Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in high myopic eyes in a population-based setting

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 50, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 5281-5287

  Tsutsumi, Tae ^a,b   Tomidokoro, Atsuo ^b   Saito, Hitomi ^a,b   Hashizum, Akihiro ^a,b   Iwase, Aiko ^a   Araie, Makoto ^b  

^a Tajimi Municipal Hospital   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CORNEA THICKNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; NERVE FIBER; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC DISK CUP; OPTIC DISK OVALITY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LASERS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA, DEGENERATIVE; NERVE FIBERS; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 78649403448     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-3301     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Mitchell P, Hourihan F, Sandbach J, Wang JJ. The relationship between glaucoma and myopia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2010-2015.
2. Wu SY, Nemesure B, Leske MC. Refractive errors in a black adult population: the Barbados Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2179-2184.
3. Wong TY, Klein BE, Klein R, Knudtson M, Lee KE. Refractive errors, intraocular pressure, and glaucoma in a white population. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:211-217.
4. Suzuki Y, Iwase A, Araie M, et al. Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma in a Japanese population the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1613-1617.
5. Xu L, Li J, Cui T, et al. Refractive error in urban and rural adult Chinese in Beijing. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1676-1683.
6. Mikelberg FW, Wijsman K, Schulzer M. Reproducibility of topographic parameters obtained with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. J Glaucoma. 1993;2:101-103.
7. Lusky M, Bosem ME, Weinreb RN. Reproducibility of optic nerve head topography measurements in eyes with undilated pupils. J Glaucoma. 1993;2:104-109.
8. Rohrschneider K, Burk RO, Kruse FE, Volcker HE. Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1044-1049.
9. Nakamura H, Maeda T, Suzuki Y, Inoue Y. Scanning laser tomography to evaluate optic discs of normal eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1999;43:410-414.
10. Leung CK, Cheng AC, Chong KK, et al. Optic disc measurements in myopia with optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48: 3178-3183.
11. Abe H, Shirakashi M, Tsutsumi T, et al. Laser scanning tomography of optic discs of the normal Japanese population in a populationbased setting. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:223-230.
12. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Blumenthal EZ, et al. Imaging of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer: the effects of age, optic disc area, refractive error, and gender. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002;19:197-207.
13. Durukan AH, Yucel I, Akar Y, Bayraktar MZ. Assessment of optic nerve head topographic parameters with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;32:259-264.
14. Tong L, Chan YH, Gazzard G, et al. Heidelberg retinal tomography of optic disc and nerve fiber layer in Singapore children: variations with disc tilt and refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:4939-4944.
15. Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1641-1648.
16. Yamamoto T, Iwase A, Araie M, et al. The Tajimi Study report 2: prevalence of primary angle closure and secondary glaucoma in a Japanese population. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1661-1669.
17. Heidelbeeg Engineering GmbH. Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II Operating Instructions. Software Version 1.6. Dossenheim, Germany: Heidelbeeg Engineering GmBh,. 2001:5-17.
18. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GO. Optic disk morphometry in high myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988;226:587-590.
19. Xu L, Li Y, Wang S, Wang Y, Jonas JB. Characteristics of highly myopic eyes: the Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114: 121-126.
20. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Hee J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2486-2494.
21. Bourne RR, Dineen BP, Ali SM, Noorul Huq DM, Johnson GJ. Prevalence of refractive error in Bangladeshi adults: results of the National Blindness and Low Vision Survey of Bangladesh. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1150-1160.
22. Wickremasinghe S, Foster PJ, Uranchimeg D, et al. Ocular biometry and refraction in Mongolian adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:776-783.
23. Sawada A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Iwase A, Yamamoto T. Refractive errors in an elderly Japanese population: the Tajimi study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:363-370, e-363.
24. Gabriele ML, Wollstein G, Bilonick RA, et al. Comparison of parameters from Heidelberg Retina Tomographs 2 and 3. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:673-677.
25. Garway-Heath DF, Rudnicka AR, Lowe T, Foster PJ, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Measurement of optic disc size: equivalence of methods to correct for ocular magnification. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:643-649.
26. Ramrattan RS, Wolfs RC, Jonas JB, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Determinants of optic disc characteristics in a general population: The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1588-1596.
27. Varma R, Tielsch JM, Quigley HA, et al. Race-, age-, gender-, and refractive error-related differences in the normal optic disc. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:1068-1076.
28. Wang Y, Xu L, Zhang L, Yang H, Ma Y, Jonas JB. Optic disc size in a population based study in northern China: the Beijing Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:353-356.
29. Jonas JB, Thomas R, George R, Berenshtein E, Muliyil J. Optic disc morphology in south India: the Vellore Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:189-196.
30. Tay E, Seah SK, Chan SP, et al. Optic disk ovality as an index of tilt and its relationship to myopia and perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:247-252.
31. Jonas JB, Kling F, Grundler AE. Optic disc shape, corneal astigmatism, and amblyopia. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1934-1937.
32. Budenz DL, Anderson DR, Varma R, et al. Determinants of normal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Stratus OCT. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1046-1052.
33. Garcia-Valenzuela E, Mori M, Edward DP, Shahidi M. Thickness of the peripapillary retina in healthy subjects with different degrees of ametropia. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1321-1327.
34. Ozdek SC, Onol M, Gurelik G, Hasanreisoglu B. Scanning laser polarimetry in normal subjects and patients with myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:264-267.
35. Kremmer S, Zadow T, Steuhl KP, Selbach JM. Scanning laser polarimetry in myopic and hyperopic subjects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:489-494.
36. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Drance SM. The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:545-548.
37. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563.
38. Wolfs RC, Borger PH, Ramrattan RS, et al. Changing views on open-angle glaucoma: definitions and prevalences: The Rotterdam Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3309-3321.
39. Yablonski ME, Zimmerman TJ, Kass MA, Becker B. Prognostic significance of optic disk cupping in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980;89:585-592.
40. Harasymowycz P, Davis B, Xu G, Myers J, Bayer A, Spaeth GL. The use of RADAAR (ratio of rim area to disc area asymmetry) in detecting glaucoma and its severity. Can J Ophthalmol. 2004;39: 240-244.
41. Hawker MJ, Vernon SA, Ainsworth G, Hillman JG, MacNab HK, Dua HS. Asymmetry in optic disc morphometry as measured by Heidelberg Retina Tomography in a normal elderly population: the Bridlington Eye Assessment Project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4153-4158.
42. Rudnicka AR, Burk RO, Edgar DF, Fitzke FW. Magnification characteristics of fundus imaging systems. Ophthalmology. 1998;105: 2186-2192.