Multimedia environmental chemical partitioning from molecular information

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 409, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 412-422

  Martínez, Izacar ^a   Grifoll, Jordi ^a   Giralt, Francesc ^a   Rallo, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

Author keywords

Domain of applicability; Multimedia environmental model; QSAR molecular descriptors; Quantitative structure fate relationships; Support vector regression; Uncertainty analysis

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN OF APPLICABILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DESCRIPTORS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURES; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION;

CONFORMAL MAPPING; DEGRADATION; INDICATORS (CHEMICAL); OXYGEN; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF ORGANIZING MAPS; SOIL TESTING; SPEECH RECOGNITION; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL; OXYGEN; WATER;

ALGORITHM; ERROR ANALYSIS; MODELING; PARTITIONING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

AIR; ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGRADATION; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; MULTIMEDIA; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE PROPERTY RELATION; SEDIMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; VEGETATION;

ATMOSPHERE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PLANTS; SOIL; WATER;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 78649733909     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.10.016     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Aronson D., Boethling R., Howard P., Stiteler W. Estimating biodegradation half-lives for use in chemical screening. Chemosphere 2006, 63:1953-1960.
2. Basheer I.A., Hajmeer M. Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. J Microbiol Meth 2000, 43:3-31.
3. Boethling R.S., Howard P.H., Beauman A.J., Lanosche M.E. Factors in intermedia extrapolation in biodegradability assessment. Chemosphere 1995, 30:741-752.
4. Boethling R.S., Howard P.H., Meylan W.M. Finding and estimating chemical property data for environmental assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 2004, 23:2290-2308.
5. Brandes L.J., den Hollander H., van de Meent D. SimpleBox 2.0: a nested multimedia fate model for evaluating the environmental fate of chemicals 1996, 156. RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
6. Bredow T., Jug K. Theory and range of modern semiempirical molecular orbital methods. Theor Chim Acta 2005, 113:1-14.
7. Breivik K., Wania F. Expanding the applicability of multimedia fate models to polar organic chemicals. Environ Sci Technol 2003, 37:4934-4943.
8. Breivik K., Alcock R., Li Y.-F., Bailey R.E., Fiedler H., Pacyna J.M. Primary sources of selected POPs: regional and global scale emission inventories. Environ Pollut 2004, 128:3-16.
9. Breivik K., Vestreng V., Rozovskaya O., Pacyna J.M. Atmospheric emissions of some POPs in Europe: a discussion of existing inventories and data needs. Environ Sci Policy 2006, 9:663-674.
10. Brüggemann R., Restrepo G., Voigt K. Structure-fate relationships of organic chemicals derived from the software packages E4CHEM and WHASSE. J Chem Inf Model 2006, 46:894-902.
11. Burden F.R., Polley M.J., Winkler D.A. Toward novel universal descriptors: charge fingerprints. J Chem Inf Model 2009, 49:710-715.
12. Byvatov E., Fechner U., Sadowski J., Schneider G. Comparison of support vector machine and artificial neural network systems for drug/nondrug classification. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003, 43:1882-1889.
13. Citra M.J. Incorporating Monte Carlo analysis into multimedia environmental fate models. Environ Toxicol Chem 2004, 23:1629-1633.
14. Cohen Y. Pollutants in a multimedia environment. Workshop on pollutant transport and accumulation in a multimedia environment 1986, Plenum Press, New York. Y. Cohen (Ed.).
15. Cohen Y., Cooter E.J. Multimedia environmental distribution of toxics (Mend-Tox). I: hybrid compartmental-spatial modeling framework. Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manage 2002, 6:70-86.
