Impact of jail sanctions during drug court participation upon substance abuse treatment completion

Addiction

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 135-142

  Brown, Randall T ^a   Allison, Paul A ^b   Nieto, F Javier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Crime; Criminal behavior; Drug court; Jail

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ARTICLE; DRUG USE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MALE; MANDATORY PROGRAM; OFFENDER; PATIENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIME; TREATMENT FAILURE; UNEMPLOYMENT; UNITED STATES;

CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CRIMINALS; DRUG USERS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MALE; MANDATORY PROGRAMS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT DROPOUTS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT FAILURE; UNEMPLOYMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78650003875     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03102.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Office of National Drug Control P. Enforcement: Drug Courts. Available at: (accessed 18 December 2007). 2007.
2. Simpson D. D., Friend H. J. Legal Status and Long-Term Outcomes for Addicts in the DARP Followup Project. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1988.
3. Lurigio A. J. Drug treatment availability and effectiveness: studies of the general and criminal justice populations. Crim Justice Behav 2000; 27: 495-528.
4. Farabee D., Prendergast M., Anglin M. D. Effectiveness of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Fed Probat 1998; 62: 3-10.
5. Hser Y. I., Maglione M., Polinsky M. L., Anglin M. D. Predicting drug treatment entry among treatment-seeking individuals. J Subst Abuse Treat 1998; 15: 213-20.
6. Anglin M. D., Prendergast M., Farabee D. The Effectiveness of Coerced Treatment for Drug-Abusing Offenders. Paper Presented at the Office of National Drug Control Policy's Conference of Scholars and Policy Makers. Washington, DC: 1998. Available from: (accessed 17 November 2010).
7. Hiller M. L., Knight K., Simpson D. D. Prison-based substance abuse treatment, residential aftercare and recidivism. Addiction 1999; 94: 833-42.
8. Brecht M. L., Anglin M. D., Wang J. C. Treatment effectiveness for legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance clients. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1993; 19: 89-106.
9. Hepburn J. R. Recidivism among drug offenders following exposure to treatment. Crim Justice Policy Rev 2005; 16: 237.
10. Boyle K., Polinsky M. L., Hser Y.-I. Resistance to drug abuse treatment: a comparison of drug users who accept or decline treatment referral assessment. J Drug Issues 2000; 30: 555-74.
11. Hepburn J. R., Albonetti C. A. Recidivism among drug offenders: a survival analysis of the effects of offender characteristics, type of offense, and two types of intervention. J Quant Criminol 1994; 10: 159-79.
12. Visher C. A., Linster R. L. A survival model of pretrial failure. J Quant Criminol 1990; 6: 153-84.
13. Belenko S. Research on drug courts: a critical review. Natl Drug Court Inst Rev 1998; 1: 143-71.
14. Goldkamp J. S., Weiland D. Assessing the Impact of Dade County's Felony Drug Court. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice; 1993.
15. Finn P., Newlyn A. K. Miami's 'Drug Court': A Different Approach. Washington DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice; 1993.
16. Gottfredson D. C., Najaka S. S., Kearley B. W. Long-term effects of participation in the Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court: results from an experimental study. J Exp Criminol 2006; 2: 67-98.
17. Banks D., Gottfredson D. C. The effects of drug treatment and supervision on time to rearrest among drug treatment court participants. J Drug Issues 2003; 33: 385-412.
18. Belenko S. Research on Drug Courts: A Critical Review, 2001 Update. New York, NY: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse; 2001.
19. Nurco D. N., Hanlon T. E., Kinlock T. W. Recent research on the relationship between illicit drug use and crime. Behav Sci Law 1991; 9: 221-42.
20. Marlowe D. B., Festinger D. S., Foltz C., Lee P. A., Patapis N. S. Perceived deterrence and outcomes in drug court. Behav Sci Law 2005; 23: 183-98.
21. Satel S. Observational study of courtroom dynamics in selected drug courts. Natl Drug Court Inst Rev 1998; 1: 43-72.
22. Marchand G., Waller M., Carey S. M. Barry County Adult Drug Court Outcome and Cost Evaluation. Portland, OR: NPC Research; 2006.
23. Gottfredson D. C., Kearley B. W., Najaka S. S., Rocha C. M. How drug treatment courts work: an analysis of mediators. J Res Crime Delinq 2007; 44: 3-35.
24. Marlowe D. B., Festinger D. S., Dugosh K. L., Lee P. A. Are judicial status hearings a 'key component' of drug court? Six and twelve months outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend 2005; 79: 145-55.
