Evaluation of long-term implant success

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 76, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1623-1628

  Schwartz Arad, Devorah ^a   Herzberg, Ran ^a   Levin, Liran ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Bone loss; Criteria; Implant; Neck; Survival

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE;

CONSENSUS; DENTURE; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MEDLINE; OSTEOLYSIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; SOFT TISSUE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);

EID: 27844460996     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1623     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
2. Cehreli M, Sahin S, Akca K. Role of mechanical environment and implant design on bone tissue differentiation: Current knowledge and future context. J Dent 2004;32:123-132.
3. Wiskott HWA, Belser UC. Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: A working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:429-444.
4. 2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: An experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1223-1231.
5. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Biomaterial and implant surface: A surface science approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:247-259.
6. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
7. Hämmerle CH, Brägger U, Burgin W, Lang NP. The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI implants on marginal soft and hard tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:111-119.
8. Joly JC, de Lima AF, da Silva RC. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of soft and hard tissue changes around implants: A pilot study. J Periodontol 2003;74: 1097-1103.
9. Norton MR. Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:91-99.
10. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2000;71:1412-1424.
11. Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:1117-1130.
12. Piattelli A, Vrespa G, Petrone G, Iezzi G, Annibali S, Scarano A. Role of the microgap between implant and abutment: A retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys. J Periodontol 2003;74:346-352.
13. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res 2003;82:232-237.
14. Astrand P, Engquist B, Anzen B, et al. Nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:115-127.
15. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10: 387-416.
16. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, et al. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;15:39-52.
17. Jemt T, Lekholm U, Grondahl K. 3-year follow up study of early single implant restorations ad modum Brånemark. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1990; 10:340-349.
18. Brägger U, Hafeli U, Huber B, Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Evaluation of postsurgical crestal bone levels adjacent to non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:218-224.
19. Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: Myth or science? J Periodontol 2002;73:322-333.
20. Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:329-336 (erratum: Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:342).
21. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The edentulous predicament. I: A prospective study of the effectiveness of implant-supported fixed prostheses. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127:59-65.
22. Makkonen TA, Holmberg S, Niemi L, Olsson C, Tammisalo T, Peltola J. A 5-year prospective clinical study of Astra Tech dental implants supporting fixed bridges or overdentures in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:469-475.
23. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172.
24. Arvidsson K, Bystedt H, Frykholm A, von Konow L, Lothigius E. Five year prospective follow up report of Astra Tech dental implant system in treatment of edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9:225-234.
25. Eliasson A, Palmqvist S, Svenson B, Sondell K. Five-year results with fixed complete-arch mandibular prostheses supported by 4 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:505-510.
26. Friberg B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI. Long-term follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Brånemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2:184-189.
27. Ericsson I, Randow K, Nilner K, Peterson A. Early functional loading of Brånemark dental implants: 5-year clinical follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:70-77.
28. Hellem S, Karlsson U, Almfeldt I, Brunell G, Hamp SE, Astrand P. Nonsubmerged implants in the treatment of the edentulous lower jaw: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study of ITI hollow screws. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:20-29.
29. Moberg LE, Kondell PA, Sagulin GB, Bolin A, Heimdahl A, Gynther GW. Brånemark System and ITI Dental Implant System for treatment of mandibular edentulism. A comparative randomized study: 3-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:450-461.
30. Ferrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S, Grippaudo G. A long-term follow-up study of non-submerged ITI implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Part I: Ten-year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 1286 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:260-273.
31. Ekelund JA, Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Implant treatment in the edentulous mandible: A prospective study on Brånemark system implants over more than 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:602-608.
32. Andersson B, Glauser R, Maglione M, Taylor A. Ceramic implant abutments for short-span FPDs: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:640-646.
33. Hellden L, Ericson G, Elliot A, et al. A prospective 5-year multicenter study of the Cresco implantology concept. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:554-562.
34. Jeffcoat MK, McGlumphy EA, Reddy MS, Geurs NC, Proskin HM. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:406-410.
35. Zechner W, Trinkl N, Watzak G, et al. Radiologic follow-up of peri-implant bone loss around machine-surfaced and rough-surfaced interforaminal implants in the mandible functionally loaded for 3 to 7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:216-221.
36. McGlumphy EA, Peterson LJ, Larsen PE, Jeffcoat MK. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:82-92.
37. Haas R, Polak C, Furhauser R, Mailath-Pokorny G, Dortbudak O, Watzek G. A long-term follow-up of 76 Brånemark single-tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:38-43.
38. Merickse-Stern R, Aerni D, Geering AH, Buser D. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged hollow cylinder implants. Clinical and radiographic results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:252-259.
39. Carlsson GE, Lindquist LW, Jemt T. Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:295-302.
40. Albrektsson T. Hydroxyapatite-coated implants: A case against their use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56: 1312-1326.
41. Schwartz-Arad D, Mardinger O, Levin L, Koslovsky A, Hirshberg A. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:238-244.
42. Haas R, Donath K, Fodinger M, Watzek G. Bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus grafting: Comparative histomorphometric findings in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:107-116.
43. Schwartz-Arad D, Kidron N, Dolev E. A long-term study of implants supporting over dentures as a model for implant success. J Periodontol 2005;76:1431-1435.