Interpersonal reality monitoring: Judging the sources of other people's memories

Social Cognition

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 199-224

  Johnson, Marcia K ^a   Bush, Julie G ^b   Mitchell, Karen J ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032356288     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.1998.16.2.199     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bell, B. E., & Jones, J. B. (1994). Providing minor details and the perception of honesty: Questioning the generality of trivial persuasion. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 31 (3/4), 26-29.
2. Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1988). Degree of detail of eyewitness testimony and mock juror judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1171-1192.
3. Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669-679.
4. Bush, J. G., Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994, August). The implications of corrections: Then why did you mention it? Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Atlanta, GA.
5. Ceci, S. J., Crotteau Huffman, M. L., Smith, E., & Loftus, E. F. (1994). Repeatedly thinking about a non-event. Consciousness and Cognition, 3, 388-407.
6. Ceci, S. J., Loftus, E. F., Leichtman, M. D., & Bruck, M. (1994). The possible role of source misattributions in the creation of false beliefs among pre-schoolers. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42, 304-320.
7. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Chaiken, S., Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (1996). Principles of persuasion. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 702-742). New York: Guilford.
9. Conway, M. A., & Dewhurst, S. A. (1995). Remembering, familiarity, and source monitoring. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 125-140.
10. Cowan, C. L., Thompson, W. C., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1984). The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 53-79.
11. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 185-191.
12. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Stuve, T. E. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41-55.
13. Danzer, A. (1990). Judging the origin of other people's memories. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University, New Jersey.
14. Dodson, C.S., & Johnson, M.K. (1993). Rate of false source attributions depends on how questions are asked. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 541-557.
15. Durso, F. T., & Johnson, M. K. (1980). The effects of orienting task on recognition, recall, and modality confusion of pictures and words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 416-429.
16. Ellsworth, P. C. (1993). Some steps between attitudes and verdicts. In R. Hastie (Ed.), Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making (pp. 42-64). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Finke, R. A., Johnson, M. K., & Shyi, G. C.-W. (1988). Memory confusions for real and imagined completions of symmetrical visual patterns. Memory & Cognition, 16, 133-137.
18. Garcia, L. T., & Griffitt, W. (1978). Impact of testimonial evidence as a function of witness characteristics. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 37-40.
19. Gilbert, D.T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107-118.
20. Grice, H. P. (1967/1989). Logic and conversation. In H. P. Grice (1989), Studies in the way of words (pp. 22-40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., & Chrosniak, L. D. (1990). Aging and qualitative characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Psychology and Aging, 5, 119-126.
22. Johnson, M. K. (1983). A multiple-entry, modular memory system. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 17, pp. 81-123). New York: Academic Press.
23. Johnson, M. K. (1988). Discriminating the origin of information. In T. F. Oltmanns, & B. A. Maher (Eds.), Delusional beliefs (pp. 34-65). New York: Wiley.
24. Johnson, M. K. (1991). Reality monitoring: Evidence from confabulation in organic brain disease patients. In G. P. Prigatano & D. L. Schacter (Eds.), Awareness of deficit after brain injury: Clinical and theoretical issues (pp. 176-197). New York: Oxford.
25. Johnson, M. K. (1997). Identifying the origin of mental experience. In M.S. Myslobodsky (Ed.), The mythomanias: The nature of deception and self-deception (pp. 133-180). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371-376.
27. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S. H., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
28. Johnson, M. K., & Multhaup, K. S. (1992). Emotion and MEM. In S.-A. Christianson (Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory: Current research and theory (pp. 33-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
30. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1998). False memories and confabulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 137-145.
31. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (in press). Cognitive and brain mechanisms of false memories and beliefs. In D. L. Schacter & E. Scarry (Eds.), Memory and belief.
32. Johnson, M. K., & Suengas, A. G. (1989). Reality monitoring judgments of other people's memories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 107-110.