25. Marlowe D. B., Festinger D. S., Dugosh K. L., Lee P. A., Benasutti K. M. Adapting judicial supervision to the risk level of drug offenders: discharge and 6-month outcomes from a prospective matching study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 88: S4-S13.
26. Claster D. S. Comparison of risk perception between delinquents and non-delinquents. J Crim Law Criminol 1967; 58: 80.
27. Paternoster R., Saltzman L. E., Waldo G. P., Chiricos T. G. Perceived risk and social control: do sanctions really deter. Law Soc Rev 1982; 17: 457.
28. Toby J. Social disorganization and stake in conformity: complementary factors in the predatory behavior of hoodlums. J Crim Law Criminol 1957; 48: 12.
29. Adams W. L., Cox N. S. Epidemiology of problem drinking among elderly people. Int J Addict 1995; 30: 1693-716.
30. McLellan A. T., Kushner H., Metzger D., Peters R., Smith I., Grissom G. etal. The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J Subst Abuse Treat 1992; 9: 199-213.
31. Banks D., Gottfredson D. C. Participation in drug treatment court and time to rearrest. Justice Q 2004; 21: 637-58.
32. Gottfredson D., Najaka S. S., Kearley B. Effectiveness of drug courts: evidence from a randomized trial. Criminol Public Policy 2003; 2: 171-94.
33. Gottfredson D. C., Exum M. L. The Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court: one-year results from a randomized study. J Res Crime Delinq 2002; 39: 337-56.
34. Brewster M. P. An evaluation of the Chester County (PA) drug court program. J Drug Issues 2001; 31: 177-206.
35. Carey S., Marchand G. Marion County Adult Drug Court Outcome Evaluation. Portland, OR: NPC Research; 2005.
36. Carey S., Marchand G. Malheur Country Adult Drug Court (S.A.F.E. Court) Outcome Evaluation. Portland, OR: NPC Research; 2005.
37. Cresswell L. S., Deschenes E. P. Minority and non-minority perceptions of drug court program severity and effectiveness. J Drug Issues 2001; 31: 259-92.
38. Deschenes E. P., Turner S., Greenwood P. W. Drug court or probation?: an experimental evaluation of maricopa county's drug court. Justice Syst J 1995; 18: 55-73.
39. Festinger D. S., Marlowe D. B., Lee P. A., Kirby K. C., Bovasso G., McLellan A. T. Status hearings in drug court: when more is less and less is more. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002; 68: 151-7.
40. Marchand G., Waller M., Carey S. M. Kalamazoo County Adult Drug Treatment Court: Outcome and Cost Evaluation. Portland, OR: NPC Research; 2006.
41. Marlowe D. B., Festinger D. S., Lee P. A., Schepise M. M., Hazzard J. E. R., Merrill J. C. etal. Are judicial status hearings a key component of drug court? During-treatment data from a randomized trial. Crim Justice Behav 2003; 30: 141-62.
42. Sechrest D. K., Schicor D. Determinants of graduation from a day treatment drug court in California: a preliminary study. J Drug Issues 2001; 31: 129-47.
43. Sung H.-E., Belenko S. Failure after success: correlates of recidivism among individuals who successfully completed coerced drug treatment. J Offend Rehab 2005; 42: 75-97.
44. Sung H.-E., Belenko S., Feng L., Tabachnick C. Predicting treatment noncompliance among criminal justice-mandated clients: a theoretical and empirical exploration. J Subst Abuse Treat 2004; 26: 13-26.
45. Schiff M., Terry C. Predicting graduation from Broward County's dedicated drug treatment court. Justice Syst J 1997; 19: 291-310.
46. Roman J., Townsend W., Bhati A. S. Recidivism Rates for Drug Court Graduates: Nationally Based Estimates. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 2002.
47. Fetros C. The Los Angeles County Drug Courts: Correlates of Success. Long Beach, CA: California State University; 1998.
48. Harrell A., Smith B. Evaluation of the District of Columbia Superior Court Drug Intervention Program: Focus Group Interviews. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 1996.
49. Dannerbeck A., Harris G., Sundet P., Lloyd K. Understanding and responding to racial differences in drug court outcomes. J Ethn Subst Abuse 2006; 5: 1-22.
50. Goodman E., Huang B. Socioeconomic status, depressive symptoms, and adolescent substance use. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002; 156: 448-53.
51. Terrell F., Terrell S. Race of counselor, client sex, cultural mistrust level, and premature termination from counseling among Black clients. J Couns Psychol 1984; 31: 371-5.
52. Walton M. A., Blow F. C., Bingham C. R., Chermack S. T. Individual and social/environmental predictors of alcohol and drug use 2 years following substance abuse treatment. Addict Behav 2003; 28: 627-42.
53. Vito G. F., Tewksbury R. A. The impact of treatment: the Jefferson County (Kentucky) drug court program. Fed Probat 1998; 62: 46-51.
54. Andenaes J. Does punishment deter crime? Crim Law Q 1968; 11: 76-93.
55. Matza D. Delinquency and Drift. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1964.
56. Tittle C. R., Logan C. H. Sanctions and deviance: evidence and remaining questions. Law Soc Rev 1972; 7: 371.
57. DeJong C. Survival analysis and specific deterence: integrating theoretical and empirical models of recidivism. Criminology 1997; 35: 561-76.