Contrasts and Interactions Redux: Five Easy Pieces

Psychological Science

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 253-257

  Rosnow, Ralph L ^a   Rosenthal, Robert ^b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84998179966     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00369.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abelson R.P. (1995). Statistics of principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ, Ertbaum.
2. Bakan D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research, Psychological Bulletin, 66, 1–29.
3. Campbell D.T. (1988), Methodology and epistemology for social science Selected papers (Ed. Overman E.S. Ed.), Chicago University of Chicago Press.
4. Campbell D.T., Stanley J.C. (1963), Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research, Chicago Rand McNally.
5. Cohen J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312.
6. Cohen J. (1994). The earth is round (p < 05), American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.
7. Cooper H., Hedges L.V., (Eds.), (1994). The handbook of research synthesis, New York, Russell Sage Foundation.
8. Fisher R.A. (1947). The design of experiments (4th ed.). Edinburgh Oliver and Boyd.
9. Fiske D.W., Shweder R.A., (Eds.), (1986), Mettheory in social science Pluralisms and subjectivities. Chicago University of Chicago Press.
10. Gilovich T. (1991). How we know what isn't so? The fallibility of hujan reason in everyday life, New York Free Press.
11. Haase R.F., Waechter D.M., Solomon G.S. (1982), How significant is a significant difference? Average effect size of research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, 58–65.
12. Houts A.C., Cook T.D., Shadish W., Jr. (1986). The person-situation debate A critical multiplist perspective. Journal of Personality, 54, 52–105.
13. Jacobson N.S., Follette W.C., Revenstorf D. (1984). Psychotherapy outcome research, Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance, Behavior Therapy, 15, 336–552.
14. Johnson M.L. (1953). Seeing's believing, New Biology, 15, 60–80.
15. Judd C.M., McClelland G.H., Culhane S.E. (1995). Data analysis Continuing issues in the everyday analysis of psychological data. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 433–456.
16. McGuire W.J. (1986). A perspectivist looks at contextualism and the future of behavioral science. In Ed. Rosnow R.L., Georgouds M., (Eds.), Contextualism and understanding in behavioral science, Implications for research and theory. (pp.271–301). New York Praeger.
17. Mosteller F., Fienberg S.E., Rouke R.E.K. (1983). Beginning statistics with data analysis. Reading, MA Addison-Wesley.
18. Paquin M.J.R. (1983), Beyond significant yet meaningless results in psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy, Theory, Research and Practice, 20, 38–40.
19. Rosenthal R. (1995). Writing meta analytic reviews. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 183–192.
20. Rosenthal R., Rosnow R.L. (1985), Contrast analysis. Focused companions in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, England Cambridge University Press.
21. Rosenthal R., Rosnow R.L. (1991), Essentials of behavioral reearch, Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.), New York McGraw-Hill.
22. Rosenlhal R., Rosnow R.L., Rubin D.B. (1996). Contrass analysis in behavioral research. Unpublished manuscript. Harvard University Cambridge, MA.
23. Rosenthal R.A., Rubin D.B. (1982), A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166–169.
24. Rosenthal R., Rubin D.B. (1994). The counternull value of an effect size. A new statistic, Philological Science, 5, 329–334.
25. Rosnow R.L. (1981). Paradigms in transition, The methodology of social inquiry, New York, Oxford University Press.
26. Rosnow R.L., Rosenthal R. (1988). Focused tests of significance and effect size estimation in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 203–208.
27. Rosnow R.L., Rosenthal R. (1989 a). Definition and interpretation of interacgtion effects. Psychological Bulletin. 105, 143–146.
28. Rosnow R.L., Rosenthal R. (1989 b). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276–1284.
29. Rosnow R.L., Rosenthal K. (1995). Some things you learn aren't so Cohen's paradox, Asch's paradigm and the interpretation of interaction. Psychological Science, 6, 3–9.
30. Rosnow R.L., Rosenthal R. (1996). Computing contrasts effect sizes and counternulls on other people's published data, General procedures for research consumers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
31. Rosnow R.L., Skleder A.A., Jaeger M.E., Rind B. (1994), Intelligence and the epistemics of interpersonal acumen Testing some implications of Gardner's theory. Intelligence, 19, 93–116.
32. Serlin R.C., Lapsley D.K. (1985). Rationality in psychological research. The good-enough principle. American Psychologist, 40, 78–83.
33. Thompson B., (Ed.), (1993). Statistical significant testing in contemporary practice. Some proposed alternatives with comments from journal editors [Special issue). Journal of Experimental Education, 61, (4).
34. Tukey J.W. (1991). The philosophy of multiple comparisons. Statistical Science, 6, 100–116.