Finite element sub-modeling analyses of damage to enamel at the incisor enamel/adhesive interface upon de-bonding for different orthodontic bracket bases

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 134-142

  Lin, Chun Li ^a   Huang, Shao Fu ^a   Tsai, Hui Chin ^b   Chang, Wen Jen ^c  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Bracket; Finite element analysis; Interface; Orthodontic; Sub modeling

Indexed keywords

BRACKET; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; INTERFACE; ORTHODONTIC; SUB-MODELING;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ENAMELS; RESINS; STRESS CONCENTRATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

RESIN;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTURE; ENAMEL; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IN VITRO STUDY; INCISOR; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MECHANICAL TORSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MODELS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; TORSION, MECHANICAL; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 78649996202     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.038     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barink M., Van Mark P.C., Fennis W.M., Kuijs R.H., Kreulen C.M., Verdonschot N. A three-dimensional finite element model of the polymerization process in dental restorations. Biomaterials 2003, 24(8):1427-1435.
2. Brosh T., Kaufman A., Balabanovsky A., Vardimon A.D. In vivo debonding strength and enamel damage in two orthodontic debonding methods. Journal of Biomechanics 2005, 38(5):1107-1113.
3. Buonocore M.G., Matsui A., Gwinnett A.J. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Archives of Oral Biology 1968, 13(1):61-70.
4. Chen C.S., Hsu M.L., Chang K.D., Kuang S.H., Chen P.T., Gung Y.W. Failure analysis: enamel fracture after debonding orthodontic brackets. The Angle Orthodontist 2008, 78(6):1071-1077.
5. Cormier N.G., Smallwood B.S., Sinclair G.B., Meda G. Aggressive submodelling of stress concentrations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1999, 46(6):889-909.
6. Faust J.B., Grego G.N., Fan P.L., Powers J.M. Penetration coefficient, tensile strength, and bond strength of thirteen direct bonding orthodontic cements. American Journal of Orthodontics 1978, 73(5):512-525.
7. Gupta S., Helm F.C., Keulen F. Stress analysis of cemented glenoid prostheses in total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Biomechanics 2004, 37(11):1777-1786.
8. Gupta S., Helm F.C., Keulen F. The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component-a finite element study. Clinical Biomechanics 2004, 19(3):292-302.
9. Hipólito V.D., Goes M.F., Carrilho M.R.O., Chan D.C.N., Daronch M., Sinhoreti M.A.C. SEM evaluation of contemporary self-etching primers applied to ground and unground enamel. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2005, 7(3):203-211.
10. Kapur R., Sinha P.K., Nanda R.S. Comparison of load transmission and bracket deformation between titanium and stainless steel brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1999, 116(3):275-278.
11. Knoll M., Gwinnett A.J., Wolff M.S. Shear strength of brackets bonded to anterior and posterior teeth. American Journal of Orthodontics 1986, 89(6):476-479.
12. Knox J., Jones M.L., Hubsch P., Middleton J., Kralj B. An evaluation of the stresses generated in a bonded orthodontic attachment by three different load cases using the finite element method of stress analysis. Journal of Orthodontics 2000, 27(1):39-46.
13. Liu H.L., Lin C.L., Sun M.T., Chang Y.H. Numerical investigation of macro and micro-mechanics of a ceramic veneer bonded with various cement thicknesses using the typical and submodeling finite element approaches. Journal of Dentistry 2009, 37(2):141-148.
14. Meng C.L., Li C.H., Wang W.N. Bond strength with APF applied after acid etching. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1998, 114(5):510-513.
15. Pickett K.L., Sadowsky P.L., Jacobson A., Lacefield W. Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: comparison with in vitro results. The Angle Orthodontist 2001, 71(2):141-148.
16. Rix D., Foley T.F., Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glassfilled GIC. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2001, 119(1):36-42.
17. Rossouw P.E., Terblanche E. Use of the finite element analysis in assessing stress distribution during de-bonding. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 1995, 29(11):713-717.
18. Sharma-Sayal S.K., Rossouw P.E., Kulkarni G.V., Titley K.C. The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2003, 124(1):74-82.
19. Shinya M., Shinya A., Lassila L.V., Gomi H., Varrela J., Vallittu P.K., Shinya A. Treated enamel surface patterns associated with five orthodontic adhesive systems-surface morphology and shear bond strength. Dental Materials Journal 2008, 27(1):1-6.
20. Simmons C.A., Meguid S.A., Pilliar.R.M. Mechanical regulation of localized and appositional bone formation around bone-interfacing implants. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 2001, 55(1):63-71.
21. Soares C.J., Soares P.V., Santos-Filho P.C.F., Armstrong S.R. Microtensile specimen attachment and shape-finite element analysis. Journal of Dental Research 2008, 87:89-93.
22. Sorel O., Alam R., Chagneau F., Cathelineau G. Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement. L' Orthodontie Francaise 2000, 71(2):155-163.
23. Sorel O., Alam R., Chagneau F., Cathelineau G. Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laserstructured base retention brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2002, 122(3):260-266.
24. Valletta R., Prisco D., De Santis R., Ambrosio L., Martina R. Evaluation of the debonding strength of orthodontic brackets using three different bonding systems. European Journal of Orthodontics 2007, 29(6):571-577.
25. Versluis A., Tantbirojn D., Douglas W.H. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin?. Journal of Dental Research 1997, 76(6):1298-1307.
26. Wang W.N., Meng C.L., Tarng T.H. Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1997, 111(4):374-381.
27. Zarone F., Apicella D., Sorrentino R., Ferro V., Aversa R., Apicella A. Influence of tooth preparation design on the stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored by means of alumina porcelain veneers: a 3D-finite element analysis. Dental Materials 2005, 21(12):1178-1188.