Recidivism Among Drug Offenders Following Exposure to Treatment

Criminal Justice Policy Review

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 237-259

  Hepburn, John R ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

drug offenders; recidivism; treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992806437     PISSN: 08874034     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0887403404270604     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Anglin, D. (1988). The efficacy of civil commitment in treating narcotic addiction. In C. Leukefeld & F. Tims (Eds.), NIDA research monograph 86 (pp. 8-34). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
2. Anglin, D., & Hser, Y. -I. (1990a). Legal coercion and drug abuse treatment: Research findings and social policy implications. In J. Inciardi (Ed.), Handbook of drug control in the United States (pp. 151-176). New York: Greenwood.
3. Anglin, D., & Hser, Y. -I. (1990b). Treatment of drug abuse. In M. Tonry & J. Wilson (Eds.), Crime and justice 13, drugs and crime (pp. 393-460). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Anglin, D., Longshore, D., & Turner, S. (1999). Treatment alternatives to street crime. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 168-195.
5. Anglin, D., Prendergast, M., & Farabee, D. (1998). The effect of coerced drug treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Paper presented at the Office of National Drug Control Policy's Conference of Scholars and Policy Makers, Washington, DC.
6. Anglin, M., Brecht, M., & Maddahian, E. (1989). Pretreatment characteristics and treatment performance of legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance admissions. Criminology, 27, 537-557.
7. Banks, D., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2003). The effects of drug treatment and supervision ontime to rearrest among drug treatment court participants. Journal of Drug Issues, 3, 385-412.
8. Belenko, S. (1990). The impact of drug offenders on the criminal justice system. In R. Weisheit (Ed.), Drugs, crime and the criminal justice system (pp. 18-39).
9. Belenko, S., Fagan, J., & Dumanovsky, T. (1994). Effects of legal sanctions on recidivism in special drug courts. Justice System Journal, 17, 53-81.
10. Benedict, W. R., Huff-Corzine, L., & Corzine, J. (1998). Clean up and go straight: Effects of drug treatment on recidivism among felony probationers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 169-187.
11. Boyle, K., Polinsky, M., & Hser, Y. -I. (2000). Resistance to drug abuse treatment: A comparison of drug users who accept or decline treatment referral assessment. Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 555-574.
12. Boyum, D. A., & Kleiman, M. A. R. (2002). Substance-abuse policy from a crime-control perspective. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime: Public policies for crime control (pp. 331-382). Oakland, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
13. Brecht, M. L., Anglin, M. D., & Wang, J. C. (1993). Treatment effectiveness for legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance clients. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 19, 89-106.
14. Carroll, K. M., & Rousaville, B. J. (1992). Contrast of treatment-seeking and untreated cocaine abusers. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 464-471.
15. Caulkins, J., Rydell, W., Schwabe, W., & Chiesa, J. (1997). Mandatory minimum drug sentences: Throwing away the key or the taxpayers' money? Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
16. Chung, C., Schmidt, P., & Witte, A. (1991). Survival analysis: A survey. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7, 59-98.
17. Czuchry, M., & Dansereau, D. (2000). Drug abuse treatment in criminal justice settings: Enhancing community engagement and helpfulness. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 26, 537-552.
18. DeLeon, G. (1988). Legal pressure in therapeutic communities. In C. Leukefeld & F. Tims (Eds.), Compulsory treatment of drug abuse: Research and clinical practice (NIDA research monograph 86, pp. 83-98). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
19. DeLeon, G., & Jainchill, N. (1986). Circumstances, motivation, readiness and suitability. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 18, 203-208.
20. Elandt-Johnson, R. C., & Johnson, N. L. (1980). Survival models and data analysis. New York: John Wiley.
21. Farabee, D., Nelson, R., & Spence, R. (1994). Psychosocial profiles of criminal-justice- and non-criminal-justice-referred substance abusers in treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 336-346.
22. Farabee, D., Prendergast, M., & Anglin, M. D. (1998). The effectiveness of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Federal Probation, 62, 3-10.
23. French, M., Salome', H., Krupski, A., McKay, J., Donovan, D., McLellan, A. T., et al. (2000). Benefit-cost analysis of residential and outpatient addiction treatment in the state of Washington. Evaluation Review, 24, 609-634.
24. Gaes, G., Flanagan, T., Motiuk, L., & Stewart, L. (1999). Adult correctional treatment. In M. Tonry & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Prisons (pp. 361-426). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Gerstein, D., & Harwood, H. (Eds.). (1990). Treating drug problems: A study of evolution, effectiveness and financing for public and private drug treatment systems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. Gerstein, D., Johnson, R., Harwood, H., Fountain, D., Suter, N., & Malloy, K. (1994). Evaluating recovery services: The California drugs and alcohol treatment assessment. Sacramento: State of California, Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs.
27. Harwood, H., Collins, J., Hubbard, R., Marsden, M., & Rachal, J. (1988). The costs of crime and benefits of drug abuse treatment: A cost benefit analysis using TOPS data. In C. Leukefeld & F. Tims (Eds.), Compulsory treatment of drug abuse: Research and clinical practice (NIDA research monograph 86, pp. 209-235). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
28. Hepburn, J., & Albonetti, C. (1994). Recidivism among drug offenders: A survival analysis of the effects of offender characteristics, type of offense, and two types of intervention. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 159-179.
29. Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., Broome, K., & Simpson, D. (1998). Legal pressure and treatment retention in a national sample of long-term residential programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 463-481.
30. Hser, Y. -I., Longshore, D., &. Anglin, M. D. (1994). Prevalence of drug use among criminal offender populations: Implications for control, treatment and policy. In D. MacKenzie & C. Uchida (Eds.), Drugs and crime: Evaluating public policy initiatives (pp. 18-41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Hser, Y. -I., Maglione, M., Polinsky, M., & Anglin, M. D. (1998). Predicting treatment entry among treatment-seeking drug abusers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15, 213-220.
32. Hubbard, R., Craddock, S., Flynn, P., Anderson, J., & Etheridge, R. (1997). Overview of 1-year follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11, 261-278.
33. Hubbard, R., Marsden, M., Rachal, J., Harwood, H., Cavanaugh, E., & Ginzburg, H. (1989). Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
34. Inciardi, J., & Martin, S. (1993). Drug abuse treatment in criminal justice settings. Journal of Drug Issues, 23, 1-6.
35. Institute of Medicine. (1996). Pathways of addiction: Opportunities in drug abuse research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (1980). The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: John Wiley.
37. Knight, K., Hiller, M., Broome, K., & Simpson, D. (2000). Legal pressure, treatment readiness, and engagement in long-term residential programs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 31, 101-115.
38. Kouri, E., Pope, H., Jr., Powell, K., Oliva, P., & Campbell, C. (1997). Drug use history and criminal behavior among 133 incarcerated men. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 23, 413-419.
39. Lee, E. (1980). Statistical methods for survival data analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
40. Leshner, A. I. (1997). Introduction to the special issue: The National Institute of Drug Abuse's (NIDA) Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11, 211-215.
41. Lipton, D. (1995). The effectiveness of treatment for drug abusers under criminal justice supervision. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
42. Lurigio, A. (2000). Drug treatment availability and effectiveness: Studies of the general and criminal justice populations. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 2, 495-528.
43. Maltz, M. (1984). Recidivism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
44. Maxwell, S. (2000). Sanction threats in court-ordered programs: Examining their effects on offenders mandated into drug treatment. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 542-564.
45. Menard, S., Mihalic, S., & Huizinga, D. (2001). Drugs and crime revisited. Justice Quarterly, 18, 269-299.
46. Miller, N., & Flaherty, J. (2000). Effectiveness of coerced addiction treatment (alternative consequences). Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18, 9-16.
47. Norland, S., Sowell, R., & DiChiara, A. (2003). Assumptions of coercive treatment: A critical review. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14, 505-521.
48. Prendergast, M., Anglin, D., & Wellisch, J. (1995). Treatment for drug-abusing offenders under community supervision. Federal Probation, 59, 66-75.
49. Prendergast, M., Podus, D., & McCormack, K. (1998). Bibliography of literature reviews of drug abuse treatment effectiveness. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15, 267-270.
50. Satel, S. L. (1999). Drug treatment: The case for coercion. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.
51. Schmidt, L., & Weisner, C. (1993). Developments in alcoholism treatment. In M. Galanter (Ed.), Recent developments in alcoholism, volume 11: Ten years of progress (pp. 37-54). New York: Plenum.
52. Shearer, R., Myers, L., & Ogan, G. (2001). Treatment resistance and ethnicity among female offenders in substance abuse treatment programs. The Prison Journal, 81, 55-72.
53. Sia, T., Dansereau, D., & Czuchry, M. (2000). Treatment readiness training and probationers' evaluation of substance abuse treatment in a criminal justice setting. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 19, 459-467.
54. Simpson, D. (1993). Drug treatment evaluation in the United States. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 7, 120-128.
55. Simpson, D., & Friend, H. (1988). Legal status and long-term outcomes for addicts in the DARP followup project (NIDA research monograph series 86). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
56. Simpson, D., Joe, G., & Brown, B. (1997). Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11, 294-307.
57. Simpson, D., & Sells, S. (1982). Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: An overview of the DARP research program. Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse, 2, 7-29.
58. Skolnick, J. (1997). Rethinking the drug problem. In L. Gaines & P. Kraska (Eds.), Drugs, crime and justice (pp. 226-249). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
59. Smith, L., & Akers, R. (1993). A comparison of recidivism of Florida's community control and prison: A five-year survival analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 267-292.
60. Speckart, G., Anglin, D., & Deschenes, E. (1989). Modeling the longitudinal impact of legal sanctions on narcotics use and property crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5, 33-56.
61. Tabbush, V. (1986). The effectiveness and efficiency of publicly funded drug abuse treatment and prevention programs in California: A benefit-cost analysis. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.
62. U.S. Department of Justice. (2003). Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program: Annual report. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
63. Visher, C., & Linster, R. (1990). A survival model of pretrial failure. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 6, 153-184.
64. White, H. R., & Gorman, D. (2000). Dynamics of the drug-crime relationship. In G. LaFree (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000, volume 1: The nature of crime: Continuity and change (pp. 151-218). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.