Toward a better understanding of the justice judgment process: The influence of fair and unfair events on state justice sensitivity

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1294-1301

  Wijn, Remco ^a   Van Den Bos, Kees ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649579646     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.709     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
2. Anderson, C. A., Berkowitz, L., Donnerstein, E., Huesmann, L. R., Johnson, J., Linz, D., et al. (2003). The influence of media violence on youth. Psychological Science: Public Interest, 4, 81-110.
3. Ardelt, M. (2000). Still stable after all these years? Personality stability theory revisited. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 392-405.
4. Bobocel, D. R., Agar, S. E., Meyer, J. P., & Irving, P. G. (1998). Managerial accounts and fairness perceptions in conflict resolution: Differentiating the effects of minimizing responsibility and providing justification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 133-143.
5. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.
6. Carnagey, L. N., Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2007). The effect of video game violence on physiological desensitization to real-life violence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 489-496.
7. Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453-484.
8. Cohen, R. L. (1986). Justice: Views from the social sciences. New York: Plenum.
9. Fanti, K. A., Vanman, E., Heinrich, C. C., & Avraamides, M. N. (2009). Desensitization to media violence over a short period of time. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 179-187.
10. Fetchenhauer, D., & Huang, X. (2004). Justice sensitivity and behavior in experimental games. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1015-1031.
11. Finkel, N. J. (2001). Not fair! The typology of common sense unfairness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12. Folger, R. (Ed.), (1984). The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives. New York: Plenum.
13. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Gollwitzer, M., Schmitt, M., Schalke, R., Maes, J., & Baer, A. (2005). Asymetrical effects of justice sensitivity perspectives on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Social Justice Research, 18, 183-201.
15. Hafer, C. L. (2000). Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified stroop task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 165-173.
16. Ham, J., & Van den Bos, K. (2008). Not fair for me! The influence of personal relevance on social justice inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 699-705.
17. Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
18. Lerner, M. J., & Lerner, S. C. (Eds.), (1981). The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change. New York: Plenum.
19. Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational behavior (pp. 56-88). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20. Lind, E. A., Greenberg, J., Scott, K. S., & Welchans, T. D. (2000). The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination claims. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 557-590.
21. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
22. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford.
23. Mikula, G. (1994). Perspective related differences in interpretations of injustice by victims and victimizers. In M. J. Lerner, & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond (pp. 175-203). New York: Plenum Press.
24. Mohiyeddini, C., & Schmitt, M. (1997). Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to unfair treatment in a laboratory situation. Social Justice Research, 10, 333-352.
25. Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3-25.
26. Schmitt, M., & Dörfel, M. (1999). Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 443-453.
27. Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., & Arbach, D. (2005). Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202-211.
28. Schmitt, M., & Mohiyeddini, C. (1996). Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real life disadvantage. Social Justice Research, 9, 223-238.
29. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why do people obey the law? Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. Van den Bos, K. (1999). What are we talking about when we talk about no-voice procedures? On the psychology of the fair outcome effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 560-577.
32. Van den Bos, K., & Van Prooijen, J.-W. (2001). Referent cognitions theory: The role of closeness of reference points in the psychology of voice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 616-626.
33. Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 95-104.
34. Vermunt, R., Wit, A., Van den Bos, K., & Lind, A. (1996). The effect of inaccurate procedure on protest: The mediating role of perceived unfairness and situational self-esteem. Social Justice Research, 9, 109-119.
35. Wijn, R., & Van den Bos, K. (in press). On the social-communicative function of justice: The influence of communication goals and personal involvement on the use of justice assertions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.