Two-Year clinical evaluation of resinous restorative systems in non-carious cervical lesions

Brazilian Dental Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 229-234

  Santiago, Sérgio Lima ^a   Passos, Vanara Florêncio ^a   Vieira, Alessandra Helen Magacho ^a   Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima ^b   Lauris, José Roberto Pereira ^b   Franco, Eduardo Batista ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF CEARÁ   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cervical lesion; Clinical trial; Resin composite; Resin modified glass ionomer

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649349355     PISSN: 01036440     EISSN: 18064760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000300010     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Santiago SL, Franco EB, Mendonça JS, Lauris JRP, Navarro MFL. One-year clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in noncarious cervical lesions. J Appl Oral Sci 2003;11:175-180.
2. Franco EB, Benetti AR, Ishikiriama SK, Santiago SL, Lauris JRP, Jorge MFF, et al. Five-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2006;31:403-408.
3. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Three-year clinical evaluation of one-step in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 2002;15:309-311.
4. Belluz M, Pedrocca M, Gagliani M. Restorative treatment of cervical lesions with resin composites: 4-year results. Am J Dent 2005;18:307-310.
5. Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO. Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious class V lesions. Oper Dent 2000;25:46-50.
6. Burguess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ. Clinical evaluation of four class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall. Am J Dent 2004;17:147-150.
7. Van Dijken JWV. Retention of a resin modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up. J Dent 2005;33:541-547.
8. Neo J, Chew CL, Yap A, Sidhu S. Clinical evaluation of tooth colored materials in cervical lesions. Am J Dent 1996;9:15-18.
9. American Dental Association. Council on scientific affairs. Acceptance program guidelines. Rest Mater 1996;1-9.
10. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-358.
11. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL Van, Kanumilli P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, et al. Restoring cervical lesions with flexible composites. Dent Mater 2007;23:749-754.
12. Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Palma-Dibb RG. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacidmodified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:251-257.
13. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Two-year clinical evaluation of one-step self-etch systems in non-carious cervical lesion. J Dent 2009;37:149-155.
14. Ozel E, Say EC, Yurdaguven H, Soyman M. One-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without additional enamel etching technique in cervical lesions. Aust Dent J 2010;55:156-161.
15. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2006;34:97-105.
16. Santiago SL, Vieira AHM, Passos VF. Restorations of non-carious cervical lesions: problems and solutions. Pro-Odonto Estética 2008;1:83-138. (in Portuguese)
17. Peumans M, Kanamulli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864-881.
18. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Long-term dentin retention of etchand- rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cementin non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2008;24:915-922.
19. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Sluder TB. Contributing co-variables in clinical trials. Am J Dent 1991;4:247-250.
20. Ichim IP, Schmidlin PR, Li Q, Kieser JA, Swain MV. Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions Part II. Restorative material selection to minimize fracture. Dent Mater 2007;23:1562-1569.