16. Cohen Y., Cooter E.J. Multimedia environmental distribution of toxics (Mend-Tox). II: software implementation and case studies. Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manage 2002, 6:87-101.
17. European Commission. Technical guidance document on risk assessment, part III. Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, European Chemicals Bureau, 2003.
18. Cronin M.T.D., Schultz T.W. Pitfalls in QSAR. Theochem J Mol Struct 2003, 622:39-51.
19. Cronin M.T., Walker J.D., Jaworska J.S., Comber M.H., Watts C.D., Worth A.P. Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances. Environ Health Perspect 2003, 111:1376-1390.
20. den Hollander H.A., van de Meent D. Appendix to SimpleBox 3.0: A multimedia mass balance model for evaluating the environmental fate of Chemicals 2004, RIVM.
21. den Hollander H.A., van Eijkeren J.C.H., van de Meent D. SimpleBox 3.0 2004, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
22. Devillers J. A decade of research in environmental QSAR. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2003, 14:1-6.
23. Diudea M.V. QSPR/QSAR studies by molecular descriptors 2001, Nova, New York.
24. Drucker H., Burges C.J.C., Kaufman L., Smola A., Vapnik V. Support vector regression machines. Advances in neural information processing systems 9. Proceedings of the 1996 conference 1997, 155-161. MIT Press, Denver, CO, USA, Dec 2-5.
25. Duca J.S., Hopfinger A.J. Estimation of molecular similarity based on 4D-QSAR analysis: formalism and validation. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2001, 41:1367-1387.
26. Efroymson R.A., Murphy D.L. Ecological risk assessment of multimedia hazardous air pollutants: estimating exposure and effects. Sci Total Environ 2001, 274(1-3):219-230.
27. Eisenberg J.N.S., Bennett D.H., McKone T.E. Chemical dynamics of persistent organic pollutants: a sensitivity analysis relating soil concentration levels to atmospheric emissions. Environ Sci Technol 1998, 32:115-123.
28. Fenner K., Scheringer M., Macleod M., Matthies M., McKone T., Stroebe M., et al. Comparing estimates of persistence and long-range transport potential among multimedia models. Environ Sci Technol 2005, 39:1932-1942.
29. Fjodorova N., Novich M., Vrachko M., Smirnov V., Kharchevnikova N., Zholdakova Z., et al. Directions in QSAR modeling for regulatory uses in OECD member countries, EU Russia. J Environ Sci Health Pt C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 2008, 26:201-236.
30. Fujitsu BGo CAChe software 2004, BioSciences Group, Fujitsu Computer Systems, Beaverton.
31. Furusjö E., Svenson A., Rahmberg M., Andersson M. The importance of outlier detection and training set selection for reliable environmental QSAR predictions. Chemosphere 2006, 63:99-108.
32. Godavarthy S.S., Robinson J.R.L., Gasem K.A.M. SVRC-QSPR model for predicting saturated vapor pressures of pure fluids. Fluid Phase Equilib 2006, 246:39-51.
33. Golbraikh A., Tropsha A. Beware of q2!. J Mol Graph Model 2002, 20:269-276.
34. Hall MA. Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning. Department of Computer Science. Ph.D. thesis. The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, 1999.
35. Howard P.H., Boethling R.S., Jarvis W.F., Meylan W.M., Michalenko E.M. Handbook of environmental degradation rates 1991, Lewis Publishers, Boca Ratón.
36. Hugo K. From narcosis to hyperspace: the history of QSAR. Quant Struct Act Relat 2002, 21:348-356.
37. Johnson S.R. The trouble with QSAR (or how i learned to stop worrying and embrace fallacy). J Chem Inf Model 2008, 48:25-26.
38. Junge C.E. Fate of pollutants in the air and water environment 1977, Wiley-Interscience.
39. Junge C.E. Basic considerations about trace constituents in the atmosphere is related to the fate of global pollutants. Advances in Environmental Science and Technology 1977, vol. 8. Wiley-Interscience, New York, Part I. I.H. Suffet (Ed.).
40. Kawamoto K., MacLeod M., Mackay D. Evaluation and comparison of multimedia mass balance models of chemical fate: application of EUSES and ChemCAN to 68 chemicals in Japan. Chemosphere 2001, 44:599-612.
