Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 20, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1642-1655

  Eisikovits, Zvi ^a   Koren, Chaya ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^b ASHKELON ACADEMIC COLLEGE   (Israel)

Author keywords

aging; comparative analysis; constant comparison; data collection and management; primary partner; qualitative; relationships; research

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERVIEW; ISRAEL; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SPOUSE; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; ISRAEL; MALE; NARRATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SPOUSES;

EID: 78650135871     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: 15527557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732310376520     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allan, G. (1980). A note on interviewing spouses together. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42 (1). 205-210.
2. Arskey, H. (1996). Collecting data through joint interviews, Social Research Update, 15, 1-8.
3. Band-Winterstein, T., & Eisikovits, Z. (2009). Aging out of violence: The multiple faces of intimate violence over the life span. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 164-180. doi:10.1177/ 1049732308329305
4. Bollnow, O.F. (1967). Lived-space. In N. Lawrence & D. O'Connor (Eds.), Readings in existential phenomenology (pp. 178-186). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Brannan, J. (1988). Research note: The study of sensitive subjects. Sociological Review, 36 (3). 553-563.
6. Brodsky, J., Shnoor, Y., Be'er, S., & Rotem, D. (2006). The elderly in Israel. Statistical abstract. Jerusalem, Israel: MASHAV, JDC-Brookdale Institute, and ESHEL.
7. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Davidson, K. (2002). Gender differences in new partnership choices and constraints for older widows and widowers. Ageing International, 27 (4). 43-60.
9. Davidson, K. (2004). Gender differences in new partnership choices and constraints for older widows and widowers. In K. Davidson and G. Fennell (Eds.) Intimacy in later life (pp. 65-83). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
10. De Jong Gierveld, J. (2002). The dilemma of repartnering: Considerations of older men and women entering new relationships in later life. Ageing International, 27 (4). 61-78.
11. De Jong Gierveld, J. (2004). Remarriage, unmarried cohabitation, living apart together: Partner relationships following bereavement or divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 236-243.
12. De Jong Gierveld, J., & Peeters, A. (2003). The interweaving of repartnered older adults' lives with children and siblings. Ageing and Society, 23, 187-205. doi:10.1017/ S0144686X02001095
13. Denzin, N.K. (1989). The research act (3 rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. Ellenberger, H.F. (1958). A clinical introduction to psychiatric phenomenology and existential analysis. In R. May, E. Angel, & H. F. Ellenberger (Eds.), Existence: A new dimension in psychiatry and psychology (pp. 92-124). New York: Basic Books.
15. Forbat, L. (2003). Relationship difficulties in dementia care: A discursive analysis of two women's accounts. Dementia, 2 (1). 67-84.
16. Forbat, L., & Henderson, J. (2003). Stuck in the middle with you: The ethics and process of qualitative research with two people in an intimate relationship. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 1453-1462. doi:10.1177/ 1049732303255836
17. Ghazanfareeon-Karlsson, S., & Borell, K. (2004). Intimacy and autonomy, gender and ageing: Living apart together. In K. Davidson and G. Fennell (Eds.) Intimacy in later life (pp. 1-18). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
18. Glaser, B.G. (1969). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. In G. J. McCall & J. L. Simmons (Eds.), Issues in participant observation (pp. 216-228). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19. Gronn, P. (1999). Substituting for leadership: The neglected role of the leadership couple. Leadership Quarterly, 10 (1). 41-62.
20. Harkness-Hodgson, J., Garcia, K., & Tyndall, L. (2004). Parkinson's disease and the couple relationship: A qualitative analysis, Families, Systems & Health, 22 (1). 101-118. doi:10.1037/1091-7527.22.1.101
21. Headland, T. N., Pike, K. L., & Harris, M. (Eds.). (1990). Emics and etics: The insiders/outsider debate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Hellstrom, I., Nolan, M., & Lundh, U. (2005 a). We do things together. Dementia, 4 (1). 7-22.
