Ecology of social search for learning resources

Campus-Wide Information Systems

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 272-286

  Vuorikari, Riina ^a   Koper, Rob ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Digital libraries; Information retrieval; Learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349316379     PISSN: 10650741     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/10650740910984619     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adomavicius, T. (2005), “Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 17 No. 6.
2. Borlund, P. (2003), “The concept of relevance in IR”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 54 No. 10, pp. 913-25.
3. Campbell, L. (2003), “Engaging with the learning object economy”, in Littlejohn, A. (Ed.), Reusing Online Resources: A Sustainable Approach to E-learning, Kogan Page Limited, London, pp. 35-45.
4. Claypool, M., Le, P., Wased, M. and Brown, D. (2001), “Implicit interest indicators”, ACM Intelligent User Interfaces Conference (IUI 2001), ACM, Santa Fe, NM, pp. 33-40.
5. Dieberger, A., Dourish, P., Höök, K., Resnick, P. and Wexelblat, A. (2000), “Social navigation: techniques for building more usable systems”, Interactions, Vol. 7 No. 6, pp. 36-45.
6. Drachsler, H., Hummel, H., Berg, B., Eshuis, J., Waterink, W. and Koper, R. (2008), “Effects of the ISIS recommender system for navigation support in self-organised learning networks”, Proceedings of Technology Support for Self-Organized Learners (TSSOL 2008), Salzburg, Austria.
7. Farooq, U., Kannampallil, T.G., Song, Y., Ganoe, C.H., Carroll, J.M. and Giles, L. (2007), “Evaluating tagging behavior in social bookmarking systems: metrics and design heuristics”, Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, November 4-7, 2007), pp. 351-60.
8. Farzan, R. and Brusilovsky, P. (2005), “Social navigation support in e-learning: what are the real footprints”, Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalisation (ITWP’05), available at: http://maya.cs.depaul.edu/ ∼ mobasher/itwp05/final/Paper7Farzan.pdf.
9. Glahn, C., Specht, M. and Koper, R. (2008), “Implications of writing, reading, and tagging on web for reflection support in informal learning”, in Specht, M., Dillenbourg, P. and Duval, E. (Eds), Third European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning EC-TEL 2008, Springer, Berlin.
10. Goh, D.H. and Foo, S. (2007), “Preface”, in Go, D.H. and Foo, S. (Eds), Social Information Retrieval Systems: Emerging Technologies and Applications for Searching the Web Effectively, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA.
11. Golder, S. and Huberman, B.A. (2006), “The structure of collaborative tagging systems”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 98-208.
12. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G. and Riedl, J.T. (2004), “Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems”, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 5-53.
13. Jung, S., Herlocker, J.L. and Webster, J. (2007), “Click data as implicit relevance feedback in web search”, Inf. Process. Manage, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 791-807.
14. Koper, R. (2005), “Increasing learner retention in a simulated learning network using indirect social interaction”, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol. 8, p. 18.
15. McGormick, R., Scrimshaw, P., Li, N. and Carmel, C. (2004), “Celebrate Evaluation, Deliverable 7.2”, European Schoolnet, available at: http://celebrate.eun.org/eun.org2/eun/Include_to_content/celebrate/file/Deliverable7_2EvaluationReport02Dec04.pdf.
16. McNee, S. (2006), “Meeting user information needs in recommender systems”, PhD thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
17. Maier, R. and Thalmann, S. (2008), “Institutionalised collaborative tagging as an instrument for managing the maturing learning and knowledge resources”, International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol. 1 Nos 1/2.
18. Manouselis, N., Vuorikari, R. and Van Assche, F. (2007), “Simulated analysis of MAUT collaborative filtering for learning object recommendation”, Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Social Information Retrieval for Technology-Enhanced Learning, Crete, Greece, CEUR, 307, available at: http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-307/Crete.
19. Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D. and Davis, M. (2006), “HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read”, Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Odense, Denmark, pp. 31-40.
20. Millen, D., Yang, M., Whittaker, S. and Feinberg, J. (2007), “Social bookmarking and exploratory search”, in Bannon, L., Wagner, I., Gutwin, C., Harper, R. and Schmidt, K. (Eds), ECSCW'07: Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 24-28 September 2007, Limerick, Ireland.
21. Mukherjee, R. and Mao, J. (2004), “Enterprise search: tough stuff”, Enterprise Search, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 36-46.
22. Najjar, J., Wolpers, M. and Duval, E. (2007), “Contextualized attentin metadata – personalised access to digital resources”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 13 Nos 9/10.
23. Puspitasari, F., Lim, E., Goh, D., Chang, C., Zhang, J., Sun, A., Theng, Y., Chatterjea, K. and Li, Y. (2007), “Social navigation in digital libraries by bookmarking”, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4822, pp. 297-306.
24. Rafaeli, S., Dan-Gur, Y. and Barak, M. (2005), “Social recommender systems: recommendations in support of e-learning”, Journal of Distance Education Technologies, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 29-45.
25. Sen, S., Harper, F.M., LaPitz, A. and Riedl, J. (2007), “The quest for quality tags”, Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 361-70.
26. Tang, T. and McCalla, G. (2009), “The pedagogical value of papers: a collaborative-filtering based paper recommender”, JoDI Special Issue on Social Information Retrieval for Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol. 10 No. 2.
27. Ternier, S., Massart, D., Campi, A., Guinea, S., Ceri, S. and Duval, E. (2008), “Interoperability for searching learning object repositories: the ProLearn query language”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 14 Nos 1/2.
28. Van Assche, F. and Vuorikari, R. (2006), “A framework for quality of learning resources”, in Ehlers, U. and Pawlowski, J.M. (Eds), European Handbook for Quality and Standardization in E-learning, Springer, Berlin.
29. Vuorikari, R. and Koper, R. (n.d.), “Evidence of cross-boundary use and reuse of digital educational resources”, available at: http://dspace.ou.nl/handle/1820/1709.
30. Vuorikari, R. and Ochoa, X. (2009), “Tagging in the context of multiple languages”, JoDI Special Issue on Social Information Retrieval for Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol. 10 No. 2.
31. Vuorikari, R. and Poldoja, H. (2008), “Comparison of educational tagging systems – any chances of interplay?”, proceedings of the 2nd SIRTEL’08 Workshop on Social Information Retrieval for Technology Enhanced Learning, Maastricht, Neterlands, CEUR, available at: http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-382/paper1.pdf.
32. Ward, A.H. and Kalyanam, K. (2007), Internet Marketing and Ecommerce, Thomson College Publishing, Mason, OH.
33. White, R., Marchionini, G. and Muresan, G. (2008), “Evaluating exploratory search systems: introduction to special topic issue of information processing and management”, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 433-6.
34. Cattuto, C., Schmitz, C., Baldassarri, A., Servedio, V.D., Loreto, V., Hotho, A., Grahl, M. and Stumme, G. (2007), “Network properties of folksonomies”, AI Commun, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 245-62.
35. Ryen, W.W., Marchionini, G. and Muresan, G. (2008), “Evaluating exploratory search systems: introduction to special topic issue of information processing and management”, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 433-6.