Asymmetry in optic disc morphometry as measured by Heidelberg Retina Tomography in a normal elderly population: The Bridlington Eye Assessment Project

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 46, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 4153-4158

  Hawker, Matthew J ^a   Vernon, Stephen A ^a   Ainsworth, Gerard ^a   Hillman, Jonathan G ^b   MacNab, Harmish K ^b   Dua, Harminder S ^a  

^a QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^b Medical Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MORPHOMETRICS; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTIC DISK; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; UNITED KINGDOM; VISUAL ACUITY; HISTOLOGY; LASER; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LASERS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; OPTIC DISK; REFERENCE VALUES; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33644685247     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-0423     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Rohrschneider K, Burk RO, Kruse FE, Volcker HE. Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1044-1049.
2. Miglior S, Guareschi M, Albe E, et al. Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regression analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:26-33.
3. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563.
4. Mikelberg F, Parfitt C, Swindale N, others. Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma 1995;4:242-247.
5. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Drance SM. The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:545-548.
6. Bathija R, Zangwill L, Berry CC, et al. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:121-127.
7. Ford BA, Artes PH, McCormick TA, et al. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1145-1150.
8. Hermann MM, Theofylaktopoulos I, Bangard N, et al. Optic nerve head morphometry in healthy adults using confocal laser scanning tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:761-765.
9. Durukan AH, Yucel I, Akar Y, Bayraktar MZ, Assessment of optic nerve head topographic parameters with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2004;32:259-264.
10. Nakamura H, Maeda T, Suzuki Y, Inoue Y. Scanning laser tomography to evaluate optic discs of normal eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1999;43:410-414.
11. Vernon S, Hawker M, Ainsworth G, et al. Laser scanning tomography of the optic nerve head in a normal elderly population: The Bridlington Eye Assessment Project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2823-2828.
12. Miglior S, Albe E, Guareschi M, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of optic disc stereometric parameters by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1072-1077.
13. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Wollstein G, et al. Inter- and intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg retina tomograph and computer assisted planimetry. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:664-669.
14. Wolfs RC, Borger PH, Ramrattan RS, et al. Changing views on open-angle glaucoma: definitions and prevalences. The Rotterdam Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3309-3321.
15. Yablonski ME, Zimmerman TJ, Kass MA, Becker B. Prognostic significance of optic disk cupping in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980;89:585-592.
16. Harasymowycz P, Davis B, Xu G, et al. The use of RADAAR (ratio of rim area to disc area asymmetry) in detecting glaucoma and its severity. Can J Ophthalmol. 2004;39:240-244.
17. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA, et al. Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy classifiers and stereophotograph evaluation for prediction of visual field abnormalities in glaucoma-suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2255-2262.
18. Agarwal HC, Gulati V, Sihota R. The normal optic nerve head on Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2003;51:25-33.
19. Saruhan A, Orgul S, Kocak I, et al. Descriptive information of topographic parameters computed at the optic nerve head with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:420-429.
20. Ong LS, Mitchell P, Healey PR, Cumming RG. Asymmetry in optic disc parameters: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:849-857.
21. Budde WM, Jonas JB, Martus P, Grundler AE. Influence of optic disc size on neuroretinal rim shape in healthy eyes. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:357-362.
22. Sihota R, Gulati V, Agarwal HC, et al. Variables affecting test-retest variability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II stereometric parameters. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:321-328.
23. Zangwill L, Irak I, Berry CC, et al. Effect of cataract and pupil size on image quality with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:983-990.