Impact of informed-choice invitations on diabetes screening knowledge, attitude and intentions: An analogue study

BMC Public Health

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Mann, Eleanor ^a   Kellar, Ian ^b   Sutton, Stephen ^b   Kinmonth, Ann Louise ^b   Hankins, Matthew ^c   Griffin, Simon ^d   Marteau, Theresa M ^a  

^a GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c BRIGHTON AND SUSSEX MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^d ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED KINGDOM; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 78650084488     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-768     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. A Raffle J Gray, Screening: Evidence and Practice Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 2007
2. General Medical Council, Seeking Patients' Consent: The Ethical Considerations London: GMC 1998
3. National Screening Committee, 2nd Report of the UK National Screening Committee London, UK: The Stationary Office 2000-Either first page or author must be supplied.
4. Department for Health, Health Act 2009 London, UK: The Stationary Office 2009-Either first page or author must be supplied.
5. Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. H Bekker JG Thornton CM Airey JB Connelly J Hewison MB Robinson J Lilleyman M MacIntosh AJ Maule S Michie, Health Technology Assessment 1999 3 1 1 156 10350446
6. A measure of informed choice. TM Marteau E Dormandy S Michie, Health Expectations 2001 4 2 99 108 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00140.x 11359540
7. Screening for cardiovascular disease: public health imperative or matter for informed choice. TM Marteau AL Kinmonth, British Medical Journal 2002 325 78 80 10.1136/bmj.325.7355.78 12114238
8. Screening adults for type 2 diabetes: a review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. S Norris D Kansagara C Bougatsos R Fu, Annals of Internal Medicine 2008 148 11 855 868 18519931
9. Should we screen for type 2 diabetes? Evaluation against National Screening Committee. NJ Wareham SJ Griffin, British Medical Journal 2001 322 986 988 10.1136/bmj.322.7292.986 11312236
10. Who attends a UK diabetes screening programme? Findings from the ADDITION Cambridge study. LA Sargeant RK Simmons RS Barling R Butler KM Williams AT Prevost AL Kinmonth NJ Wareham SJ Griffin, Diabetic Medicine 27 9 995 1003 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03056.x 20722672
11. The theory of planned behavior. I Ajzen, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991 50 2 179 211 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
12. How well do the theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behaviour predict intentions and attendance at screening programmes? A meta-analysis. R Cooke D French, Psychology & Health 2008 23 7 745 765
13. Evaluation of an informed choice invitation for type 2 diabetes screening. I Kellar S Sutton SJ Griffin AT Prevost AL Kinmonth T Marteau, Patient Education and Counseling 2008 72 232 238 10.1016/j.pec.2008.04.005 18513916
14. Trial Protocol: DICISION: Standard versus informed choice invitations: balancing public health benefits and individual choice. E Mann AT Prevost SJ Griffin I Kellar S Sutton M Parker S Sanderson AL Kinmonth TM Marteau, BMC: Public Health 2009 9 63 1 12 19121216
15. Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): a randomised trial. TM Marteau E Mann AT Prevost J Vasconcelos I Kellar S Sanderson M Parker SJ Griffin S Sutton AL Kinmonth, British Medical Journal 2010 340 2138 10.1136/bmj.c2138 20466791
16. Screening for prostate cancer. S Frankel G Smith J Donovan D Neal, The Lancet 2003 361 9363 1122 1128 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12890-5 (Pubitemid 36369568)
17. Informed Choice in Mammography Screening: A Randomized Trial of a Decision Aid for 70-Year-Old Women. E Mathieu A Barratt HM Davey K McGeechan K Howard N Houssami, Archives of Internal Medicine 2007 167 19 2039 2046 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2039 17954796
18. Randomized trial of a self-administered decision aid for colorectal cancer screening. LJ Trevena L Irwig A Barratt, Journal of Medical Screening 2008 15 2 76 82 10.1258/jms.2008.007110 18573775
19. Patient Education on Prostate Cancer Screening and Involvement in Decision Making. A Krist S Woolf R Johnson J Kerns, The Annals of Family Medicine 2007 5 2 112 119 10.1370/afm.623 (Pubitemid 46513479)
20. Declaration of Helsinki. World Medical Association, 2008 http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf-Either ISSN or Journal title must be supplied.
21. Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: Results of the OXCHECK study after one year. J Muir D Mant L Jones P Yudkin on behalf of the Imperial Cancer Research Fund OXCHECK study group, British Medical Journal 1994 308 308 312 8124120
22. How to improve bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. G Gigerenzer U Hoffrage, Psychological Review 1995 102 4 684 704 10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684
23. Market Research Society, Occupation Groupings: A Job Dictionary Bishop's Stortford, UK: Market Research Society 6 2006-Either first page or author must be supplied.
24. Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. M Browne R Cudeck, Multivariate Behavioral Research 1989 24 4 445 455 10.1207/s15327906mbr2404-4
25. B Byrne, Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2001
26. S067 Age of Household Reference Person (HRP) and dependent children by approximated social grade. Office for National Statistics, 2001 http://www.statistics.gov.uk/StatBase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=7506&More=Y-Either ISSN or Journal title must be supplied.
27. Informed choice in screening programmes: do leaflets help? A critical literature review. R Fox, Journal of Public Health 2006 28 4 309 317 10.1093/pubmed/fdl066 17060352
28. A community-based randomised controlled trial of three different educational resources for men about prostate cancer screening. M Gattellari JE Ward, Patient Education and Counseling 2005 57 2 168 182 10.1016/j.pec.2004.05. 011 15911190
29. Increasing informed uptake and non-uptake of screening: evidence from a systematic review. R Jepson C Forbes A Sowden R Lewis, Health Expectations 2001 4 2 116 130 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00143.x 11359542
30. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. A O'Connor D Stacey V Entwistle H Llewellyn-Thomas D Rovner M Holmes-Rovner V Tait J Tetroe V Fiset M Barry, Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 2003 2 D001431 12804407
31. A predictive study of reasons for attendance and non-attendance at a breast screening programme. G Saidi S Sutton G Bickler, Psychology & Health 1998 13 1 23 33
32. Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial. HC Eborall SJ Griffin AT Prevost AL Kinmonth DP French S Sutton, British Medical Journal 2007 335 7618 486 489 10.1136/bmj.39303.723449.55 17761995
33. The psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes. C Adriaanse F Snoek, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews 2006 22 1 20 25 10.1002/dmrr.590 16142814
34. Multicentre study of surgical complications of colonoscopy. J Garbay B Suc N Rotman G Fourtanier J Escat, British Journal of Surgery 1996 83 1 42 44 10.1002/bjs.1800830112 8653359
35. Anxiety caused by abnormal result of cervical smear test: a controlled trial. C Wilkinson JM Jones J McBride, British Medical Journal 1990 300 6722 440 10.1136/bmj.300.6722.440 2107898