Conceptualising research performance

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 889-903

  Bazeley, Pat ^a  

^a Research Support P/L   (Australia)

Author keywords

Academic performance; Concept analysis; Research active status; Research assessment; Research performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649599848     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075070903348404     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Åkerlind, G.S. 2008. An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education 33, no. 1: 17-31.
2. Archer, L. 2008. Younger academics' constructions of 'authenticity', 'success' and professional identity. Studies in Higher Education 33, no. 4: 385-403.
3. Batterham, R. 2004. Measuring excellence: A chief scientist perspective. In Measuring excellence in research and research training, National Academies Forum, June 22, 3-8. Canberra: The Academy of Science.
4. Bazeley, P. 2006a. Research dissemination in creative arts, humanities and the social sciences. Higher Education Research and Development 25, no. 3: 215-29.
5. Bazeley, P. 2006b. The contribution of computer software to integrating qualitative and quantitative data and analyses. Research in the Schools 13, no. 1: 63-73.
6. Bazeley, P. 2009a. Mixed methods data analysis. In Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences, ed. S. Andrew and E. Halcomb, 84-118.Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell
7. Bazeley, P. 2009b. Integrating analyses in mixed methods research [Editorial]. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3, no. 3: 203-7.
8. Bourdieu, P. 2001. Homo academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press
9. Bowden, J., P. Green, N. Cherry, and R. Usher. 2005. Academics' ways of understanding success in research activities. In Doing developmental phenomenography, ed. J. Bowden and P. Green, 128-144. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
10. Boyatzis, R.E. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Brew, A. 2001. Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education 26: 271-85.
12. Bruce, C., B. Pham, and I. Stoodley. 2004. Constituting the significance and value of research: Views from information technology academics and industry professionals. Studies in Higher Education 29: 219-38.
13. Creamer, E.G. 1998. Assessing faculty publication productivity: Issues of equity, vol. 26. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
14. Frost, P.J., and R.E. Stablein. 1992. Doing exemplary research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Goertz, G. 2006. Social science concepts: A user's guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Marton, F. 1981. Phenomenography - Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science 10: 177-200.
17. McNay, I. 2003. Assessing the assessment: An analysis of the UK Research Assessment Exercise, 2001, and its outcomes, with special reference to research in education. Science and Public Policy 30, no. 1: 47-54.
18. Moss, G., and K. Kubacki. 2007. Researchers in higher education: A neglected focus of study? Journal of Further and Higher Education 31, no. 3: 297-310.
19. Nussbaum, M.C. 1992. Human functioning and social justice: In defence of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory 20, no. 2: 202-46.
20. Steele, C. 2004. Changing research practices in the digital information and communication environment. In Measuring excellence in research and research, training, National Academies Forum, June 22, 61-71. Canberra: The Academy of Science.
21. Steele, C., L. Butler, and D. Kingsley. 2006. The publishing imperative: The pervasive influence of publication metrics. Learned Publishing 19: 277-90.
22. Tight, M. 2004. Research into higher education: An a-theoretical community of practice? Higher Education Research and Development 23, no. 4: 395-411.