The effects of drug treatment and supervision on time to rearrest among drug treatment court participants

Journal of Drug Issues

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 385-412

  Banks, Duren ^a   Gottfredson, Denise C ^b  

^a ICF INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COURT; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; REVIEW; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 0038310125     PISSN: 00220426     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002204260303300206     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Andrews, D.A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. 1990 Does correctional treatment work? A clinically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369-404.
2. Anglin, M. D., & Hser, Y. 1990 Treatment of drug abuse. In M. Tonry & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of the research, Vol. 13 (pp. 393-460). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Anglin, M.D., Brecht, M., & Maddahian, E. 1989 Pretreatment characteristics and treatment performance of legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance admissions. Criminology, 27(3), 537-557.
4. Anspach, D. F., & Ferguson, A. S. 1999) Cumberland County's drug court program: An evaluation report of Project Exodus. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Drug Courts Program Office.
5. Banks, D., & Gottfredson, D.C. 2002 The Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court: Effect of the drug court policy on time to rearrest. College Park, MD: The University of Maryland.
6. Banks, J., Porter, A. L., Rardin, R.L., Silver, T.R., & Unger, V.E. 1977 Summary, phase I evaluation of intensive special probation projects. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.
7. Belenko, S. 1998 Behind bars: Substance abuse and America's prison population. New York: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
8. Brecht, M. L., & Anglin, M.D. 1993 Treatment effectiveness for legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance clients. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 19(1), 89-106.
9. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1993 Drugs and crime facts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
10. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1999 Felony sentences in state courts, 1996. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
11. Carter, R.M., Robinson, J., & Wilkins, L.T. 1967 The San Francisco project: A study of federal probation and parole. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Collins, J.J., & Allison, M. 1983 Legal coercion and retention in drug abuse treatment. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 34(12), 1145-1149.
13. Deschenes, E. P., Turner, S., & Greenwood, P. W. 1995 Drug court or probation? An experimental evaluation of Maricopa County's drug court. The Justice System Journal, 18(1), 55-73.
14. Finigan, M. 1998 An outcome program evaluation of the Multnomah County S.T.O.P. drug diversion program. West Linn, OR: State Justice Institute.
15. Garrett, C. J. 1985 Effects of residential treatment on adjudicated delinquents - A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(4), 287-308.
16. Gendreau, P., & Ross, R.R. 1987 Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4(3), 349-407.
17. General Accounting Office 1998 Drug abuse: Studies show treatment is effective, but benefits may be overstated. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
18. Goldkamp, J. S., & Weiland, D. 1993 Assessing the impact of Dade County's felony drug court. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
19. Gottfredson, D. C., Coblentz, K., & Harmon, M. A. 1997 A short-term outcome evaluation of the Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court program. American Probation and Parole Association Perspectives, (Winter), 33-38.
20. Gottfredson, D. C., Najaka, S. S., & Kearley, B. 2003 Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 401-426. College Park, MD: The University of Maryland.
21. 2002 The Baltimore City Drug Court: One-year results from a randomized study. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 337-356.
22. Granfield, R., Eby, C., & Brewster, T. 1998 An examination of the Denver Drug Court: The impact of a treatment-oriented drug offender system. Law and Policy, 20(2), 183-202.
23. Harrell, A. V., Cavanagh, S., & Roman, J. 1998 Final report: Findings from the evaluation of the D.C. Superior Court Drug Intervention Program. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
24. Hart, T. C., & Reaves, B. A. 1999 Felony defendants in large urban counties, 1996. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
25. Hser, Y., Grella, C., Chou, C.-P., & Anglin, M.D. 1998 Relationships between drug treatment careers and outcomes: Findings from the national drug abuse treatment outcome study. Evaluation Review, 22, 496-519.
