Estimation of Molecular Similarity Based on 4D-QSAR Analysis: Formalism and Validation

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 41, Issue 3-6, 2001, Pages 1367-1387

  Duca, José S ^a,b   Hopfinger, A J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACIDS; DATA REDUCTION; HYDROGEN BONDS;

ABSOLUTE MOLECULAR SIMILARITY (AMS);

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

EID: 0035470284     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci0100090     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Nalewajski, R. F.; Parr, R. G. Information theory, atoms in molecules and molecular similaritypp. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. - Paper Edition 2000, 97(16), 8879-9225.
2. Pollack, N.; Cunningham, A. R.; Klopman, G.; Rosenkranz, H. S. Chemical Diversity Approach for Evaluating Mechanistic Relatedness among Toxicological Phenomena. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 1999, 10-(6), 533-544.
3. Xu, J. Chemical Diversity Exploration and Combinatorial Chemistry in Drug Discovery. Prog. Chem. -Beijing 1999, 11(3), 286-299.
4. Ivanciuc, O.; Taraviras, S. L.; Cabrol-Bass, D. Quasi-orthogonal basis sets of molecular graph descriptors as a chemical diversity measure. J. Chem. Inf. Computer Sci. 2000, 40(1), 126-134.
5. Popelier, L. A. Quantum Molecular Similarity. 1. BCP Space. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103(15), 2883-2890.
6. Willett, P. Chemoinformatics - similarity and diversity in chemical libraries. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2000, 11(1), 85-88.
7. Willet, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38(6), 983-996 (see page 986).
8. Szarek, S. J.; Voiculescu, D. Volumes of restricted minkowski sums and the free analogue of the entropy power inequality. Comm. Math. Phys. 1996, 178(3), 563-570.
9. Gabarro-Arpa, J.; Revilla, R. Clustering of a molecular dynamics trajectory with a hamming distance. Computers Chem. 2000, 24(6), 693-698.
10. Ashton, M. J.; Jaye, M. C.; Mason, J. S. New perspectives in lead generation II: evaluating molecular diversity. Drug Discovery Today 1996, 1, 71-78.
11. McGregor, M. J.; Pallai, P. V. Clustering of large databases of compounds: using MDL keys as structural descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 443-448.
12. Miller M. M.; Sheridan, R. F.; Kearsley, S. K. SQ: a program for rapidly producing pharmacophorically relevant molecular superpositions. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 1505-1514.
13. (a) Pickett, S. D.; Mason, J. S.; McLay, I. M. Diversity profiling and design using 3D pharmacophores: pharmacophore-derived queries (PDQ). J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 1214-1223.
14. (b) Mason, J.D.; Morize, I.; Menard, P. R.; Cheney, D. L.; Hulme, C.; Labaudiniere, R. L. New 4-point pharmacophore method for molecular similarity and diversity applications: overview of the method and applications, including a novel approach to the design of combinatorial libraries containing privileged substructures. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3251-3264.
15. (a) Silverman, B. D.; Platt, D. E. Comparative molecular field moment analysis (CoMMA). J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 2129-2140.
16. (b) Silverman, B. D. Three-dimensional moments of molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1470-1476.
17. Cramer, R. D.; Poss, M. A.; Hermsmeier, M. A.; Caufield, T. J.; Kowala, M. C.; Valentine, M. T.; Prospective identification of biologically active structures by topomer shape similarity searching. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3919-3933.
18. (a) Hopfinger, A. J.; Duca, J. S. Extraction of pharmacophore information from high-throughput screens. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2000, 11(1), 97-103.
19. (b) Pharmacophore Perception, Development and Use in Drug Design Guner O. F., Ed.; International University Line: La Jolla, CA, 2000.
20. Doherty, D. C. MOLSIM User's Guide; The Chem21 Group, Inc.: 1780 Wilson Dr., Lake forest. IL, 1997.
21. Hopfinger, A. J.; Wang, S.; Tokarski, J. S.; Jin, B.; Albuquerque, M.; Madhav, P. J.; Duraiswami, C. Construction of 3D-QSAR models using the 4D-QSAR analysis formalism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10509-10524.
22. Albuquerque, M. G.; Hopfinger, A. J.; Barreiro, E. J.; deAlencastro, R. B. Four-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of a series of interphenylene 7-oxabicycloheptane oxazole thromboxane A2 receptor antagonists. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 925-938.
23. Venkatarangan, P.; Hopfinger, A. J. Prediction of ligand-receptor binding free energy by 4D-QSAR analysis: application to a set of glucose inhibitors of glycogen phosphorylase. J Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1141-1150.
24. Hopfinger, A. J.; Reaka, A. Venkatarangan, P.; Duca, J. S.; Wang S. Construction of a Virtual high throughput screen by 4D-QSAR analysis: application to a combinatorial library of glucose inhibitors of glycogen phosphorylase b. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1151-1160.
25. Press, W. H.; Teukolsky, S. A.; Vettering, W. T.; Flannery, B. P. Numerical Recipes in C. The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed.: Cambridge University Press: London, 1997; pp 463.
26. (a) Phelan, J. C. Libraries to leads: which molecules should we make? Cheminformatics Symp. 1998, June 15-16, Boston, MA.
27. (b) Mount, J.; Ruppert, J.; Welsh, W.; Jain, A. N.; Icepick: a flexible surface-based system for molecular diversity. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 60-66.