A Cadaveric Study to Assess the Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Surgery in Locating the Hip Center During Total Knee Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 590-595

  Picard, Frederic ^a   Leitner, Francois ^b   Gregori, Alberto ^c   Martin, Philippe ^d  

^a ECOLE CENTRALE PARIS   (France)

^b Centre de recherche et de développement informatique Aesculap   (France)

^c HAIRMYRES HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

computer assisted surgery; hip center accuracy; total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; HIP; HUMAN; ILIAC BONE; RANGE OF MOTION; RELIABILITY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ALGORITHMS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CADAVER; FLUOROSCOPY; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 34250011755     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.027     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ayers D.C., Dennis D.A., Johnson N.A., et al. Common complications of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 79A (1997) 278
2. Ranawat C.S. Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 226 (1998) 6
3. Coyte P.C., Hawker G., Croxford R., et al. Rates of revision knee replacement in Ontario, Canada. J Bone Joint Surg 81A (1999) 773
4. Bankes M.J., Back D.L., Cannon S.R., et al. The effect of component malalignment on the clinical and the radiological outcome of the Kinemax total knee replacement. Knee 10 (2003) 55
5. Saragaglia D., Picard F., Chaussard C., et al. Mise en place des prothèses totales du genou assistée par ordinateur. Comparaison avec la technique conventionnelle. A propos d'une étude prospective randomisée de 50 cas. Rev Chir Orthop 87 (2001) 18
6. Jenny J.Y., and Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis Implantation with a non-image-based navigation system. In: DiGioia A., Jaramaz B., Picard F., and Nolte L.P. (Eds). Computer and robotic assisted knee and hip surgery (2004), Oxford University Press Inc., New York 179
7. Miehlke R.K., Haaker R.G., and Konermann W.H. The Orthopilot navigation system in total knee arthroplasty: version 4.0. In: Stiehl J.B., Haaker R.G., and Konermann W.H. (Eds). Navigation and robotics in total joint and spine surgery (2004), Springer Verlag, Berlin 242
8. Picard F., Digioia A., and Saragaglia D. La navigation informatique dans les prothèses du genou. In La gonarthrose. In: Bonnin M., and Chambat P. (Eds) (2003), Springer-Verlag, Paris, France 586
9. Delp D.L., Stulberg S.D., Davies B., et al. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop 354 (1998) 49
10. Stulberg S.D., Picard F., and Saragaglia D. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Oper Tech Orthop 10 (2000) 25
11. Krackow K.A., Bayers-Thering M., and Philips M.J. A new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty: progress toward computer-assisted TKA and al. Orthopedics 22 (1999) 698
12. Laskin R.S., and Turtel A. The use of an intramedullary tibial alignment guide in total knee replacement arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 2 (1989) 123
13. Jeffery R.S., Morris R.W., and Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73 (1991) 709
14. Feng E.L., Stulberg S.D., and Wixson R.L. Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in total knee replacements with flat articular surfaces. Clin Orthop 229 (1994) 60
15. Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Keating E.M., et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacements: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 299 (1994) 153
16. Victor J., and Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 131
17. Picard F., Digioia A., Moody J., et al. Accuracy in tunnel placement for ACL reconstruction. Comparison of traditional arthroscopic and computer assisted navigation techniques. Comput Aided Surg 6 (2001) 279
18. Sparmann M., Wolke B., Czupalla H., et al. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 85-b (2003) 830
19. Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breifahl W., et al. Computer-assisted arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86-B (2004) 372
20. Hart R., Janecek M., Chaker A., et al. Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop 27 (2003) 366
21. Decking R., Markmann Y., Fuchs J., et al. Schart Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty; a prospective randomised trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 282
22. Stulberg S.D., Beng P.L., and Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg 84-A Suppl 2 (2002) 90
23. Stöckl B., Nogler M., Rosiek M.A., et al. Navigation Improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 426 (2004) 180
24. Marin F., Mannel F., Claes L., et al. Accurate determination of a joint rotation center based on the minimal amplitude point method. Comput Aided Surg 8 (2003) 30