Research dissemination in creative arts, humanities and the social sciences

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 307-321

  Bazeley, Pat ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649621972     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07294360600793101     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Allen Consulting Group. 2005. Measuring the impact of publicly funded research, Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Education, Science and Training. Retrieved September 30, 2005, from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/research_sector/publications_resources/profiles/measuring_the_impact_publicly_funded_research.htm
2. Batterham, R., 2004. “ Measuring excellence: A chief scientist perspective ”. In Measuring excellence in research and research training, 3–8. Canberra: The Academy of Science. In National Academies Forum (Ed.)
3. Becher, T., 1987. Disciplinary discourse. Studies in Higher Education, 12: 261–274.
4. Creamer, E. G., 1998. Assessing faculty publication productivity: Issues of equity, Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 26(2))
5. Creswell, J. W., 1986. “ Concluding thoughts: Observing, promoting, evaluating and reviewing research performance ”. In Measuring faculty research performance, Edited by: Creswell, J. W., 87–102. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Expert Advisory Group (EAG). 2005. Research quality framework: Assessing the quality and impact of research in Australia. The preferred model, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Education, Science and Training. Retrieved September 23, 2005, from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/research_sector/policies_issues_reviews/key_issues/research_quality_framework/rqf_preferred_model.htm
7. Graham, R., 2004. “ Excellence in investigator-driven research ”. In Measuring excellence in research and research training, 10–16. Canberra: The Academy of Science. In National Academies Forum (Ed.)
8. McCalman, I., 2004. “ Excellence in the humanities, creative arts and media ”. In Measuring excellence in research and research training, 20–25. Canberra: The Academy of Science. In National Academies Forum (Ed.)
9. Morgan, K. J., 2004. The research assessment exercise in English universities, 2001. Higher Education, 48: 461–482.
10. National Academies Forum. (Ed.). 2004. Measuring excellence in research and research training, Canberra: The Academy of Science. Retrieved September 30, 2005, from http://www.science.org.au/proceedings/researchexcellence
11. Rhoades, G., 2001. Managing productivity in an academic institution: Rethinking the whom, which, what, and whose of productivity. Research in Higher Education, 42(5): 619–633.
12. Steele, C., 2004. “ Changing research practices in the digital information and communication environment ”. In Measuring excellence in research and research training, 61–71. Canberra: The Academy of Science. In National Academies Forum (Ed.)
13. Toutkoushian, R. K., Porter, S. R., Danielson, C., and Hollis, P. R., 2003. Using publication counts to measure an institution’s research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 44(2): 121–148.