Figures of merit to compare distributed linear inverse solutions

Brain Topography

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 117-124

  De Peralta Menendez, Rolando Grave ^a,b   Gonzalez Andino, Sara L ^a   Lütkenhöner, Bernd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Distributed solutions; Distributed source models; Figures of merit; Inverse problem

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; DIPOLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ERROR; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0030460968     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01200711     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Backus, G.E. and Gilbert, J.F. Numerical applications of a formalism for geophysical inverse problems. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1967, 13:247-276.
2. Backus, G.E. and Gilbert, J.F. The resolving power of gross earth data. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1968, 16:169-205.
3. Backus, G.E. and Gilbert, J.F. Uniquenness in the inversion of gross earth data. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 1970, 266:123-192.
4. Bertero, M, De Mol, C. and Pike, E.R. Linear inverse problems with discrete data. I: General formulation and singular system analysis. Inverse Problem, 1985, 1: 301-330.
5. Brenner, D., Williamson, S.J. and Kauffman, L. Visually evoked magnetic fields of the human brain. Science, 1975, 190: 480-481.
6. Greenblatt, R.E. Probabilistic reconstruction of multiple sources in the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem. Inverse Problems, 1993, 9 : 271-284.
7. Hämäläinen, M.S. and Ilmoniemi, R.J. Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: Estimates of Current Distributions. , Technical Report TKK-F-A559, Helsinski University of Technology, 1984.
8. Hämäläinen, M. Interpretation of Neuromagnetic measurements: Modeling and Statistical Considerations. Ph. D. Thesis, Espoo, Finland, 1987.
9. Ilmoniemi, R.J. Estimates of Neuronal Current Distributions. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1991, Suppl, 491: 80-87.
10. ISBET Newsletter. No 5. November 1994. Ed. W. Skrandies.
11. Jackson, D.D. Interpretation of Inaccurate, Insufficient and Inconsistent data. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. soc., 1972, 28:97-110.
12. Menke, W. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete inverse theory. Academic Press, 1984.
13. O'Sullivan F. A Statistical perspective on ill-posed inverse problems. 1986, 1. No. 4, 502-527.
14. Peng, C., Rodi, W. and Toksoz, M.N. Smoothest-model reconstruction from projections. Inverse Problem, 1993, 9:339-354.