J. L. (in press). Talents and Type IIIs. Mobile, AL: Talents Unlimited. (Original work published in 1991)
15. Nicholls, J. C. (1972). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful: The concept of creativity as a normally distributed trait. American Psychologist, 27, 717-727.
16. Olenchak, F. R. (1988). The effectiveness of the Schoolwide Enrichment Model on selected aspects of elementary school change (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 1100A.
17. Reis, S. M. (1981). An analysis of the productivity of gifted students participating in programs using the Revolving Door Identification Model (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 123A.
18. Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1991). The assessment of creative products in programs for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(3), 128-134.
19. Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The Enrichment Triad Model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
20. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180-184, 261.
21. Renzulli, J. S. (1983). Guiding the gifted in the pursuit of real problems: The transformed role of the teacher. Journal of Creative Behavior, 17 (1), 49-59.
22. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
23. Renzulli, J. S. (1993). Schools are places for talent development: Applying –gifted education— know-how to total school improvement. The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 2 (2), 16-24.
24. Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
25. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
26. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1986). Schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
27. Renzulli J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1994). Research related to the Schoolwide Enrichment Model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(1), 7-20.
28. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
29. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1998). Talent development through curriculum differentiation. National Association of Secondary School Principals, 82, 61-75.
30. Renzulli J. M., & Reis, S. M. (1999). Research relating to the development of creative productivity using the Enrichment Triad Model. In A. S. Fishkin, B. Crammond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth: Research and methods (pp. 367-387). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
31. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2002). What is schoolwide enrichment? Gifted Child Today, 25, 18-27.
32. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2003). Developing high potentials for innovation in young people through the Schoolwide Enrichment Model. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International Handbook on Innovation (pp. 333-346). New York: Elsevier Science.
33. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2003). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: Developing creative and productive giftedness. In N. Colangelo and G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (pp. 184-203). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
34. Roe, A. (1952). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.
35. Schack, G. (1986). Creative productivity and self-efficacy in children (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 905B.
36. Schlichter, C. L. (1986). Talents unlimited: Applying the multiple talent approach in mainstream and gifted programs. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for gifted and talented (pp. 352-390). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
37. Schlichter, C. L., & Palmer, W. R. (2002). Talents unlimited: Thinking skills instruction as enrichment for all students. Research in the Schools, 9(2), 53-60.
38. Starko, A. J. (1986). The effects of the revolving door identification model on creative productivity and self-efficacy (Doctoral dissertation: The University of Connecticut, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 339A.
39. Taylor, C. W. (1986). Cultivating simultaneous student growth in both multiple creative talents and knowledge. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for gifted and talented (pp. 306-351). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
40. Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of genius: The gifted group at midlife. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
41. Tomlinson, C. A. (1994). Gifted learners too: A possible dream? Educational Leadership, 52, 64-68.
42. Zuckerman, H. (1979). The scientific elite: Nobel Laureates' mutual influences. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 241-252). New York: Pergamon Press.