41. Klöpffer W., Wagner B.O. Persistence revisited. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2007, 14:141-142.
42. Kohonen T. Self-organizing maps 2001, Springer, Berlin. 3rd ed.
43. Kohonen T., Oja E., Simula O., Visa A., Kangas J. Engineering applications of the self-organizing map. Proc IEEE 1996, 84(10):1358-1384.
44. Kühne R., Breitkopf C., Schüürmann G. Error propagation in fucacity level-III models in the case of uncertain physicochemical properties. Environ Toxicol Chem 1997, 16:2067-2069.
45. Kühne R., Ebert R.-U., Schüürmann G. Estimation of compartmental half-lives of organic compounds-structural similarity versus EPI-suite. QSAR Comb Sci 2007, 26:542-549.
46. Kühne R., Ebert R.U., Schüürmann G. Chemical domain of QSAR models form atom-centered fragments. J Chem Inf Model 2009, 49:2660-2669.
47. Lohmann R., Breivik K., Dachs J., Muir D. Global fate of POPs: current and future research directions. Environ Pollut 2007, 150:150-165.
48. Mackay D. Multimedia environmental models-the fugacity approach 2001, Lewis Publishers, Boca Ratón.
49. Mackay D., Webster E. A perspective on environmental models and QSARs. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2003, 14:7-16.
50. Mackay D., Webster E. Environmental persistence of chemicals. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2006, 13:43-49.
51. Mackay D., Shiu W.-Y., Ma K.C. Illustrated handbook of physical-chemical properties and environmental fate for organic chemicals 1992, Lewis Publishers Inc.
52. Mackay D., Hubbarde J., Webster E. The role of QSARs and fate models in chemical hazard and risk assessment. QSAR Comb Sci 2003, 22:106-112.
53. Martínez I, Quantitative structure fate relationships for multimedia environmental analysis. Ph.D. thesis. Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain, 2010.
54. Mierswa I., Wurst M., Klinkenberg R., Scholz M., Euler T. YALE: rapid prototyping for complex data mining tasks. Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-06) 2006, 935-940. ACM, Philadelphia, PA, USA. L. Ungar, M. Craven, D. Gunopulos, T. Eliassi-Rad (Eds.).
55. Modarresi H., Modarress H., Dearden J.C. QSPR model of Henry's law constant for a diverse set of organic chemicals based on genetic algorithm-radial basis function network approach. Chemosphere 2007, 66:2067-2076.
56. Nikolova N., Jaworska J. Approaches to measure chemical similarity-a review. QSAR Comb Sci 2003, 22:1006-1026.
57. Chemical risk information platform (CHRIP) 2006, NITE, National Institute of Technology and Evaluation.
58. Guidance document on the validation of (quantitative) structure-activity relationship [(Q)SAR] models. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment 2007, 69. OECD.
59. Pearson K. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Phil Mag 1901, 2:559-572.
60. Prinn R.G., Huang J., Weiss R.F., Cunnold D.M., Fraser P.J., Simmonds P.G., et al. Evidence for substantial variations of atmospheric hydroxyl radicals in the past two decades. Science 2001, 292:1882-1888.
61. Raymond J.W., Rogers T.N., Shonnard D.R., Kline A.A. A review of structure-based biodegradation estimation methods. J Hazard Mater 2001, 84:189-215.
62. Saeys Y., Inza I., Larranaga P. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2507-2517.
63. Schroeter T., Schwaighofer A., Mika S., Ter Laak A., Suelzle D., Ganzer U., et al. Estimating the domain of applicability for machine learning QSAR models: a study on aqueous solubility of drug discovery molecules. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2007, 21:651-664.
64. Schüürmann G., Ebert R.-U., Chen J., Wang B., Kuühne R. External validation and prediction employing the predictive squared correlation coefficient-test set activity mean vs training set activity mean. J Chem Inf Model 2008, 48:2140-2145.
65. Schwarzenbach R.P., Gschwend P.M., Imboden D.M. Environmental organic chemistry 2003, Wiley, New Jersey. 2nd ed.
66. Senese C.L., Duca J., Pan D., Hopfinger A.J., Tseng Y.J. 4D-Fingerprints, Universal QSAR and QSPR Descriptors. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2004, 44:1526-1539.
67. SRC. Interactive PhysProp Database Demo. Syracuse Research Corporation.SRC. EPI Suite v4.00. SRC, 2008.
