Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 46-54

  Andrade, William N ^a   Baxter, Nancy ^a   Semple, John L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL DISEASE; ABDOMINAL INFECTION; ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BREAST AREOLA; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANADA; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; EMOTION; FAT NECROSIS; FEMALE; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; KELOID; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

EID: 0035174472     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200101000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Postmastectomy attitudes in women who wear external breast prostheses compared to those who have undergone breast reconstructions
2. Body image, self-concept, and self-esteem in women who had a mastectomy and either wore an external prosthesis or had breast reconstruction and women who had not experienced mastectomy
3. Body image in women treated for breast cancer
4. Partial mastectomy and breast reconstruction: A comparison of their effects on psychosocial adjustment, body image, and sexuality
5. Psychologic and cosmetic self-assessments of breast conserving therapy with mastectomy and immediate reconstruction
6. The psychological impact of immediate breast reconstruction for women with early breast cancer
7. Effects of immediate breast reconstruction on psychosocial morbidity after mastectomy
8. Psychosocial correlates of immediate versus delayed reconstruction of the breast
9. Psychological evaluation of patients undergoing breast reconstruction using two different methods: Autologous tissues versus prostheses
10. Postmastectomy reconstruction: Comparative analysis of the psychosocial, functional, and cosmetic effects of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap versus breast implant reconstruction
11. Mastectomy with and without immediate reconstruction using a musculocutaneous flap
12. Impact of event scale: A measure of subjective stress
13. Impact of Event Scale: A cross-validation study and some empirical evidence supporting a conceptual model of stress response syndromes
14. An audit of outcome including patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction performed by breast surgeons
15. Illness-related and treatment-related factors in psychological adjustment to breast cancer
16. Treatment considerations in postmastectomy reconstruction: Their relative importance and relationship to patient satisfaction
17. The management of breast cancer with immediate or delayed reconstruction
18. The sooner the better: A study of psychological factors in women undergoing immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction
19. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction
20. Psychosocial and surgical aspects of breast reconstruction
21. Autogenous tissue reconstruction in the mastectomy patient
22. Postmastectomy complications in breast reconstruction
23. The ramifications of immediate reconstruction in the management of breast cancer
24. TRAM flap breast reduction after radiation treatment
25. TRAM flap anatomy correlated with a 10-year clinical experience with 556 patients
26. Patient acceptance of immediate reconstruction following mastectomy
27. Psychosocial issues in breast reconstruction. Intrapsychic, interpersonal, and practical concerns
28. Psychological response to breast reconstruction
29. Breast reconstruction. Update of psychosocial and pragmatic concerns
30. Return of sensibility and final outcome of breast reconstructions using free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps
31. Reasons why women who have mastectomy decide to have or not to have breast reconstruction
32. Abdominal wall function after rectus abdominis transfer
33. Abdominal function after pedicled TRAM flap surgery
34. Assessment of the abdominal wall after pedicled TRAM flap surgery: 5- to 7-year follow-up of 150 consecutive patients