33. Keogh, L., & Markham, R. (1998). Judgements of other people's memory reports: Differences in reports as a function of imagery vividness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 159-171.
34. Landry, K. L., & Brigham, J. C. (1992). The effect of training in criteria-based content analysis on the ability of detecting deception in adults. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 663-676.
35. Leippe, M. R., & Manion, A. P., & Romanczyk, A. (1992). Eyewitness persuasion: How and how well do fact finders judge the accuracy of adults' and children's memory reports? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 181-197.
36. Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition, 17, 349-358.
37. Lindsay, D. S., & Read, J. D. (1994). Psychotherapy and memories of childhood sexual abuse: A cognitive perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 281-338.
38. Lindsay, D. S., & Read, J. D. (1995). "Memory work" and recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse: Scientific evidence and public, professional, and personal issues. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 846-908.
39. Lindsay, R. C. L., Lim, R., Marando, L., & Cully, D. (1986). Mock-juror evaluations of eyewitness testimony: A test of metamemory hypotheses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 447-459.
40. Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L (in press). Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
41. Mather, M., Henkel, L. A., & Johnson, M. K. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared. Memory & Cognition, 25, 826-837.
42. Mitchell, K. J., & Johnson, M. K. (in press). Source monitoring: Attributing (and misattributing) memories to sources. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
44. Riggio, R. E., Tucker, J., & Widaman, K. F. (1987). Verbal and nonverbal cues as mediators of deception ability. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 126-145.
45. Ross, M. (1997). Validating memories. In N. L. Stein, P. A. Ornstein, B. Tversky, & C. Brainerd, (Eds.), Memory for everyday and emotional events (pp. 49-81). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Ross, M., & MacDonald, T. K. (1997). How can we be sure? Using truth criteria to validate memories. In M. S. Myslobodsky (Ed.), The mythomanias: The nature of deception and self-deception (pp. 181-201). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Schooler, J. W., Clark, C. A., & Loftus, E. F. (1988). Knowing when memory is real. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues. Volume 1: Memory in everyday life (pp. 83-88). New York: Wiley.
48. Schooler, J. W., Gerhard, D., & Loftus, E. F. (1986). Qualities of the unreal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 171-181.
49. Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Hilton, D. J., & Naderer, G. (1991). Base rates, representativeness, and the logic of conversation: The contextual relevance of "irrelevant" information. Social Cognition, 9, 67-84.
50. Shafir, E. (1993). Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory & Cognition, 21, 546-556.
51. Sporer, S. L. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373-397.
52. Steller, M. (1989). Recent developments in statement analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 135-154). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
53. Stern, L. B., & Dunning, D. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications: A reality monitoring approach. In D. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 273-299). New York: Springer.
54. Suengas, A. G., & Johnson, M. K. (1988). Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 377-389.
55. Thompson, W. C., Cowan, C. L., Ellsworth, P. C., & Harrington, J.C. (1984). Death penalty attitudes and conviction proneness: The translation of attitudes into verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 95-113.
56. Undeutsch, U. (1982). Statement reality analysis. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 27-56). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
57. Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 101-119). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
58. Wells, G. L., & Leippe, M. R. (1981). How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identifications? Using memory for peripheral detail can be misleading. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 682-687.
59. Wells, G. L., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1983). How do people infer the accuracy of eyewitness memory? Studies of performance and a metamemory analysis. In S. M. A. Lloyd-Bostock, & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence: Recent psychological research and new perspectives (pp. 41-55). New York: Wiley.
60. Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 440-448.
61. Wright, E. F., & Wells, G. L. (1988). Is the attitude-attribution paradigm suitable for investigating the dispositional bias? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 183-190.
62. Zaragoza, M. S., Lane, S. M., Ackil, J. K., & Chambers, K. L. (1997). Confusing real and suggested memories: Source monitoring and eyewitness suggestibility. In N. L. Stein, P. A. Ornstein, B. Tversky, & C. Brainerd (Eds.), Memory for everyday and emotional events (pp. 401-425). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.