26. Hubbard, R. L., Craddock, S. G., Flynn, P. M., Anderson, J., & Etheridge, R. M. 1997 Overview of 1-year follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11(4), 261-278.
27. Lipsey, M. W. 1992 Juvenile correctional treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T.D. Cook, H. Cooper, D.S. Corday, H. Hartman, L.V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T.A. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83-127). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
28. Lipton, D. S. 1996 Prison-based therapeutic communities: Their success with drug-abusing offenders. NIJ Journal, 230, 12-20.
29. Logan, C.H., & Gaes, G.G. 1993 Meta-analysis and the rehabilitation of punishment. Justice Quarterly, 10(2), 245-263.
30. MacKenzie, D. L. 1997 Criminal justice and crime prevention. In L.W. Sherman, D. Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter, & S. Bushway (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising (pp. 9-1 - 9-76). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
31. Martinson, R. 1974 What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 35, 22-54.
32. McLellan, A.T., & Druley, K.A. 1977 A comparative study of response to treatment in court-referred and voluntary drug patients. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 28(4), 241-242.
33. Mieczkowski, T., Anglin, M. D., Coletti, S., Johnson, B. D., Nadelman, E.A., & Wish, E.D. 1992 Responding to America's drug problems: Strategies for the 1990s. Journal of Urban Affairs, 14 (3/4), 337-357.
34. Peters, R. H., & Murrin, M. R. 1998 Evaluation of treatment-based drug courts in Florida's First Judicial Circuit. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida Department of Mental Health Law and Policy.
35. Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. 1991 Evaluation of intensive probation in California. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82(3), 610-658.
36. Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. 1993 Intensive probation and parole. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of the research, Vol. 17 (pp.281-335). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Petersilia, J., Turner, S., & Deschenes, E. P. 1992 Evaluating intensive supervision probation/parole (ISP) for drug offenders. Crime and Delinquency, 38(4), 539-556.
38. Reuter, P., & Kleiman, M. A. R. 1986 Risks and prices - An economic analysis of drug enforcement. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research, Vol. 7 (pp. 289-340). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Roberts-Gray, C. 1994 Process evaluation: SHORT program, 1993-1994. Austin, TX: Resource Network.
40. Rosenberg, C.M., & Liftik, J. 1976 Use of coercion in the outpatient treatment of alcoholism. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 37(1), 58-65.
41. Salmon, R.W., & Salmon, R.J. 1983 The role of coercion in rehabilitation of drug abusers. The International Journal of the Addictions, 18(1), 9-21.
42. Schnoll, S.H., Goldstein, M.R., Antes, D.E., & Rinella, V.J. 1980 The impact of legal involvement on substance abusers in a residential treatment setting. Corrective and Social Psychology, 26(1), 21-28.
43. Sechrest, D.K., Shichor, D., Artist, K., & Briceno, G. 1998 The Riverside County drug court: Final research report for the Riverside County Probation Department, Riverside County, California. San Bernadino, CA: California State University, Criminal Justice Department.
44. Simpson, D. D., & Friend, H.J. 1988 Legal status and long-term outcomes for addicts in the DARP followup project. In C.G. Leukefeld, & F.M. Tims (Eds.), Compulsory treatment of drug abuse: Research and clinical practice (NIDA Research Monograph 86, DHHS Publication No. ADM 89-1578, pp. 81-98). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
45. Simpson, D. D., Joe, G.W., & Brown, B.S. 1997 Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11(4), 294-307.
46. Taxman, F. S. 1999 Unraveling 'what works' for offenders in substance abuse treatment services. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2(2), 93-134.
47. Truitt, L., Rhodes, W.M., Seeherman, A.M., Carrigan, K., & Finn, P. 2000 Phase I: Case studies and impact evaluations of Escambia County (Pensacola), Florida and Jackson County (Kansas City), Missouri drug courts. Executive summary. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, Inc.
48. Whitehead, J. T., & Lab, S. P. 1989 Meta-analysis of juvenile correctional treatment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26 (3), 276-295.
49. Wish, E. D., & Johnson, B. D. 1986 The impact of substance abuse on criminal careers. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J.A. Roth, & C.A. Visher (Eds.), Criminal careers and "career criminals," Vol. 2 (pp. 52-88). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.