Study on contexts in tracking usage and attention metadata in the field of multilingual technology enhanced learning

INFORMATIK 2009 - Im Focus das Leben, Beitrage der 39. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft fur Informatik e.V. (GI)

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1654-1663

  Vuorikari, Riina ^a,b   Berendt, Bettina ^c  

^a European Schoolnet   (Belgium)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACK-GROUND KNOWLEDGE; CONTEXT DATA; CONTEXT INFORMATION; CONTEXT VARIABLES; DATA GATHERING; DIGITAL LEARNING RESOURCES; INTERACTION MODEL; SOCIAL TAGGING; SOCIAL TAGGING SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING; TRANSIENT PROPERTY; USER MODELS; WEB ENVIRONMENT;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES; E-LEARNING; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

METADATA;

EID: 78649919763     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Au Yeung, C.; Gibbins, N.; Shadbolt, N. A study of user profile generation from folksonomies. In Social Web and Knowledge Management, Social Web 2008 Workshop, 2008.
2. Bateman S.; Brooks, C.; McCalla, G. Collaborative tagging approaches for ontological metadata in adaptive e-learning systems. In 4th International Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-Learning (SW-EL 05),pp. 3-12, 2006.
3. Berendt. B. Context, (e)learning, and knowledge discovery for web user modelling: Common research themes and challenges. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Data Mining for User Model ling at UM 2007, 2007.
4. Brockett, R.G; Hiemstra. R. Self-Direction in Adult Learning: Perspectives on Theory, Research, and Practice. Routledge Series on Theory and Practice of Adult Education in North America. Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc., 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001.1991.
5. Berendt, B.; Kralisch, A. A user-centric approach to identifying best deployment strategies for language tools: The impact of content and access language on web user behaviour and attitudes. Journal of Information Retrieval, 12(3):380-399, 2009.
6. Bianco, R.; Lioma. C. Mixed monolingual homepage finding in 34 languages: the role of language script and search domain. Journal of Information Retrieval, 12(3):324-351, 2009.
7. Brooks C; McCalla, G. Towards flexible learning object metadata. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 16(1/2):50-63, 2006.
8. Berendt, B; Spiliopoulou, M. Analysis of navigation behaviour in web sites integrating multiple information systems. The VLDB Journal, 9(1):56-75, 2000.
9. Colley, H.; Hodkinson, P.;Malcom, J. Non-formal learning: mapping the conceptual terrain. a consultation report. 2002.
10. Claypool, M.; Le, P.; Wased, M; Brown, D. Implicit interest indicators. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Intel ligent user interfaces,pp. 33-40. ACM, 2001.
11. Cattuto, C; Schmitz, C; Baldassarri, A; Servedio, V. D. P.; Loreto, V.; Hotho, A., Grahl, M.; Stumme, G. Network properties of folksonomies. AI Commun., 20(4):245-262, 2007.
12. Dey. A. K. Understanding and using context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5(1):4-7, 2001.
13. Engeström, Y. Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit Oy, 1987. http://www.hcirn.com/ref/refe/engy87.php.
14. Graham, C., R. Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C Graham and C Bonk, editors, Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs,pp. 3-21. Pfeiffer Publishing, 2005.
15. Harley, D.; Henke, S.; Nasatir, D. Use and Users of Digital Resources: A Focus on Undergraduate Education in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Digital Resource Study. 2006.
16. Jung, S.; Herlocker, J.L; Webster, J. Click data as implicit relevance feedback in web search. Inf. Process. Manage., 43(3):791-807, 2007.
17. Khoo, M; Pagano, J; Washington, A.L.; Recker, M.; Palmer, B; Donahue, R.A. Using web metrics to analyze digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries,pp. 375-384. ACM, 2008.
18. Longworth, N. Lifelong learning in action-Transforming education in the 21st century. Kogan Page, 2003.
19. Lieberman, H.; Selker, T. Out of context: computer systems that adapt to, and learn from, context. IBM Syst. J., 39(3-4):617-632, 2000.
20. Michlmayr, E; Cayzer, S. Learning user profiles from tagging data and leveraging them for personal(ized) information access. In the Workshop on Tagging and Metadata for Social Information Organization
21. Margaryan, A.; Littlejohn, A. Repositories and communities at cross-purposes: issues in sharing and reuse of digital learning resources. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(4):333-347, 2008.
22. Moore, M. Handbook of distance education. L. Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
23. Noll, M; Meinel, M. Web search personalization via social bookmarking and tagging. In Proc. of ISWC 2007, 2007. http://iswc2007.semanticweb.org/main/ default.asp.
24. Najjar, J; Wolpers, M; Duval, E. Towards effective usage-based learning applications: Track and learn from user experience(s). In Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies,pp. 1022-1024. IEEE Computer Society, 2006.
25. Oberle, D.; Berendt, B.; Hotho, A.; Gonzalez, J. Conceptual user tracking. In E Menasalvas Ruiz, J Segovia, and P Szczepaniak, editors, of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2003., volume 2663 of AWIC, page 155164, 2003.
26. Ochoa, X. Learnometrics: Metrics for Learning Objects. PhD thesis, K.U.Leuven, Belgium, 2008.
27. Petrides, L; Nguyen, L.; Jimes, C.; Karaglani, A. Open educational resources: inquiring into author use and reuse. Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn., 1(1/2):98-117, 2008.
28. Romero, C.; Ventura, S. Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1):135-146, Jul 2007.
29. Schmidt, A; Ubiquitous Computing-Computing in Context. PhD thesis, Computing Department, Lancaster University, U.K., November 2002.
30. Santos-Neto, E.; Condon, D.; Nazareno, A., Ripeanu, M. Individual and social behavior in tagging systems. In 20th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, 2009.
31. Santos-Neto, E.; Ripeanu, M.; Iamnitchi, A. Content reuse and interest sharing in tagging communities. In Technical Notes of the AAAI 2008 Spring Symposia-Social Information Processing, 2008. http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.4142.
32. Vuorikari, R.; Koper, R. Evidence of cross-boundary use and reuse of digital educational resources. submitted, 2009a.
33. Vuorikari, R.; Koper, R. Ecology of social search for learning resources. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 26(4), 2009b. http://dspace.ou.nl/handle/1820/ 1799.
34. Vuorikari, R., & Ochoa, X. (2009). Exploratory Analysis of the Main Characteristics of Tags and Tagging of Educational Resources in a Multi-lingual Context. Journal of Digital Information, 10(2).
35. Vuorikari, R.; Poldoja, H.; Koper, R. Comparison of educational tagging systems any chances of interplay? IJTEL, 2009. http://dspace.ou.nl/handle/1820/ 1798.
36. Vuorikari, R.; Sillaots, M.; Panzavolta, S.; Koper, R. Are tags from mars and descriptors from venus? a study on the ecology of educational resource metadata. In M Spaniol, editor, Advances in Web-Based Learning-ICWL 2009, volume 5686/2009 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 400409. Springer-Verlag, 2009. http://dspace.ou.nl/handle/1820/1849.
37. Wahlster, W; Kobsa, A. User models in dialog systems. In A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster, editors, User Models in Dialog Systems,pp. 4-34. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989.
38. Wolpers, M; Martin, G; Najjar, J; Duval, E. Attention metadata in knowledge and learning management. In Proc. IKNOW 06, 2006.
39. Wolpers, M; Martin, G; Najjar, J; Verbert, K.; Duval, E. Tracking actual usage: the attention metadata approach. Educational Technology and Society Journal, page 106, 2007.