68. Stouch T.R., Kenyon J.R., Johnson S.R., Chen X.-Q., Doweyko A., Li Y. In silico ADME/Tox: why models fail. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2003, 17:83-92.
69. Struijs J., Peijnenburg W.J.G.M. Predictions by the multimedia environmental fate model SimpleBox compared to field data: Intermedia concentration ratios of two phthalate esters 2002, 62. RIVM, Bilthoven.
70. Taskinen J., Yliruusi J. Prediction of physicochemical properties based on neural network modelling. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2003, 55:1163-1183.
71. Tickner J., Geiser K., Coffin M. The U.S. experience in promoting sustainable chemistry. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2005, 12:115-123.
72. Todeschini R., Consonni V. Handbook of molecular descriptors 2000, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
73. Toose L., Woodfine D.G., MacLeod M., Mackay D., Gouin J. BETR-World: a geographically explicit model of chemical fate: application to transport of [alpha]-HCH to the Arctic. Environ Pollut 2004, 128:223-240.
74. Toussant M. A scientific milestone. Chem Eng News 2009, 87:3.
75. U.S. EPA Office of pollution prevention and toxics 2001, U.S. EPA, Persistence, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) profiler, Washington DC. http://www.epa.gov/oppt/sf/tools/pbtprofiler.htm.
76. Inventory Update Rule. Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 2006, US-EPA, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. http://www.epa.gov/oppt/iur.
77. van de Meent D. SIMPLEBOX: a generic multimedia fate evaluation model 1993, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
78. Vesanto J., Himberg J., Alhoniemi E., Parhankangas J. SOM Toolbox for Matlab 5, 2000 2000.
79. Walker J.D., Carlsen L., Hulzebos E., Simon-Hettich B. Global Government applications of analogues, SARs and QSARs to predict aquatic toxicity, chemical or physical properties, environmental fate parameters and health effects of organic chemicals. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2002, 13:607-616.
80. Weaver S., Gleeson M.P. The importance of the domain of applicability in QSAR modeling. J Mol Graph Model 2008, 26:1315-1326.
81. Webster E., Mackay D., Di Guardo A., Kane D., Woodfine D. Regional differences in chemical fate model outcome. Chemosphere 2004, 55:1361-1376.
82. Weininger D. A chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1988, 28:31-36.
83. Witten I.H., Frank E. Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques 2005, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, U.S.
84. Worth A.P., Bassan A., De Bruijn J., Saliner A.G., Netzeva T., Patlewicz G., et al. The role of the European Chemicals Bureau in promoting the regulatory use of (Q)SAR methods. QSAR Environ Res 2007, 18:111-125.
85. Xu Y., Zomer S., Brereton R.G. Support vector machines: a recent method for classification in chemometrics. Crit Rev Anal Chem 2006, 36:177-188.
86. Yaffe D., Cohen Y. Neural network based temperature-dependent quantitative structure property relations (QSPRs) for predicting vapor pressure of hydrocarbons. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2001, 41:463-477.
87. Yaffe D., Cohen Y., Espinosa G., Arenas A., Giralt F. A fuzzy ARTMAP based on quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPRs) for predicting aqueous solubility of organic compounds. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2001, 41:1177-1207.
88. Yaffe D., Cohen Y., Espinosa G., Arenas A., Giralt F. Fuzzy ARTMAP and back-propagation neural networks based quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPRs) for octanol-water partition coefficient of organic compounds. J Chem Inf Model 2002, 42:162-183.
89. Yaffe D., Cohen Y., Espinosa G., Giralt F., Arenas A. A fuzzy ARTMAP-based quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) for the Henry's Law constant of organic compounds. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003, 43:85-112.
90. Zukowska B., Breivik K., Wania F. Evaluating the environmental fate of pharmaceuticals using a level III model based on poly-parameter linear free energy relationships. Sci Total Environ 2006, 359:177-187.