The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component - A finite element study

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 292-302

  Gupta, S ^a,b,c   Van Der Helm, F C T ^a   Van Keulen, F ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Finite element analysis; Glenoid prostheses; Scapula; Shoulder

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; CEMENTS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); INTERFACES (MATERIALS); STRESS ANALYSIS; STRESS CONCENTRATION; STRESSES;

LOADING CONDITIONS; STRESS PATTERNS;

BIOMECHANICS;

POLYETHYLENE;

ARM PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GLENOID; JOINT FUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SCAPULA; SHOULDER; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; TRABECULAR BONE;

EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SHOULDER JOINT; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 1542375394     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barrett W.P., Franklin J.L., Jackins S.E., Wyss C.R., Matsen F.A. Total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 69-A:1987;865-872.
2. Batte S.W.P., Cordy M.E., Lee T.Y., King G.J.W., Johnson J.A., Chess D.G. Cancellous bone properties of the glenoid: correlation of quantitative CT and mechanical strength. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc. 21:1996;707.
3. Berms J. The glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2:1993;47-54.
4. Cofield R.H. Unconstrained total shoulder prosthesis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 173:1983;97-108.
5. Cofield R.H. Total shoulder arthroplasty with Neer prosthesis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 66-A:1984;899-906.
6. Cofield R.H. Uncemented total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 307:1994;86-93.
7. Dalstra, M., 1993. Biomechanical aspects of the pelvic bone and design criteria for acetabular prosthesis. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
8. Dalstra M., Huiskes R., van Erning L. Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone. J. Biomech. Eng. 117:1995;272-278.
9. Franklin J.L., Barrett W.P., Jackins S.E., Matsen F.A. Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. Association with rotator cuff deficiency. J. Arthroplasty. 3:1988;39-46.
10. Frich, L.H., 1994. Glenoid Knoglestyrke og knoglestruktur. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
11. Friedman J.R., LaBerge M., Dooley R.L., O'Hara A.L. Finite element modelling of the glenoid component: Effect of design parameters on stress distribution. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1:1992;261-270.
12. Fukuda K., Chen C.M., Cofield R.H., Chao E.Y. Biomechanical analysis of stability and fixation strength of total shoulder prostheses. Orthopaedics. 11:1998;141-149.
13. Gibson L.J. The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. J. Biomech. 18:1985;317-328.
14. Gupta, S., Van der Helm, F.C.T., in press. Load transfer across the scapula during humeral abduction. J. Biomech.
15. Gupta, S., Van der Helm, F., Kaptein, B.L., Van Keulen, F., Spoor, C.W., Sterk, J., 1999. Experimental validation of three-dimensional finite element modelling of scapula. In: Proc. XVIIth Conf. Int. Soc. Biomech, Calgary, p. 574.
16. Gupta S., Van der Helm F.C.T., Van Keulen A. Analysis of interface stresses in glenoid prostheses. Proc. 13th Conf. Eur. Soc. of Biomechanics. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 4(Suppl. 1):2002;558-559.
17. Gupta, S., Van der Helm, F.C.T., Van Keulen, F., in press. Stress analysis of cemented glenoid prostheses in total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Biomech.
18. Harrigan T.P., Harris W.H. A three-dimensional non-linear finite element study of the effect cement prosthesis debonding in cemented femoral total hip components. J. Biomech. 24:1991;1047-1058.
19. Hertz H. Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper (On the contact of elastic solids). J. Reine Angew. Math. 92:1882;156-171. (For English translation see Miscellaneous Papers by H. Hertz, Jones and Schoott (Eds.), Macmillan, London).
20. Hoffman O. The brittle strength of orthotropic material. J. Compos. Mater. 1:1967;200-206.
21. Huiskes R. Comparative stress patterns in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthop. Relat. Sci. 1:1990;93-108.
22. Huiskes R., Van Rietbergen B. Preclinical testing of total hip stems. The effects of coating placement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 319:1995;64-76.
23. Kaplan S.J., Hayes W.C., Stone J.L. Tensile strength of bovine trabecular bone. J. Biomech. 18:1985;723-727.
24. Lacroix D., Prendergast P.J. Stress analysis of glenoid component designs for shoulder arthroplasty. J. Eng. Med. Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs. Part H. 211:1997;467-474.
25. McElwain J.P., English E. The early results of porous-coated total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 218:1987;217-224.
26. Müller-Gerbl M., Putz R., Kenn R. Demonstration of subchondral bone density patterns by three-dimensional CT Osteoabsorptiometry as a nonevasive method for in vivo assessment of individual long-term stresses in joints. J. Bone Miner. Res. 7(Suppl. 2):1992;411-418.
27. Norris B.L., Lachiewicz P.F. Modern cement technique and the survivorship of total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 328:1996;76-85.
28. Orr T.E., Carter D.R., Schurman D.J. Stress analyses of glenoid component designs. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 212:1988;217-224.
29. Pierson J.L., Harris W.H. Extensive osteolysis behind an acetabular component that was well fixed with cement - a case report. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 75-A:1993;268-271.
30. Stone J.L., Beaupré G.S., Hayes W.C. Multiaxial strength characteristics of trabecular bone. J. Biomech. 16:1983;743-752.
31. Stone K.D., Grabowski J.J., Cofield R.H., Morrey B.F., An K.N. Stress analysis of glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 8:1999;151-158.
32. Torchia M.E., Cofield R.H., Settergren C.R. Total shoulder arthroplasty with Neer prosthesis: long-term results. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 6:1997;495-505.
33. Van der Helm F.C.T. A finite element musculoskeletal model of the shoulder mechanism. J. Biomech. 27:1994;551-569.
34. Van Rietbergen B., Weinans H., Huiskes R., Odgaard A. A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite element models. J. Biomech. 28:1995;69-81.
35. Wallace A.L., Phillips R.L., MacDougal G.A., Walsh W.R., Sonnabend D.H. Resurfacing of the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty. A comparison, at a mean of five years, of prostheses inserted with and without cement. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 81-A:1999;510-518.
36. Weinans H., Huiskes R., Grootenboer H.J. Trends of mechanical consequences and modelling of a fibrous around femoral hip prostheses. J. Biomech. 23:1991;991-1000.
37. Weinans H., Huiskes R., Grootenboer H.J. Quantitative analysis of bone reactions to relative motions at implant-bone interface. J. Biomech. 26:1993;1271-1282.
38. Weiss A-PC., Adams M.A., Moore J.R., Weiland A.J. Unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty. A five-year follow-up study. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 257:1990;86-90.