Reasons, values and agent-relativity

Dialectica

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 503-528

  Wallace, R Jay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650218198     PISSN: 00122017     EISSN: 17468361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2010.01246.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. CRISP, R. 2005, 'Value, Reasons and the Structure of Justification: How to Avoid Passing the Buck', Analysis 65, pp. 80-85.
2. DANCY, J. 2000, 'Should we Pass the Buck?' in: A. O'Hear, ed., Philosophy, the Good, the True and the Beautiful, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159-175.
3. GEACH, P. 1956, 'Good and Evil', Analysis 17, pp. 33-42.
4. HEUER, U. 2006, 'Explaining Reasons: Where Does the Buck Stop?', Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, vol. 1, no. 3, URL=〈http://www.jesp. org〉.
5. MOORE, G. E. 1993, Principia Ethica, ed. by T. Baldwin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. NAGEL, T. 1989, The View from Nowhere, New York: Oxford University Press.
7. OLSON, J. 2004, 'Buck-Passing and the Wrong Kind of Reasons', Philosophical Quarterly 54, pp. 295-300.
8. PARFIT, D. 2001, 'Rationality and Reasons', in: D. Egonsson, J. Josefsson, B. Petersson and T. Rønnow-Rasmussen, eds, Exploring Practical Philosophy: From Action to Values, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 17-39.
9. RABINOWICZ, W. and RøNNOW-RASMUSSEN, T. 2004, 'The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Proattitudes and Value', Ethics 114, pp. 392-423.
10. RAZ, J. 1999, Engaging Reason, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. SCANLON, T. M. 1998, What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. SCANLON, T. M. 2002, 'Reasons, Responsibility, and Reliance: Replies to Wallace, Dworkin, and Deigh', Ethics 112, pp. 507-528.
13. SCHEFFLER, S. 2001, 'Relationships and Responsibilities', reprinted in his Boundaries and Allegiances, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 97-110.
14. SCHROEDER, M. 2007, 'Teleology, Agent-Relative Value, and the "Good"', Ethics 117, pp. 265-295.
15. SEN, A. 2000, 'Consequential Evaluation and Practical Reason', Journal of Philosophy 97, pp. 477-502.
16. SIDGWICK, H. 1981, The Methods of Ethics, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
17. SMITH, M. 1994, The Moral Problem, Oxford: Blackwell.
18. SMITH, M. 2003, 'Neutral and Relative Value after Moore', Ethics 113, pp. 576-598.
19. SUIKKANEN, J. 2009, 'Consequentialism, Constraints and the Good-Relative-to: A Reply to Mark Schroeder', Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, discussion note, March 2009, URL=〈http://www.jesp.org〉.
20. THOMSON, J. J. 1997, 'The Right and the Good', Journal of Philosophy 94, pp. 273-298.
21. THOMSON, J. J. 2001, Goodness and Advice, ed. by A. Gutmann, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
22. THOMSON, J. J. 2008, Normativity, Chicago: Open Court.
23. WALLACE, R. J. 2002, 'Scanlon's Contractualism', Ethics 112, pp. 429-470.
24. WILLIAMS, B. 1973, 'A Critique of Utilitarianism', in: J. J. C. Smart and B. Williams, eds, Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 77-150.
25. WILLIAMS, B. 1985, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.