Choosing and using multiple information sources: Some new findings and emergent issues

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 238-242

  Goldman, Susan R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Information relevance; Integrating sources; Sourcing evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650174291     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.006     Document Type: Note

References (23)

1. Braasch J.L.G., Lawless K.A., Goldman S.R., Manning F., Gomez K.W., MacLeod S. Evaluating search results: an empirical analysis of middle school students' use of source attributes to select useful sources. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2009, 41:63-82.
2. Bråten I., Strømsø H.I., Salmerón L. Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction 2011, 21(2):180-192.
3. Chinn C.A., Malhotra B.A. Epistemologically authentic reasoning in schools: a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education 2002, 86:175-218.
4. Gerjets P., Kammerer Y., Werner B. Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during Web search: integrating concurrent thinking-aloudprotocols and eye-trackingdata. Learning and Instruction 2011, 21(2):220-231.
5. Goldman S.R. Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts. Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational research 2004, 313-347. Information Age, Greenwich, CT. N. Shuart-Ferris, D.M. Bloome (Eds.).
6. Goldman S.R., Lawless K.A., Gomez K.W., Braasch J.L.G., MacLeod S., Manning F. Literacy in the digital world: comprehending and learning from multiple sources. Bringing reading research to life 2010, 257-284. Guilford, New York. M.C. McKeown, L. Kucan (Eds.).
7. Goldman, S. R., Meyerson, P., Wolfe, M. B. W., Mayfield, C., Coté, N. C., & Bloome, D. (1999, April). "If it says so in the text book, it must be true" - Multiple sources in the middle school social studies classroom. Paper presented at the Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
8. Goldman, S. R., Ozuru, Y., Braasch, J. L. G., Manning, F. H., Lawless, K. A., Gomez, K. W., & Slanovits, M. J. (in press). Literacies for learning: a multiple source comprehension illustration. In N. Stein (Ed.), Development science goes to school. New York: Routledge.
9. Guthrie J.T. Locating information in documents: examination of a cognitive model. Reading Research Quarterly 1988, 23:178-199.
10. Kienhues D., Stadtler M., Bromme R. Dealing with conflicting or consistent medical information on the Web: when expert information breeds laypersons' doubts about experts. Learning and Instruction 2011, 21(2):193-204.
11. Lawless, K. A., Goldman, S. R., Gomez, K., Manning, F., & Braasch, J. (in press). Assessing multiple source comprehension through evidence centered design. In J. P. Sabatini, & E. R. Albro (Eds.), Assessing reading in the 21st century: Aligning and applying advances in the reading and measurement sciences. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
12. Manning F.H., Goldman S.R., Ozuru Y., Lawless K.A., Gomez K., Braasch J.L.G. Students' analysis of multiple sources for agreements and disagreements. International perspectives in the learning sciences: Creating a learning world 2008, Vol. 2:19-26. Lulu, Utrecht, The Netherlands, online ed. G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P.A. Kirschner, F.J. Prins (Eds.).
13. Mosenthal P. Understanding the strategies of document literacy and their conditions of use. Journal of Educational Psychology 1996, 88:314-332.
14. Rouet J.-F. The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning 2006, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
15. Rouet J.-F., Britt M.A., Mason R.A., Perfetti C.A. Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology 1996, 88:478-493.
16. Rouet J.-F., Favart M., Britt M.A., Perfetti C.A. Studying and using multiple documents in history: effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction 1997, 15:85-106.
17. Rouet J.-F., Ros C., Goumi A., Macedo-Rouet M., Dinet J. The influence of surface and deep cues on primary and secondary school students' assessment of relevance in Web menus. Learning and Instruction 2011, 21(2):205-219.
18. Songer N.B. BioKIDS: an animated conversation on the development of curricular activity structures for inquiry science. Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences 2006, 355-369. Cambridge University Press, New York. R. Keith Sawyer (Ed.).
19. Songer, N. B., Myers, P., & Gotwals, A. W. (2007, September). DeepThink: fostering and measuring learning progressions focused on deep thinking about biodiversity. Poster presented at the Principal Investigators Meeting of the National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
20. VanSledright B. Confronting history's interpretive paradox while teaching fifth graders to investigate the past. American Educational Research Journal 2002, 39:1089-1115.
21. VanSledright B. In search of America's past: Learning to read history in elementary school 2002, Teachers College Press, New York.
22. Wiley J., Goldman S.R., Graesser A.C., Sanchez C.A., Ash I., Hemmerich J. Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal 2009, 46:1060-1160.
23. Wineburg S.S. The cognitive representation o fhistorical texts. Teaching and learning in history 1994, 85-135. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. G. Leinhardt, I.L. Beck, C. Stainton (Eds.).