Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 628-633

  Ioi, Hideki ^a   Nakata, Shunsuke ^a   Counts, Amy L ^b  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JACKSONVILLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attractiveness; Buccal corridor; Japanese; Smile esthetics; Visual analog scale

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEEK; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL STUDENT; DENTIST; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; JAPAN; MALE;

ADULT; CHEEK; DENTISTS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; SMILING; STUDENTS, DENTAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68149164859     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/080708-410.1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Shaw WC, Rees G, Charles CR. The influence of dentofa-cial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod. 1985;87:21-26.
2. Peck S, Peck L. Selected aspects of the art and science of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:5-26.
3. Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod. 1970;57:132-144.
4. Mackley RJ. An evaluation of smiles before and after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1993;63:183-189.
5. Kokich VO Jr, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11:311-324.
6. Sarver D. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:98-111.
7. Sarver D, Ackerman M. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:116-127.
8. Frush JP, Fisher RD. The dynesthetic interpretation of the dentogenic concept. J Prosthet Dent. 1958;8:558-581.
9. Moore T, Southard KA, Casko JS, Qian F, Southard TE. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dento-facial Orthop. 2005;127:208-213.
10. Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27:485-489.
11. Kelly AM. Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5:1086-1090.
12. Powell CV, Kelly AM, Williams A. Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37:28-31.
13. Parekh SM, Fields HW, Rosenstiel SF, Beck FM. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor spaces as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Or-thod. 2006;76:557-563.
14. Ohnhaus EE, Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1975;1:379-384.
15. Krishnan V, Daniel S, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:515-523.
16. Martin AJ, Buschang PH, Boley JC, Taylor RW, McKinney TW. The impact of buccal corridors on smile attractiveness. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:530-537.
17. Ritter DE, Gandini LG, Pinto Ados S, Locks A. Esthetic influence of negative space in the buccal corridor during smiling. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:198-203.
18. Roden-Johnson D, Gallerano R, English J. The effects of buccal corridors spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:343-350.
19. Gracco A, Cozzani M, D'Elia L, Manfrini M, Peverada C, Siciliani G. The smile buccal corridors: aesthetic value for dentists and laypersons. Prog Orthod. 2006;7:56-65.
20. Parekh S, Fields HW, Beck FM, Rosenstiel SF. The acceptability of variations in smile arc and buccal corridor space. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2006;10:15-21.