23. Hellstrom, I., Nolan, M., & Lundh, U. (2005 b). Awareness context theory and dynamics of dementia. Dementia, 4 (2). 269-295.
24. Holmberg, D., Orbuch, T.L., & Veroff, J. (2004). Thrice told tales: Married couples tell their stories. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Karlsson, S.G., & Borell, K. (2002). Intimacy and autonomy, gender and ageing: Living apart together. Ageing International, 27 (4). 11-26.
26. Kestin van den Hoonard, D. (2002). Attitudes of older widows and widowers in New Brunswick, Canada towards new partnerships. Ageing International, 27 (4). 79-92.
27. Koren, C. (2008). The meaning of second couple-hood in old age from a dyadic perspective. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Social Work, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Israel. [Hebrew]
28. Koren, C., & Eisikovits, Z. (2010). Life beyond the planned script: Secrecy and accounts of elders who created second couplehood in old age. Manuscript submitted for publication.
29. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Marshall, C., & Rossman, B. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Morris, S. (2001). Joint and individual interviewing in the context of cancer. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 553-567.
32. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Olson, M.M., Russell, C.S., Higgins-Kessler, M., & Miller, R.B. (2002). Emotional process following disclosure of extramarital affair. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28 (4). 423-434.
34. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3 rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Pearce, A., Clare, L., & Pistrang, N. (2002). Managing sense of self. Dementia, 1 (2). 173-192.
36. Reed, J.M. (2006). Not crossing the extra line: How cohabitors with children view their unions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 68, 1117-1131.
37. Ross, M., & Holmberg, D. (1992). Are wives' memories for events in relationships more vivid than their husbands' memories ? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 585-604. doi:10.1177/0265407592094007
38. Rossman, B., & Rallis, S. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Schlesinger, R.A., & Schlesinger, B. (2004, June). Canadian- Jewish seniors: Marriage/cohabitation after age 65. Paper presented at the 10th Biennial Jerusalem Conference in Canadian Studies at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
40. Schutz, A. (1970). On phenomenology and social relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Shin, K.R., Kim, M.Y., & Chung, S.E. (2009). Methods and strategies utilized in published qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 850-858. doi:10.1177/1049732309335857
42. Shotter, J. (1995). In conversation: Joint action, shared intentionality and ethics. Theory & Psychology, 5 (1). 49-73. doi:10.1177/0959354395051003
43. Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Spinelli, E. (1989). The interpreted world: An introduction to phenomenological psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45. Stamp, G.H. (1994). The appropriation of the parental role through communication during the transition to parenthood. Communication Monographs, 61, 89-112.
46. Stevens, N. (2002). Re-engaging: New partnerships in late-life widowhood. Ageing International, 27 (4). 27-42.
47. Stevens, N. (2004). Re-engaging: New partnership in later-life widowhood. In K. Davidson and G. Fennell (Eds.), Intimacy in later life (pp. 47-63). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
48. Svanstrom, R., & Dahlberg, K. (2004). Living with dementia yields a heteronomous and lost existence. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 26 (6). 671-687. doi:10.1177/0193945904265920
49. Thompson, L., & Walker, A.J. (1982). The dyad as the unit of analysis: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44 (4). 889-900.
50. Veroff, J., Sutherland, L., Chadiha, L., & Ortega, R. (1993). Predicting marital quality with narrative assessments of marital experience. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 326-337.
51. Walker, K.L., & Dickson, F.C. (2004). An exploration of illness-related narratives in marriage: The identification of illness-identity scripts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21 (4). 527-544. doi:10.1177/0265407504044846
52. Wexler-Sherman, C., & Boss, P. (2007). Spousal dementia care-giving in the context of late-life remarriage. Dementia, 6 (2). 245-270. doi:10.1177/1471301207080367
53. Yardley, L. (2000). Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health, 15, 215-228.