In vivo debonding strength and enamel damage in two orthodontic debonding methods

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1107-1113

  Brosh, Tamar ^a   Kaufman, Assaf ^a   Balabanovsky, Alex ^a   Vardimon, Alexander D ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

ARI; Brackets; Debonding force; Debonding strength; Enamel damage

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVES; BIOMATERIALS; CALCIUM; DEBONDING; ENAMELS; ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY; FAILURE ANALYSIS; PATIENT MONITORING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS;

ADHESIVE REMNANT INDEX; DEBONDING STRENGTH; ENAMEL DAMAGE; ORTHODONTIC DEBONDING;

BIOMECHANICS;

CALCIUM;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ENAMEL; FORCE; IN VIVO STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH INJURY;

ADHESIVENESS; ADOLESCENT; CEMENTATION; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, REMOVABLE; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 15944410585     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.025     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Al-Munajed M.K., Gordon P.H., McCabe J.F. The use of a cyanoacrylate adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets. an ex vivo study Journal of Orthodontics. 27:2000;255-260
2. Arici S., Minors C. The force levels required to mechanically debond ceramic brackets. an in vitro comparative study European Journal of Orthodontics. 22:2000;327-334
3. Bishara S.E., Fehr D.E., Jakobsen J.R. A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 104:1993;170-179
4. Bishara S.E., Fonseca J.M., Boyer D.B. The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets. force levels and enamel cracks American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 108:1995;242-248
5. Bishara S.E., Olsen M.E., Damon P., Jakobsen J.R. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 114:1998;80-87
6. Bishara S.E., VonWald L., Laffoon J.F., Warren J.J. Effect of using a new cyanoacrylate adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthodontics. 71:2001;466-469
7. Douglas R., Foley T.F., Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives. composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 119:2001;36-42
8. Eliades T., Brantley W.A. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. European Journal of Orthodontics. 22:2000;13-23
9. Garcia-Godoy F., Hubbard G.W., Storey A.T. Effect of a fluoridated etching gel on enamel morphology and shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 100:1991;163-170
10. Graf I., Jacobi B.E. Bond strength of various fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding systems. Experimental study. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics. 61:2000;191-198
11. Hobson R.S., McCabe J.F. Relationship between enamel etch characteristics and resin-enamel bond strength. British Dental Journal. 27(192):2002;463-468
12. Joseph V.P., Rossouw P.E. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to teeth with orthodontic composite resin and various fissure sealants. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 98:1990;66-71
13. Kapur R., Sinha P.K., Nanda R.S. Comparison of load transmission and bracket deformation between titanium and stainless steel brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 116:1999;275-278
14. Karamouzos A., Mavropoulos A., Athanasiou A.E., Kolokithas G. In vivo evaluation of a moisture-activated orthodontic adhesive. a comparative clinical trial Orthodontics Craniofacial Research. 5:2002;170-178
15. Katona T.R. The effects of load location and misalignment on shear/peel testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets - a finite element model. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 106:1994;395-402
16. Katona T.R. A comparison of the stresses developed in tension, shear peel, and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 112:1997;244-251
17. Katona T.R. Stresses developed during clinical debonding of stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthodontics. 67:1997;39-46
18. Knoll M., Gwinnett A.J., Wolff M.S. Shear bond strengths of brackets bonded to anterior and posterior teeth. American Journal of Orthodontics. 89:1986;476-479
19. Knox J., Jones M.L., Hubsch P., Middleton J., Kralj B. An evaluation of the stresses generated in bonded orthodontic attachment by three different load cases using the finite element method of stress analysis. Journal of Orthodontics. 27:2000;39-46
20. Larmour C.J., Stirrups D.R. An ex vivo assessment of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in relation to bonding technique. Journal of Orthodontics. 28:2001;207-210
21. McCourt J.W., Cooley R.L., Barnwell S. Bond strength of light-cure fluoride-releasing base-liners as orthodontic bracket adhesives. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 100:1991;47-52
22. Osorio R., Toledano M., Garcia-Godoy F. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children. 65:1998;313-317
23. Osorio R., Toledano M., Garcia-Godoy F. Bracket bonding with 15- or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding. Angle Orthodontist. 69:1999;45-48
24. Rix D., Foley T.F., Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives. composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 119:2001;36-42
25. Shammaa I., Ngan P., Kim H., Kao E., Gladwin M., Gunel E., Brown C. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement. an in vitro and in vivo study Angle Orthodontist. 69:1999;463-469
26. Sinha P.K., Nanda R.S., Duncanson M.G., Michael J., Hosier B.S. Bond strengths and remnant adhesive resin on debonding for orthodontic bonding techniques. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 108:1995;302-307
27. Sorel O., El Alam R., Chagneau F., Cathelineau G. Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 122:2002;260-266
28. Wang W.N., Meng C.L., Tarng T.H. Bond strength. a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofaccial Orthopedics. 111:1997;374-381
29. Zarrinnia K., Eid N.M., Kehoe M.J. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface. an in vitro qualitative study American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofaccial Orthopedics. 108:1995;284-293