Showing automatically generated students' conceptual models to students and teachers

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 47-72

  Pérez Marín, Diana ^a   Pascual Nieto, Ismael ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

e assessment; e learning; free text scoring; Open student models

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650149528     PISSN: 15604292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/JAI-2010-0002     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aguilar, G., & Kaijiri, K. (2007). Design overview of an adaptive computer-based assessment system. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 14, 116-130.
2. Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, 2nd. ed. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
3. Birenbaum, M., Tatsuoka, K., & Gutvirtz, Y. (1992). Effects of response format on diagnostic assessment of scholastic achievement. Applied psychological measurement, 16(4), 353-363.
4. Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E., & Weber, G. (1996). ELM-ART: An intelligent tutoring system on World Wide Web. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier & A. Lesgold (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 261-269). Berlin, Springer Verlag.
5. Bull, S., Brna, P., & Pain, H. (1995). Extending the scope of the student model. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 5, 45-65.
6. Bull, S., & Pain, H. (1995). Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me?: Inspecting and questioning the student model. In J. Greer (Ed.) Proceedings of the World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 501-508). Charlottesville, VA, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
7. Bull, S., & Brna, P. (1997). What does Susan know that Paul doesn't? (and vice versa): Contributing to each other's student model. In Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence of Education Conference (pp. 568-570). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press.
8. Bull, S., & Nghiem, T. (2002). Helping learners to understand themselves with a learner model open to students, peers and instructors. In P. Brna & V. Dimitrova (Eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Individual and Group Modelling Methods that Help Learners Understand Themselves at the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 5-13). Berlin: Springer.
9. Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2007). Student models that invite the learner in: The SMILI: () open learner modelling framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(2), 89-120.
10. Czarkowski, M., Kay, J., & Potts, S. (2005). Web framework for scrutable adaptation. In J. Kay, A. Lum & D. Zapata-Rivera (Eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection at the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 11-18). On-line at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.167. 2303&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=18 (last visit on October 4th, 2010).
11. Dimitrova, V., Self, J., & Brna, P. (2001). Applying interactive open learner models to learning technical terminology. In M. Bauer, P. J. Gmytrasiewicz & J. Vassileva (Eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 148-157). Berlin: Springer.
12. Dimitrova, V. (2003). STyLE-OLM: Interactive Open Learner Modelling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 13(1), 35-78.
13. Guetl, C., Dreher, H., & Williams, R. (2005). E-tester: A computer-based tool for auto-generated question and answer assessment. In G. Richards (Ed.) Proceedings of the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2929-2936). Vancouver, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
14. Kay, J. (1995). The um toolkit for cooperative user modelling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(3), 149-196.
15. Kravcik, M., & Specht, M. (2004). Flexible navigation support in the WINDS learning environment for architecture and design. In P. De Bra & W. Nejdl (Eds.) Proceedings of the Adaptive Hypermedia Conference (pp. 156-165). Berlin: Springer.
16. McGrath, P. (2003). Assessing students: Computer simulation vs MCQs. In M. Danson (Ed.) Proceedings of the 7th Computer Assisted Assessment Conference (pp. 243-246), Loughborough University, U. K.
17. Mitchell, T., Aldridge, N., Williamson, W., & Broomhead, P. (2003). Computer based testing of medical knowledge. In M. Danson (Ed.) Proceedings of the 7th Computer Assisted Assessment Conference (pp. 249-267), Loughborough University, U. K.
18. Mitrovic, A., & Martin, B. (2002). Evaluating the Effects of Open Student Models on Learning. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (pp. 296-305). Berlin:Springer-Verlag.
19. Palmer, K., & Richardson, P. (2003). On-line assessment and free-response input - a pedagogic and technical model for squaring the circle. In M. Danson (Ed.) Proceedings of the 7th Computer Assisted Assessment Conference (pp. 289-300), Loughborough University, U. K.
20. Pérez-Marín, D., Alfonseca, E., & Rodríguez, P. (2006). A free-text scoring system that generates conceptual models of the students knowledge with the aid of clarifying questions. In L. Aroyo & D. Dicheva (Eds.) Proceedings of the International WorkShop Semantic Web technologies for E-Learning (pp. 113-114), Dublin, Ireland.
21. Pérez-Marín, D., Pascual-Nieto, I., Alfonseca, E.; Anguiano, E., & Rodriguez, P. (2007). A study on the impact of the use of an automatic and adaptive free-text assessment system during a university course. In J. Fong & P. Wang (Eds.) Blended Learning (pp. 186-195). Prentice Hall, Pearson, U. K.
22. Pérez-Marín, D. (2009). Adaptive Computer Assisted Assessment of Free-text Students' Answers: An Approach to Automatically Generate Students' Conceptual Models. VDM Verlag, Germany.
23. Quinlan, J. (1993). C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. San Francisco, U. S. A.
24. Rueda, U., Larrañaga, M., Elorriaga, J., & Arruarte, A. (2004). Validating DynMap as a mechanism to visualize the student's evolution through the learning process. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 864-866). Berlin: Springer.
25. Sigel, I., (Ed.) (1999). Development of Mental Representations: Theories and Applications. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Zapata-Rivera, J., & Greer, J. (2001). Externalising learner modelling representations. In S. Ainsworth & R. Cox (Eds.) Proceedings of Workshop on External Representations of Artificial Intelligence for Education: Multiple Forms and Multiple Roles (pp. 71-76), San Antonio, Texas.
27. Zapata-Rivera, D., Hansen, E., Shute, V., Underwood, J., & Bauer, M. (2007). Evidence-based approach to interacting with open student models. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(3), 273-303.