Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 155-163

  Janson, Guilherme ^a   Branco, Nuria Castello ^a   Fernandes, Thais Maria Freire ^a   Sathler, Renata ^a   Garib, Daniela ^a   Lauris, José Roberto Pereira ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Esthetics; Orthodontics

Indexed keywords

CHEEK; DENTAL CARE; FACE ASYMMETRY; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTICS; REVIEW; TOOTH EXTRACTION;

CHEEK; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; HUMANS; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; SMILING; TOOTH EXTRACTION;

EID: 78649585167     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/040710-195.1     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Isiksal E, Hazar S, Akyalcin S. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:8-16.
2. Parekh S, Fields HW, Beck FM, Rosenstiel SF. The acceptability of variations in smile arc and buccal corridor space. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2007;10:15-21.
3. Beyer JW, Lindauer SJ. Evaluation of dental midline position. Semin Orthod. 1998;4:146-152.
4. Gul-e-Erum, Fida M. Changes in smile parameters as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, artists, and laypeople. World J Orthod. 2008;9:132-140.
5. Johnson DK, Smith RJ. Smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:162-167.
6. Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21:517-522.
7. Ker AJ, Chan R, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson's perspective: a computer-based survey study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139: 1318-1327.
8. Kim E, Gianelly AA. Extraction vs nonextraction: arch widths and smile esthetics. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:354-358.
9. Kokich VO Jr, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11:311-324.
10. Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza M. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:748-753.
11. Rodrigues CD, Magnani R, Machado MS, Oliveira OB. The perception of smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod. 2009;79: 634-639.
12. Shyagali TR, Chandralekha B, Bhayya DP, Kumar S, Balasubramanyam G. Are ratings of dentofacial attractiveness influenced by dentofacial midline discrepancies? Aust Orthod J. 2008;24:91-95.
13. Thomas JL, Hayes C, Zawaydeh S. The effect of axial midline angulation on dental esthetics. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73:359-364.
14. Gracco A, Cozzani M, D'Elia L, Manfrini M, Peverada CGS. The smile buccal corridors: aesthetic value for dentists and laypersons. Prog Orthod. 2006;7:56-65.
15. Ioi H, Nakata S, Counts AL. Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese. Angle Orthod. 2009;79: 628-633.
16. Martin A, Buschang P, Boley J, Taylor R, McKinney T. The impact of buccal corridors on smile attractiveness. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:530-537.
17. McNamara L, McNamara JA Jr, Ackerman MB, Baccetti T. Hard- and soft-tissue contributions to the esthetics of the posed smile in growing patients seeking orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133: 491-499.
18. Moore T, Southard KA, Casko JS, Qian F, Southard TE. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:208-213.
19. Parekh SM, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76:557-563.
20. Roden-Johnson D, Gallerano R, English J. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:343-350.
21. Brisman AS. Esthetics: a comparison of dentists' and patients' concepts. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980;100:345-352.
22. Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod. 1970;57:132-144.
23. Jerrold L, Lowenstein LJ. The midline: diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97: 453-462.
24. Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;29:358-382.
25. Dierkes JM. The beauty of the face: an orthodontic perspective. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987;Spec No:89E-95E.
26. Frush JO, Fisher RD. The dynesthetic interpretation of the dentogenic concept. J Prosthet Dent. 1958;8:558-582.
27. Sarver DM. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:98-111.
28. Tulloch JF, Medland W, Tuncay OC. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:340-347.
29. Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:141-151.
30. Kerns LL, Silveira AM, Kerns DG, Regennitter FJ. Esthetic preference of the frontal and profile views of the same smile. J Esthet Dent. 1997;9:76-85.