Value, reasons and the structure of justification: How to avoid passing the buck

Analysis

Volumn 65, Issue 285, 2005, Pages 80-85

  Crisp, Roger ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 51849084742     PISSN: 00032638     EISSN: 14678284     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2005.00528.x     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Blackburn, S. 1981. Rule-following and moral realism. In Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule, ed. S. Holtzman and C. Leich, 163-87. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
2. Dancy, J. 2000. Should we pass the buck?. In The Good, the True and the Beautiful, ed. A. O'Hear, 159-73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
3. Ewing, A. C. 1947. The Definition of Good. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
4. Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth Penguin
5. Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
6. Parfit, Derek. 2001. Rationality and reasons. In Exploring Practical Rasmussen, Aldershot: Ashgate Philosophy: From Action to Values, ed. D. Egonnson, J. Josefsson, B. Petersson and T. Rønnow-Rasmussen, 17-39. Aldershot: Ashgate
7. Rabinowicz, W. and T. Rønnow-Rasmussen 2004. The strike of the demon: on fitting pro-attitudes and value. Ethics 114: 391-423
8. Scanlon, T. M. 1998. On What We Owe to Each Other. Harvard: Belknap Press
9. Scanlon, T. M. 2002. Reasons, responsibility, and reliance: replies to Deigh Wallace, Dworkin, and Deigh. Ethics 112: 507-28
10. Stratton-Lake, P. 2002. Introduction. In Ethical Intuitionism Re-evaluations, ed. P. Stratton-Lake, 1-28. Oxford: Clarendon Press
11. Wallace, R. Jay. 2002. Scanlon's contractualism. Ethics 112: 429-70